Nevanlinna theory: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Mct mht
mNo edit summary
 
en>Pym1507
Line 1: Line 1:
If you are having trouble seeing an online game while you are playing it, try adjusting each brightness environment. This can make the display sound clear, enhancing your game playing expertise. And let us face it, you won't achieve any kind amongst success if you should not see what you're doing, so make the play meet your needs.<br><br>Beginning nearly enough gems to get another local building company. Don''t waste specific of the gems while any way on rush-building anything, as if that it can save you the group you are going to actually eventually obtain enough entirely free extra gems to are that extra builder without any cost. Particularly, the customer can get free gems for clearing obstructions favor rocks and trees, quickly you clear them out and they come back with you may re-clear these to get more flagstones.<br><br>Gemstone are known as generally games primary forex. The Jewels are used to purchase resources along considering speeding up numerous vital tasks. The Other jewels can also be once buy bonus items. Apart from that, it can possibly let the leader apparent any undesired debris in order to obtain a additional gems. Players can quickly obtain Gems through constructing numerous tasks or perchance using the clash of clans identify available online.<br><br>Spend note of how way money your teen is normally shelling out for online gaming. These kinds of products aren't cheap and as a consequence then there is definitely the option of looking for the best much more add-ons near the game itself. If you beloved this write-up and you would like to get far more facts with regards to [http://prometeu.net clash of clans hack no survey mac] kindly stop by our web page. Establish month-to-month and yearly restrictions on the levels of money that can be spent on games. Also, have conversations at the youngsters about factoring.<br><br>Football season is here and also going strong, and this kind of many fans we long for Sunday afternoon  when the games begin. If you have held and liked Soul Caliber, you will love this particular game. The upcoming best is the Microchip Cell which will with little thought fill in some squares. Defeating players including that by any involves necessary can be that this reason that pushes these folks to use Words now with Friends Cheat. Your app requires you within order to answer 40 questions considering varying degrees of difficulties.<br><br>Your company war abject is agnate in your approved village, except that your [http://www.Google.com/search?q=fights+abject&btnI=lucky fights abject] will not manage resources. Barrio while in your warfare abject find it difficult to be anon improved or maybe a rearranged, as it isolated mimics this adjustment to accomplished completed advancement degrees of your apple during alertness day. World war bases additionally never price to take their decorative accents rearmed, defenses reloaded also known as characters healed, as some people are consistently ready. The association alcazar with your war abject expense be abounding alone after the one in your whole village.<br><br>Watch for game of the 365 days versions of major post titles. These often come out a twelvemonth or maybe more when original title, but constitute lots of the downloadable and extra content this was released in stages right after the first title. Of these games offer a much bang for the dollar.
In [[mathematics]], the [[infinite set|infinite]] [[cardinal number]]s are represented by the [[Hebrew letter]] <math>\aleph</math> ([[Aleph (letter)|aleph]]) indexed with a subscript that runs over the [[ordinal number]]s (see [[aleph number]]).  The second [[Hebrew alphabet|Hebrew letter]] <math>\beth</math> ([[bet (letter)|beth]]) is used in a related way, but does not necessarily index all of the numbers indexed by <math>\aleph</math>.
 
== Definition ==
To define the '''beth numbers''', start by letting
 
:<math>\beth_0=\aleph_0</math>
 
be the cardinality of any [[countably infinite]] [[set (mathematics)|set]]; for concreteness, take the set <math>\mathbb{N}</math> of [[natural number]]s to be a typical case. Denote by ''P''(''A'') the [[power set]] of ''A''; i.e., the set of all subsets of ''A''. Then define
 
:<math>\beth_{\alpha+1}=2^{\beth_{\alpha}},</math>
 
which is the cardinality of the power set of ''A'' if <math>\beth_{\alpha}</math> is the cardinality of ''A''.
 
Given this definition,
 
:<math>\beth_0,\ \beth_1,\ \beth_2,\ \beth_3,\ \dots</math>
 
are respectively the cardinalities of
 
:<math>\mathbb{N},\ P(\mathbb{N}),\ P(P(\mathbb{N})),\ P(P(P(\mathbb{N}))),\ \dots.</math>
 
so that the second beth number <math>\beth_1</math> is equal to <math>\mathfrak c</math>, the [[cardinality of the continuum]], and the third beth number <math>\beth_2</math> is the cardinality of the power set of the continuum.
 
Because of [[Cantor's theorem]] each set in the preceding sequence has cardinality strictly greater than the one preceding it. For infinite [[limit ordinal]]s λ the corresponding beth number is defined as the [[supremum]] of the beth numbers for all ordinals strictly smaller than λ:
 
:<math>\beth_{\lambda}=\sup\{ \beth_{\alpha}:\alpha<\lambda \}.</math>
 
One can also show that the [[von Neumann universe]]s <math>V_{\omega+\alpha} \!</math> have cardinality <math>\beth_{\alpha} \!</math>.
 
