Erdős distinct distances problem: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Mkwallace
Added link to Nets Katz page.
 
en>Rjwilmsi
m References: Journal cites, added 1 DOI using AWB (9887)
Line 1: Line 1:
It's vital to shop your knives appropriately for security reason and and to stop harm and premature dulling of your the blades. I got my initial fixed-blade knife in 1952. This colander is accessible in numerous sizes as nicely as actually cool colors to match your kitchen and makes a good gift also! Some of the Rösle utensils located in the U.S. are created in China. The high-quality is nonetheless good, but not as fantastic as the utensils that say " made in Germany " on them. Use the tip to get precision cuts, I have even employed it to carve flowers and such out of veggies when I did not have a paring knife.<br><br><br><br>Stage two performs best for routine sharpening and ought to be applied regularly and regularly for finest benefits with your knives. A finer-grit diamond sharpening abrasive in stage two pares down the shape into a fantastic, strong, and durable bevel that tends to make knives super sharp. The final stage, stage 3, makes use of a patented material that offers knives a remarkable sharp, skilled-grade polish and sharpening that is unparalleled.<br><br>Now it is up to you to choose what meets your demands and fits your budget to assistance equip your kitchen and make cooking a lot far more pleasurable practical experience. We will update the comparison chart as new knives and knife sets are introduced that will need to be added to the list. If you really feel like we have missed a superior set that needs to be integrated then get in touch with your best kitchen knives. Zwilling J A Henckels hashistory of creating knives that go back over 270 years.  Kitchen knife sets can be incredibly pricey.<br><br>As the world gets additional difficult people today are picking out to take life in a simpler way and several are turning to look for basic luxuries in life such as spending time with loved ones more than a cup of steaming coffee and freshly baked cakes.  If you liked this short article and you would like to get a lot more data concerning [http://www.thebestkitchenknivesreviews.com/best-cutting-boards-reviews-guide-and-comparison/ finest cutting boards critique] kindly take a look at our own page. Our list of most effective-reviewed chef's knives attributes our customer's prime picks of these quintessential culinary tools.  German knives commonly feature high-carbon stainless or no-stain steel blades, which are additional difficult and sharpen nicely. The ultra-modern Ikon knives do.<br><br>Final is the most pricey Chef's Decision 130 Qualified Knife-Sharpening Station, [http://www.dict.cc/?s=Platinum Platinum] this one particular is the finest if you are employing your knives excessively  Finest Kitchen Cutting Boards and also lesser high-quality knives that you may have that aren't Wusthof's. Furthermore, do not forget to take care of them by utilizing knives sleeves and sharpener.  In these way a appropriate taken cared knives will final you a life time. You don't require 10 knives anyways…a chef's knife will do it all.
In [[mathematics]], and more precisely in  [[mathematical analysis|analysis]],
the '''Wallis' integrals''' constitute a family of [[integral]]s introduced by [[John Wallis]].
 
== Definition, basic properties ==
 
The ''Wallis' integrals'' are the terms of the sequence
<math>(W_n)_{\,n\, \in\, \mathbb{N}\,}</math> defined by:
:<math> W_n = \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \sin^n(x)\,dx, </math>
or equivalently (through a substitution: <math>x = \frac{\pi}{2} - t</math>):
:<math> W_n = \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \cos^n(x)\,dx</math>
In particular, the first two terms of this sequence are:
:<math>\quad W_0=\frac{\pi}{2}\qquad \text{ and }\quad W_1=1\,</math>
 
The sequence <math>\ (W_n)</math> is decreasing and has strictly positive terms.
In fact, for all <math>n \in\, \mathbb{N}</math> :
*<math>\ W_n > 0</math>, because it is an integral of a non-negative continuous function which is not all zero in the integration interval
*<math>W_{n} - W_{n + 1}= \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \sin^{n}(x)\,dx - \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \sin^{n + 1}(x)\,dx = \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \sin^{n}(x)\, [1 - \sin(x)]\,dx \geqslant 0</math>
:(by the linearity of integration and because the last integral is an integral of a non-negative function within the integration interval)
Note: Since the sequence <math>\ (W_n)</math> is decreasing and bounded below by 0, it converges to a non-negative limit. Indeed, the limit is non-zero (see below).
 
