Integrodifference equation: Difference between revisions
en>Jesse V. m various fixes, removed stub tag using AWB |
en>Addbot m Bot: Migrating 1 interwiki links, now provided by Wikidata on d:q6043371 |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The | In [[mathematics]], '''Gårding's inequality''' is a result that gives a lower bound for the [[bilinear form]] induced by a real [[Elliptic operator|linear elliptic partial differential operator]]. The inequality is named after [[Lars Gårding]]. | ||
==Statement of the inequality== | |||
Let Ω be a [[bounded set|bounded]], [[open set|open domain]] in ''n''-[[dimension]]al [[Euclidean space]] and let ''H''<sup>''k''</sup>(Ω) denote the [[Sobolev space]] of ''k''-times weakly differentiable functions ''u'' : Ω → '''R''' with weak derivatives in ''L''<sup>2</sup>. Assume that Ω satisfies the ''k''-extension property, i.e., that there exists a [[bounded linear operator]] ''E'' : ''H''<sup>''k''</sup>(Ω) → ''H''<sup>''k''</sup>('''R'''<sup>''n''</sup>) such that (''Eu'')|<sub>Ω</sub> = ''u'' for all ''u'' in ''H''<sup>''k''</sup>(Ω). | |||
Let ''L'' be a linear partial differential operator of even order ''2k'', written in divergence form | |||
:<math>(L u)(x) = \sum_{0 \leq | \alpha |, | \beta | \leq k} (-1)^{| \alpha |} \mathrm{D}^{\alpha} \left( A_{\alpha \beta} (x) \mathrm{D}^{\beta} u(x) \right),</math> | |||
and suppose that ''L'' is uniformly elliptic, i.e., there exists a constant ''θ'' > 0 such that | |||
:<math>\sum_{| \alpha |, | \beta | = k} \xi^{\alpha} A_{\alpha \beta} (x) \xi^{\beta} > \theta | \xi |^{2 k} \mbox{ for all } x \in \Omega, \xi \in \mathbb{R}^{n} \setminus \{ 0 \}.</math> | |||
Finally, suppose that the coefficients ''A<sub>αβ</sub>'' are [[bounded function|bounded]], [[continuous function]]s on the [[closure (topology)|closure]] of Ω for |''α''| = |''β''| = ''k'' and that | |||
:<math>A_{\alpha \beta} \in L^{\infty} (\Omega) \mbox{ for all } | \alpha |, | \beta | \leq k.</math> | |||
Then '''Gårding's inequality''' holds: there exist constants ''C'' > 0 and ''G'' ≥ 0 | |||
:<math>B[u, u] + G \| u \|_{L^{2} (\Omega)}^{2} \geq C \| u \|_{H^{k} (\Omega)}^{2} \mbox{ for all } u \in H_{0}^{k} (\Omega),</math> | |||
where | |||
:<math>B[v, u] = \sum_{0 \leq | \alpha |, | \beta | \leq k} \int_{\Omega} A_{\alpha \beta} (x) \mathrm{D}^{\alpha} u(x) \mathrm{D}^{\beta} v(x) \, \mathrm{d} x</math> | |||
is the bilinear form associated to the operator ''L''. | |||
==Application: the Laplace operator and the Poisson problem== | |||
As a simple example, consider the [[Laplace operator]] Δ. More specifically, suppose that one wishes to solve, for ''f'' ∈ ''L''<sup>2</sup>(Ω) the [[Poisson equation]] | |||
:<math>\begin{cases} - \Delta u(x) = f(x), & x \in \Omega; \\ u(x) = 0, & x \in \partial \Omega; \end{cases}</math> | |||
where Ω is a bounded [[Lipschitz domain]] in '''R'''<sup>''n''</sup>. The corresponding weak form of the problem is to find ''u'' in the Sobolev space ''H''<sub>0</sub><sup>1</sup>(Ω) such that | |||
:<math>B[u, v] = \langle f, v \rangle \mbox{ for all } v \in H_{0}^{1} (\Omega),</math> | |||
where | |||
:<math>B[u, v] = \int_{\Omega} \nabla u(x) \cdot \nabla v(x) \, \mathrm{d} x,</math> | |||
:<math>\langle f, v \rangle = \int_{\Omega} f(x) v(x) \, \mathrm{d} x.</math> | |||
The [[Lax–Milgram lemma]] ensures that if the bilinear form ''B'' is both continuous and elliptic with respect to the norm on ''H''<sub>0</sub><sup>1</sup>(Ω), then, for each ''f'' ∈ ''L''<sup>2</sup>(Ω), a unique solution ''u'' must exist in ''H''<sub>0</sub><sup>1</sup>(Ω). The hypotheses of Gårding's inequality are easy to verify for the Laplace operator Δ, so there exist constants ''C'' and ''G'' ≥ 0 | |||