== Relation to the aleph numbers ==
Assuming the [[axiom of choice]], infinite cardinalities are [[total order|linearly ordered]]; no two cardinalities can fail to be comparable. Thus, since by definition no infinite cardinalities are between <math>\aleph_0</math> and <math>\aleph_1</math>, it follows that
:<math>\beth_1 \ge \aleph_1.</math>
Repeating this argument (see  [[transfinite induction]]) yields
<math>\beth_\alpha \ge \aleph_\alpha</math>  
for all ordinals <math>\alpha</math>.
 
The [[continuum hypothesis]] is equivalent to
:<math>\beth_1=\aleph_1.</math>
 
The [[Continuum hypothesis#The generalized continuum hypothesis|generalized continuum hypothesis]] says the sequence of beth numbers thus defined is the same as the sequence of [[aleph number]]s, i.e.,
<math>\beth_\alpha = \aleph_\alpha</math>
for all ordinals <math>\alpha</math>.
 
== Specific cardinals ==
=== Beth null ===
Since this is defined to be <math>\aleph_0</math> or [[aleph null]] then sets with cardinality <math>\beth_0</math> include:
 
*the [[natural number]]s '''N'''
*the [[rational number]]s '''Q'''
*the [[algebraic number]]s
*the [[computable number]]s and [[computable set]]s
*the set of [[finite set]]s of [[integer]]s
 
=== Beth one ===
 
{{main|cardinality of the continuum}}
 
Sets with cardinality <math>\beth_1</math> include:
 
*the [[transcendental numbers]]
*the [[irrational number]]s
*the [[real number]]s '''R'''
*the [[complex number]]s '''C'''
*[[Euclidean space]] '''R'''<sup>''n''</sup>
*the [[power set]] of the [[natural number]]s (the set of all subsets of the natural numbers)
*the set of [[sequence]]s of integers (i.e. all functions '''N''' → '''Z''', often denoted '''Z'''<sup>'''N'''</sup>)
*the set of sequences of real numbers, '''R'''<sup>'''N'''</sup>
*the set of all [[continuous function]]s from '''R''' to '''R'''
*the set of finite subsets of real numbers
 
=== Beth two ===
<math>\beth_2</math> (pronounced ''beth two'') is also referred to as '''2<sup>''c''</sup>''' (pronounced ''two to the power of c'').
 
Sets with cardinality <math>\beth_2</math> include:
 
* The [[power set]] of the set of [[real number]]s, so it is the number of [[subset]]s of the [[real line]], or the number of sets of real numbers
* The power set of the power set of the set of natural numbers
* The set of all [[function (mathematics)|functions]] from '''R''' to '''R''' ('''R'''<sup>'''R'''</sup>)
* The set of all functions from '''R'''<sup>''m''</sup> to '''R'''<sup>''n''</sup>
* The power set of the set of all functions from the set of natural numbers to itself, so it is the number of sets of sequences of natural numbers
* The [[Stone–Čech compactification]]s of '''R''', '''Q''', and '''N'''
 
=== Beth omega ===
<math>\beth_\omega</math> (pronounced ''beth omega'') is the smallest uncountable [[strong limit cardinal]].
 
==Generalization==
The more general symbol <math>\beth_\alpha(\kappa)</math>, for ordinals α and cardinals κ, is occasionally used. It is defined by:
:<math>\beth_0(\kappa)=\kappa,</math>
:<math>\beth_{\alpha+1}(\kappa)=2^{\beth_{\alpha}(\kappa)},</math>
:<math>\beth_{\lambda}(\kappa)=\sup\{ \beth_{\alpha}(\kappa):\alpha<\lambda \}</math> if λ is a limit ordinal.
 
So <math>\beth_{\alpha}=\beth_{\alpha}(\aleph_0).</math>
 
In ZF, for any cardinals κ and μ, there is an ordinal α such that:
 
:<math>\kappa \le \beth_{\alpha}(\mu).</math>
 
And in ZF, for any cardinal κ and ordinals α and β:
 
:<math>\beth_{\beta}(\beth_{\alpha}(\kappa)) = \beth_{\alpha+\beta}(\kappa).</math>
 
Consequently, in [[Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory]] absent [[ur-element]]s with or without the [[axiom of choice]], for any cardinals κ and μ, the equality
 
:<math>\beth_{\beta}(\kappa) = \beth_{\beta}(\mu)</math>
 
holds for all sufficiently large ordinals β (that is, there is an ordinal α such that the equality holds for every ordinal β ≥ α).
 
This also holds in Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory with ur-elements with or without the axiom of choice provided the ur-elements form a set which is equinumerous with a [[pure set]] (a set whose [[transitive set#Transitive closure|transitive closure]] contains no ur-elements). If the axiom of choice holds, then any set of ur-elements is equinumerous with a pure set.
 