== Recurrence relation, evaluating the Wallis' integrals ==
 
By means of [[integration by parts]],
an interesting [[recurrence relation]] can be obtained:
: Noting that for all real <math>x</math>, <math>\quad \sin^2(x) = 1-\cos^2(x)</math>, we have, for all natural numbers <math>n \geqslant 2</math>,
 
:<math>\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \sin^{n}(x)\,dx = \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \sin^{n-2}(x) \left[1-\cos^2(x)\right]\,dx</math>
 
:<math>\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \sin^{n}(x)\,dx = \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \sin^{n-2}(x)\,dx - \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \sin^{n-2}(x) \cos^2(x)\,dx</math> (equation <math>\mathbf{(1)}</math>)
 
Integrating the second integral by parts, with:
:* <math>u'(x)=\cos (x) \sin^{n-2}(x)</math>, whose [[anti-derivative]] is <math>u(x) = \frac{1}{n-1} \sin^{n-1}(x)</math>
:* <math>v(x)=\cos (x)</math>, whose [[derivative]] is <math> v'(x) =  - \sin(x)</math>
we have:
:<math>\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \sin^{n-2}(x) \cos^2(x)\,dx = \left[ \frac{1}{n-1} \sin^{n-1}(x) \cos(x)\right]_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} + \int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}} \ \frac{1}{n-1} \sin^{n-1}(x) \sin(x)\,dx = 0 + {1\over {n-1}}\,W_{n} </math>
 
Substituting this result into <math>\mathbf{(1)}</math> gives:
:<math>W_n=W_{n-2} - {1\over {n-1}}\,W_{n}</math>
and thus
:<math> \qquad \left(1+ \frac{1}{n-1}\right)W_n=W_{n-2}</math> (equation <math>\mathbf{(2)}</math>)
 
This gives the well-known identity:
 
:<math>n\,W_n = (n-1)\,W_{n-2}\qquad \,</math>, valid for all <math>n \geqslant 2\qquad \,</math>.
 
This is a recurrence relation giving <math>W_n</math> in terms of <math>W_{n-2}</math>.
This, together with the values of <math>W_0</math> and <math>W_1</math>,
give us two sets of formulae for the terms in the sequence <math>\ (W_n)</math>,
depending on whether <math>n</math> is odd or even.
 
* for <math>\quad n=2\,p</math>, <math>\quad W_{2\,p}=\frac{2\,p-1}{2\,p}\times\frac{2\,p-3}{2\,p-2}\times\cdots\times\frac{1}{2}\,W_0=\frac{2\,p}{2\,p}\times\frac{2\,p-1}{2\,p}\times\frac{2\,p-2}{2\,p-2}\times\frac{2\,p-3}{2\,p-2}\times\cdots\times\frac{2}{2}\times\frac{1}{2}\,W_0 = \frac{(2\,p)!}{2^{2\,p}\, (p!)^2} \frac{\pi}{2}</math>
* for <math>\quad n=2\,p+1</math>, <math>\quad W_{2\,p+1}=\frac{2\,p}{2\,p+1}\,\frac{2\,p-2}{2\,p-1}\cdots\frac{2}{3}\,W_1=\frac{2^{2\,p}\, (p!)^2}{(2\,p +1)!}~</math>
Note that all the even terms are irrational,
whereas the odd terms are all rational.
 
== Equivalence ==
 
* From the recurrence formula above <math>\mathbf{(2)}</math>, we can deduce that
:<math>\ W_{n + 1} \sim W_n</math> (equivalence of two sequences).
 
:Indeed, for all <math>n \in\, \mathbb{N}</math> :
:<math>\ W_{n + 2} \leqslant W_{n + 1} \leqslant W_n</math> (since the sequence is decreasing)
:<math>\frac{W_{n + 2}}{W_n} \leqslant \frac{W_{n + 1}}{W_n} \leqslant 1</math> (since <math>\ W_n > 0</math>)
:<math>\frac{n + 1}{n + 2} \leqslant \frac{W_{n + 1}}{W_n} \leqslant 1</math> (by equation <math>\mathbf{(2)}</math>).
:By the [[sandwich theorem]], we conclude that <math>\frac{W_{n + 1}}{W_n} \to 1</math>, and hence <math>\ W_{n + 1} \sim W_n</math>.
 