:<math>B[u, u] \geq C \| u \|_{H^{1} (\Omega)}^{2} - G \| u \|_{L^{2} (\Omega)}^{2} \mbox{ for all } u \in H_{0}^{1} (\Omega).</math> | |||
Applying the [[Poincaré inequality]] allows the two terms on the right-hand side to be combined, yielding a new constant ''K'' > 0 with | |||
:<math>B[u, u] \geq K \| u \|_{H^{1} (\Omega)}^{2} \mbox{ for all } u \in H_{0}^{1} (\Omega),</math> | |||
which is precisely the statement that ''B'' is elliptic. The continuity of ''B'' is even easier to see: simply apply the [[Cauchy-Schwarz inequality]] and the fact that the Sobolev norm is controlled by the ''L''<sup>2</sup> norm of the gradient. | |||
==References== | |||
* {{cite book | |||
| author = Renardy, Michael and Rogers, Robert C. | |||
| title = An introduction to partial differential equations | |||
| series = Texts in Applied Mathematics 13 | |||
| edition = Second edition | |||
|publisher = Springer-Verlag | |||
| location = New York | |||
| year = 2004 | |||
| isbn = 0-387-00444-0 | |||
| page = 356 | |||
}} (Theorem 8.17) | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Garding's inequality}} | |||
[[Category:Functional analysis]] | |||
[[Category:Inequalities]] | |||
[[Category:Partial differential equations]] | |||
[[Category:Sobolev spaces]] |
Latest revision as of 10:18, 16 March 2013
In mathematics, Gårding's inequality is a result that gives a lower bound for the bilinear form induced by a real linear elliptic partial differential operator. The inequality is named after Lars Gårding.
Statement of the inequality
Let Ω be a bounded, open domain in n-dimensional Euclidean space and let Hk(Ω) denote the Sobolev space of k-times weakly differentiable functions u : Ω → R with weak derivatives in L2. Assume that Ω satisfies the k-extension property, i.e., that there exists a bounded linear operator E : Hk(Ω) → Hk(Rn) such that (Eu)|Ω = u for all u in Hk(Ω).
Let L be a linear partial differential operator of even order 2k, written in divergence form
and suppose that L is uniformly elliptic, i.e., there exists a constant θ > 0 such that
Finally, suppose that the coefficients Aαβ are bounded, continuous functions on the closure of Ω for |α| = |β| = k and that
Then Gårding's inequality holds: there exist constants C > 0 and G ≥ 0
where
is the bilinear form associated to the operator L.
Application: the Laplace operator and the Poisson problem
As a simple example, consider the Laplace operator Δ. More specifically, suppose that one wishes to solve, for f ∈ L2(Ω) the Poisson equation
where Ω is a bounded Lipschitz domain in Rn. The corresponding weak form of the problem is to find u in the Sobolev space H01(Ω) such that
where
The Lax–Milgram lemma ensures that if the bilinear form B is both continuous and elliptic with respect to the norm on H01(Ω), then, for each f ∈ L2(Ω), a unique solution u must exist in H01(Ω). The hypotheses of Gårding's inequality are easy to verify for the Laplace operator Δ, so there exist constants C and G ≥ 0
Applying the Poincaré inequality allows the two terms on the right-hand side to be combined, yielding a new constant K > 0 with
which is precisely the statement that B is elliptic. The continuity of B is even easier to see: simply apply the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the fact that the Sobolev norm is controlled by the L2 norm of the gradient.
References
- 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.
My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534 (Theorem 8.17)