Integrodifference equation: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Jesse V.
m various fixes, removed stub tag using AWB
 
en>Addbot
m Bot: Migrating 1 interwiki links, now provided by Wikidata on d:q6043371
 
Line 1: Line 1:
The writer is recognized by the name of Numbers Lint. South Dakota is where me and my spouse reside and my family enjoys it. My day job is a meter reader. One of the very best issues in the globe for me is to do aerobics and I've been performing it for quite a while.<br><br>Feel free to surf to my website :: home std test kit ([http://blogzaa.com/blogs/post/9199 click through the following internet site])
In [[mathematics]], '''Gårding's inequality''' is a result that gives a lower bound for the [[bilinear form]] induced by a real [[Elliptic operator|linear elliptic partial differential operator]]. The inequality is named after [[Lars Gårding]].
 
==Statement of the inequality==
 
Let Ω be a [[bounded set|bounded]], [[open set|open domain]] in ''n''-[[dimension]]al [[Euclidean space]] and let ''H''<sup>''k''</sup>(Ω) denote the [[Sobolev space]] of ''k''-times weakly differentiable functions ''u''&nbsp;:&nbsp;Ω&nbsp;→&nbsp;'''R''' with weak derivatives in ''L''<sup>2</sup>. Assume that Ω satisfies the ''k''-extension property, i.e., that there exists a [[bounded linear operator]] ''E''&nbsp;:&nbsp;''H''<sup>''k''</sup>(Ω)&nbsp;→&nbsp;''H''<sup>''k''</sup>('''R'''<sup>''n''</sup>) such that (''Eu'')|<sub>Ω</sub>&nbsp;=&nbsp;''u'' for all ''u'' in ''H''<sup>''k''</sup>(Ω).
 
Let ''L'' be a linear partial differential operator of even order ''2k'', written in divergence form
 
:<math>(L u)(x) = \sum_{0 \leq | \alpha |, | \beta | \leq k} (-1)^{| \alpha |} \mathrm{D}^{\alpha} \left( A_{\alpha \beta} (x) \mathrm{D}^{\beta} u(x) \right),</math>
 
and suppose that ''L'' is uniformly elliptic, i.e., there exists a constant ''&theta;'' > 0 such that
 
:<math>\sum_{| \alpha |, | \beta | = k} \xi^{\alpha} A_{\alpha \beta} (x) \xi^{\beta} > \theta | \xi |^{2 k} \mbox{ for all } x \in \Omega, \xi \in \mathbb{R}^{n} \setminus \{ 0 \}.</math>
 
Finally, suppose that the coefficients ''A<sub>&alpha;&beta;</sub>'' are [[bounded function|bounded]], [[continuous function]]s on the [[closure (topology)|closure]] of Ω for |''&alpha;''| = |''&beta;''| = ''k'' and that
 
:<math>A_{\alpha \beta} \in L^{\infty} (\Omega) \mbox{ for all } | \alpha |, | \beta | \leq k.</math>
 
Then '''Gårding's inequality''' holds: there exist constants ''C''&nbsp;>&nbsp;0 and ''G''&nbsp;≥&nbsp;0
 
:<math>B[u, u] + G \| u \|_{L^{2} (\Omega)}^{2} \geq C \| u \|_{H^{k} (\Omega)}^{2} \mbox{ for all } u \in H_{0}^{k} (\Omega),</math>
 
where
 
:<math>B[v, u] = \sum_{0 \leq | \alpha |, | \beta | \leq k} \int_{\Omega} A_{\alpha \beta} (x) \mathrm{D}^{\alpha} u(x) \mathrm{D}^{\beta} v(x) \, \mathrm{d} x</math>
 
is the bilinear form associated to the operator ''L''.
 
==Application: the Laplace operator and the Poisson problem==
 
As a simple example, consider the [[Laplace operator]] Δ. More specifically, suppose that one wishes to solve, for ''f''&nbsp;∈&nbsp;''L''<sup>2</sup>(Ω) the [[Poisson equation]]
 
:<math>\begin{cases} - \Delta u(x) = f(x), & x \in \Omega; \\ u(x) = 0, & x \in \partial \Omega; \end{cases}</math>
 
where Ω is a bounded [[Lipschitz domain]] in '''R'''<sup>''n''</sup>. The corresponding weak form of the problem is to find ''u'' in the Sobolev space ''H''<sub>0</sub><sup>1</sup>(Ω) such that
 
:<math>B[u, v] = \langle f, v \rangle \mbox{ for all } v \in H_{0}^{1} (\Omega),</math>
 
where
 
:<math>B[u, v] = \int_{\Omega} \nabla u(x) \cdot \nabla v(x) \, \mathrm{d} x,</math>
:<math>\langle f, v \rangle = \int_{\Omega} f(x) v(x) \, \mathrm{d} x.</math>
 