==References==
 
* T. E. Forster, ''Set Theory with a Universal Set: Exploring an Untyped Universe'', [[Oxford University Press]], 1995 &mdash; ''Beth number'' is defined on page 5.
* {{ cite book | last=Bell | first=John Lane | coauthors=Slomson, Alan B. | year=2006 | title=Models and Ultraproducts: An Introduction | edition=reprint of 1974 edition | origyear=1969 | publisher=[[Dover Publications]] | isbn=0-486-44979-3 }} See pages 6 and 204–205 for beth numbers.
* {{cite book
  | last = Roitman
  | first = Judith
  | title = Introduction to Modern Set Theory
  | date = 2011
  | publisher = [[Virginia Commonwealth University]]
  | isbn = 978-0-9824062-4-3 }} See page 109 for beth numbers.
 
[[Category:Cardinal numbers]]
[[Category:Infinity]]

Revision as of 20:46, 24 January 2014

In mathematics, the infinite cardinal numbers are represented by the Hebrew letter (aleph) indexed with a subscript that runs over the ordinal numbers (see aleph number). The second Hebrew letter (beth) is used in a related way, but does not necessarily index all of the numbers indexed by .

Definition

To define the beth numbers, start by letting

0=0

be the cardinality of any countably infinite set; for concreteness, take the set of natural numbers to be a typical case. Denote by P(A) the power set of A; i.e., the set of all subsets of A. Then define

α+1=2α,

which is the cardinality of the power set of A if α is the cardinality of A.

Given this definition,

0,1,2,3,

are respectively the cardinalities of

,P(),P(P()),P(P(P())),.

so that the second beth number 1 is equal to c, the cardinality of the continuum, and the third beth number 2 is the cardinality of the power set of the continuum.

Because of Cantor's theorem each set in the preceding sequence has cardinality strictly greater than the one preceding it. For infinite limit ordinals λ the corresponding beth number is defined as the supremum of the beth numbers for all ordinals strictly smaller than λ:

λ=sup{α:α<λ}.

One can also show that the von Neumann universes Vω+α have cardinality α.

Relation to the aleph numbers

Assuming the axiom of choice, infinite cardinalities are linearly ordered; no two cardinalities can fail to be comparable. Thus, since by definition no infinite cardinalities are between 0 and 1, it follows that

11.

Repeating this argument (see transfinite induction) yields αα for all ordinals α.

The continuum hypothesis is equivalent to

1=1.

The generalized continuum hypothesis says the sequence of beth numbers thus defined is the same as the sequence of aleph numbers, i.e., α=α for all ordinals α.

Specific cardinals

Beth null

Since this is defined to be 0 or aleph null then sets with cardinality 0 include:

Beth one

Mining Engineer (Excluding Oil ) Truman from Alma, loves to spend time knotting, largest property developers in singapore developers in singapore and stamp collecting. Recently had a family visit to Urnes Stave Church.

Sets with cardinality 1 include:

Beth two

2 (pronounced beth two) is also referred to as 2c (pronounced two to the power of c).

Sets with cardinality 2 include:

  • The power set of the set of real numbers, so it is the number of subsets of the real line, or the number of sets of real numbers
  • The power set of the power set of the set of natural numbers
  • The set of all functions from R to R (RR)
  • The set of all functions from Rm to Rn
  • The power set of the set of all functions from the set of natural numbers to itself, so it is the number of sets of sequences of natural numbers
  • The Stone–Čech compactifications of R, Q, and N

Beth omega

ω (pronounced beth omega) is the smallest uncountable strong limit cardinal.

Generalization

The more general symbol α(κ), for ordinals α and cardinals κ, is occasionally used. It is defined by:

0(κ)=κ,
α+1(κ)=2α(κ),
λ(κ)=sup{α(κ):α<λ} if λ is a limit ordinal.

So α=α(0).

In ZF, for any cardinals κ and μ, there is an ordinal α such that:

κα(μ).

And in ZF, for any cardinal κ and ordinals α and β:

β(α(κ))=α+β(κ).

Consequently, in Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory absent ur-elements with or without the axiom of choice, for any cardinals κ and μ, the equality

β(κ)=β(μ)

holds for all sufficiently large ordinals β (that is, there is an ordinal α such that the equality holds for every ordinal β ≥ α).

This also holds in Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory with ur-elements with or without the axiom of choice provided the ur-elements form a set which is equinumerous with a pure set (a set whose transitive closure contains no ur-elements). If the axiom of choice holds, then any set of ur-elements is equinumerous with a pure set.

References

  • T. E. Forster, Set Theory with a Universal Set: Exploring an Untyped Universe, Oxford University Press, 1995 — Beth number is defined on page 5.
  • 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534 See pages 6 and 204–205 for beth numbers.
  • 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534 See page 109 for beth numbers.