Complex measure

In mathematics, more precisely in measure theory, an atom is a measurable set which has positive measure and contains no set of smaller but positive measure. A measure which has no atoms is called non-atomic or atomless.

Definition

Given a measurable space $(X,\Sigma )$ and a measure $\mu$ on that space, a set $A$ in $\Sigma$ is called an atom if

$\mu (A)>0\,$

and for any measurable subset $B$ of $A$ with

$\mu (A)>\mu (B)\,$

one has $\mu (B)=0.$

Examples

• Consider the set X={1, 2, ..., 9, 10} and let the sigma-algebra $\Sigma$ be the power set of X. Define the measure $\mu$ of a set to be its cardinality, that is, the number of elements in the set. Then, each of the singletons {i}, for i=1,2, ..., 9, 10 is an atom.
• Consider the Lebesgue measure on the real line. This measure has no atoms.

Non-atomic measures

A measure which has no atoms is called non-atomic. In other words, a measure is non-atomic if for any measurable set $A$ with $\mu (A)>0$ there exists a measurable subset B of A such that

$\mu (A)>\mu (B)>0.\,$

A non-atomic measure with at least one positive value has an infinite number of distinct values, as starting with a set A with $\mu (A)>0$ one can construct a decreasing sequence of measurable sets

$A=A_{1}\supset A_{2}\supset A_{3}\supset \cdots$

such that

$\mu (A)=\mu (A_{1})>\mu (A_{2})>\mu (A_{3})>\cdots >0.$

This may not be true for measures having atoms; see the first example above.

It turns out that non-atomic measures actually have a continuum of values. It can be proved that if μ is a non-atomic measure and A is a measurable set with $\mu (A)>0,$ then for any real number b satisfying

$\mu (A)\geq b\geq 0\,$

there exists a measurable subset B of A such that

$\mu (B)=b.\,$

This theorem is due to Wacław Sierpiński. It is reminiscent of the intermediate value theorem for continuous functions.

Sketch of proof of Sierpiński's theorem on non-atomic measures. A slightly stronger statement, which however makes the proof easier, is that if $(X,\Sigma ,\mu )$ is a non-atomic measure space and $\mu (X)=c$, there exists a function $S:[0,c]\to \Sigma$ that is monotone with respect to inclusion, and a right-inverse to $\mu :\Sigma \to [0,\,c]$. That is, there exists a one-parameter family of measurable sets S(t) such that for all $0\leq t\leq t'\leq c$

$S(t)\subset S(t'),$

$\mu \left(S(t)\right)=t.$

The proof easily follows from Zorn's lemma applied to the set of all monotone partial sections to $\mu$ :

$\Gamma :=\{S:D\to \Sigma \;:\;D\subset [0,\,c],\,S\;\mathrm {monotone} ,\forall t\in D\;(\mu \left(S(t)\right)=t)\},$

ordered by inclusion of graphs, $\mathrm {graph} (S)\subset \mathrm {graph} (S').$ It's then standard to show that every chain in $\Gamma$ has an upper bound in $\Gamma$, and that any maximal element of $\Gamma$ has domain $[0,c],$ proving the claim.

See also

• Atom (order theory) — an analogous concept in order theory
• Dirac delta function
• Elementary event, also known as an atomic event

References

• 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.
  
  My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
• 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.
  
  My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534