The [[Lax–Milgram lemma]] ensures that if the bilinear form ''B'' is both continuous and elliptic with respect to the norm on ''H''<sub>0</sub><sup>1</sup>(Ω), then, for each ''f''&nbsp;∈&nbsp;''L''<sup>2</sup>(Ω), a unique solution ''u'' must exist in ''H''<sub>0</sub><sup>1</sup>(Ω).  The hypotheses of Gårding's inequality are easy to verify for the Laplace operator Δ, so there exist constants ''C'' and ''G''&nbsp;≥&nbsp;0
 
:<math>B[u, u] \geq C \| u \|_{H^{1} (\Omega)}^{2} - G \| u \|_{L^{2} (\Omega)}^{2}  \mbox{ for all } u \in H_{0}^{1} (\Omega).</math>
 
Applying the [[Poincaré inequality]] allows the two terms on the right-hand side to be combined, yielding a new constant ''K''&nbsp;&gt;&nbsp;0 with
 
:<math>B[u, u] \geq K \| u \|_{H^{1} (\Omega)}^{2} \mbox{ for all } u \in H_{0}^{1} (\Omega),</math>
 
which is precisely the statement that ''B'' is elliptic. The continuity of ''B'' is even easier to see:  simply apply the [[Cauchy-Schwarz inequality]] and the fact that the Sobolev norm is controlled by the ''L''<sup>2</sup> norm of the gradient.
 
==References==
 
* {{cite book
|  author = Renardy, Michael and Rogers, Robert C.
|    title = An introduction to partial differential equations
|  series = Texts in Applied Mathematics 13
|  edition = Second edition
|publisher = Springer-Verlag
| location = New York
|    year = 2004
|    isbn = 0-387-00444-0
|    page = 356
}} (Theorem 8.17)
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Garding's inequality}}
[[Category:Functional analysis]]
[[Category:Inequalities]]
[[Category:Partial differential equations]]
[[Category:Sobolev spaces]]

Latest revision as of 10:18, 16 March 2013

In mathematics, Gårding's inequality is a result that gives a lower bound for the bilinear form induced by a real linear elliptic partial differential operator. The inequality is named after Lars Gårding.

Statement of the inequality

Let Ω be a bounded, open domain in n-dimensional Euclidean space and let Hk(Ω) denote the Sobolev space of k-times weakly differentiable functions u : Ω → R with weak derivatives in L2. Assume that Ω satisfies the k-extension property, i.e., that there exists a bounded linear operator E : Hk(Ω) → Hk(Rn) such that (Eu)|Ω = u for all u in Hk(Ω).

Let L be a linear partial differential operator of even order 2k, written in divergence form

(Lu)(x)=0|α|,|β|k(1)|α|Dα(Aαβ(x)Dβu(x)),

and suppose that L is uniformly elliptic, i.e., there exists a constant θ > 0 such that

|α|,|β|=kξαAαβ(x)ξβ>θ|ξ|2k for all xΩ,ξn{0}.

Finally, suppose that the coefficients Aαβ are bounded, continuous functions on the closure of Ω for |α| = |β| = k and that

AαβL(Ω) for all |α|,|β|k.

Then Gårding's inequality holds: there exist constants C > 0 and G ≥ 0

B[u,u]+GuL2(Ω)2CuHk(Ω)2 for all uH0k(Ω),

where

B[v,u]=0|α|,|β|kΩAαβ(x)Dαu(x)Dβv(x)dx

is the bilinear form associated to the operator L.

Application: the Laplace operator and the Poisson problem

As a simple example, consider the Laplace operator Δ. More specifically, suppose that one wishes to solve, for f ∈ L2(Ω) the Poisson equation

{Δu(x)=f(x),xΩ;u(x)=0,xΩ;

where Ω is a bounded Lipschitz domain in Rn. The corresponding weak form of the problem is to find u in the Sobolev space H01(Ω) such that

B[u,v]=f,v for all vH01(Ω),

where

B[u,v]=Ωu(x)v(x)dx,
f,v=Ωf(x)v(x)dx.

The Lax–Milgram lemma ensures that if the bilinear form B is both continuous and elliptic with respect to the norm on H01(Ω), then, for each f ∈ L2(Ω), a unique solution u must exist in H01(Ω). The hypotheses of Gårding's inequality are easy to verify for the Laplace operator Δ, so there exist constants C and G ≥ 0

B[u,u]CuH1(Ω)2GuL2(Ω)2 for all uH01(Ω).

Applying the Poincaré inequality allows the two terms on the right-hand side to be combined, yielding a new constant K > 0 with

B[u,u]KuH1(Ω)2 for all uH01(Ω),

which is precisely the statement that B is elliptic. The continuity of B is even easier to see: simply apply the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the fact that the Sobolev norm is controlled by the L2 norm of the gradient.

References

  • 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534 (Theorem 8.17)