Modal companion: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>AK456
 
en>Mark viking
Line 1: Line 1:
I would like to introduce myself to you, I am Jayson Simcox but I don't like when people use my complete name. Since I was 18 I've been operating as a bookkeeper but soon my wife and I will begin our personal business. One of the things she loves most is canoeing and she's been doing it for quite a while. Ohio is exactly where his home is and his family enjoys it.<br><br>Feel free to surf to my web blog; [http://checkmates.co.za/index.php?do=/profile-56347/info/ accurate psychic readings] love [http://myfusionprofits.com/groups/find-out-about-self-improvement-tips-here/ psychic readings] ([http://mybrandcp.com/xe/board_XmDx25/107997 http://mybrandcp.com/])
In [[mathematics]], a nonempty collection of [[Set (mathematics)|sets]] <math>\mathcal{R}</math> is called a '''σ-ring''' (pronounced ''sigma-ring'') if it is [[closure (mathematics)|closed]] under countable [[union (set theory)|union]] and [[Complement (set theory)|relative complementation]]:
#<math>\bigcup_{n=1}^{\infty} A_{n} \in \mathcal{R}</math> if <math>A_{n} \in \mathcal{R}</math> for all <math>n \in \mathbb{N}</math>
#<math>A \smallsetminus B \in \mathcal{R}</math> if <math>A, B \in \mathcal{R}</math>
 
From these two properties we immediately see that
:<math>\bigcap_{n=1}^{\infty} A_n \in \mathcal{R}</math> if <math>A_{n} \in \mathcal{R}</math> for all <math>n \in \mathbb{N}</math>
 
This is simply because <math>\cap_{n=1}^\infty A_n = A_1 \smallsetminus \cup_{n=1}^{\infty}(A_1 \smallsetminus A_n)</math>.
 
If the first property is weakened to closure under finite union (i.e., <math>A \cup B \in \mathcal{R}</math> whenever <math>A, B \in \mathcal{R}</math>) but not countable union, then <math>\mathcal{R}</math> is a [[Ring of sets|ring]] but not a σ-ring.
 
σ-rings can be used instead of [[Sigma-algebra|σ-fields]] in the development of [[Measure (mathematics)|measure]] and [[Integral|integration]] theory, if one does not wish to require that the [[Universe (mathematics)|universal set]] be measurable. Every σ-field is also a σ-ring, but a σ-ring need not be a σ-field.
 
A σ-ring induces a [[Sigma-algebra|σ-field]]. If <math>\mathcal{R}</math> is a σ-ring over the set <math>X</math>, then define <math>\mathcal{A}</math> to be the collection of all subsets of X that are elements of <math>\mathcal{R}</math> or whose complements are elements of <math>\mathcal{R}</math>. We see that <math>\mathcal{A}</math> is a σ-field over the set
X.
 
== See also ==
*[[Delta ring]]
*[[Ring of sets]]
*[[Sigma-algebra|Sigma field]]
 
== References ==
* [[Walter Rudin]], 1976. ''Principles of Mathematical Analysis'', 3rd. ed. McGraw-Hill. Final chapter uses σ-rings in development of Lebesgue theory.
 
{{Mathanalysis-stub}}
 
[[Category:Measure theory]]
[[Category:Set families]]

Revision as of 23:54, 6 September 2013

In mathematics, a nonempty collection of sets is called a σ-ring (pronounced sigma-ring) if it is closed under countable union and relative complementation:

  1. n=1An if An for all n
  2. AB if A,B

From these two properties we immediately see that

n=1An if An for all n

This is simply because n=1An=A1n=1(A1An).

If the first property is weakened to closure under finite union (i.e., AB whenever A,B) but not countable union, then is a ring but not a σ-ring.

σ-rings can be used instead of σ-fields in the development of measure and integration theory, if one does not wish to require that the universal set be measurable. Every σ-field is also a σ-ring, but a σ-ring need not be a σ-field.

A σ-ring induces a σ-field. If is a σ-ring over the set X, then define 𝒜 to be the collection of all subsets of X that are elements of or whose complements are elements of . We see that 𝒜 is a σ-field over the set X.

See also

References

  • Walter Rudin, 1976. Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd. ed. McGraw-Hill. Final chapter uses σ-rings in development of Lebesgue theory.

Template:Mathanalysis-stub