*By examining <math>W_nW_{n+1}</math>, one obtains the following equivalence:
 
:<math>W_n \sim \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2\, n}}\quad</math> ( and consequently <math>\quad\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \sqrt n\,W_n=\sqrt{\pi /2}\quad </math> ).
{{Hidden|Proof|
For all <math>n \in\, \mathbb{N}</math>, let <math>u_n = (n + 1)\, W_n\, W_{n + 1}</math>.
 
It turns out that, <math>\forall n\in \N,\, u_{n + 1} = u_n</math> because of equation <math>\mathbf{(2)}</math>.
In other words <math>\ (u_n)</math> is a constant.
 
It follows that for all <math>n \in\, \mathbb{N}</math>,
<math>u_n = u_0 = W_0\, W_1 = \frac{\pi}{2}</math>.
 
Now, since <math>\ n + 1 \sim n</math> and <math>\ W_{n + 1} \sim W_n</math>, we have, by the product rules of equivalents, <math>\ u_n \sim n\, W_n^2</math>.
 
Thus, <math>\ n\, W_n^2 \sim \frac{\pi}{2}</math>,
from which the desired result follows
(noting that <math>\ W_n > 0</math>).
}}
 
== Deducing Stirling's formula ==
 
Suppose that we have the following equivalence
(known as [[Stirling's formula]])
:<math>\ n\,! \sim C\, \sqrt{n}\left(\frac{n}{\mathrm{e}}\right)^n</math>, where <math>\ C \in \R^*</math>.
We now want to determine the value of this constant <math>\ C</math>
using the formula for <math>W_{2\, p}</math>.
*From above, we know that:
:<math>W_{2\, p} \sim \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{4\, p}} = \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2}\, \frac{1}{\sqrt{p}}</math> (equation <math>\mathbf{(3)}</math>)
*Expanding <math>W_{2\,p}</math> and using the formula above for the factorials, we get:
:<math>W_{2\,p}=\frac{(2\,p)!}{2^{2\,p}\, (p\,!)^2}\, \frac{\pi}{2} \sim \frac{C\, \left(\frac{2\, p}{\mathrm{e}}\right)^{2p}\, \sqrt{2\, p}}{2^{2p}\, C^2\,  \left(\frac{p}{\mathrm{e}}\right)^{2p}\, \left(\sqrt{p}\right)^2}\, \frac{\pi}{2} </math> and hence:
:<math>W_{2\,p} \sim \frac{\pi}{C\, \sqrt{2}}\, \frac{1}{\sqrt{p}}</math> (equation <math>\mathbf{(4)}</math>)
:From  <math>\mathbf{(3)}</math> and <math>\mathbf{(4)}</math>, we obtain, by transitivity,
:<math>\frac{\pi}{C\, \sqrt{2}}\, \frac{1}{\sqrt{p}} \sim \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2}\, \frac{1}{\sqrt{p}}</math>, which gives :
:<math>\frac{\pi}{C\, \sqrt{2}} = \frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{2}</math>, and hence <math>C = \sqrt{2\, \pi}</math>.
 
:We have thus proved Stirling's formula:
:<math>\ n\,! \sim \sqrt{2\, \pi\, n}\, \left(\frac{n}{\mathrm{e}}\right)^n</math>.
 
== Evaluating the Gaussian Integral ==
 
The [[Gaussian integral]] can be evaluated through the use of Wallis' integrals.
 
We first prove the following inequalities:
*<math>\forall n\in \mathbb N^* \quad \forall u\in\mathbb R_+ \quad u\leqslant n\quad\Rightarrow\quad (1-u/n)^n\leqslant e^{-u}</math>
*<math>\forall n\in \mathbb N^* \quad \forall u \in\mathbb R_+ \qquad e^{-u} \leqslant  (1+u/n)^{-n} </math>
In fact, letting <math>\quad u/n=t</math>,
the first inequality (in which <math>t \in [0,1]</math>) is
equivalent to <math>1-t\leqslant e^{-t}</math>;
whereas the second inequality reduces to
<math>e^{-t}\leqslant (1+t)^{-1}</math>,
which becomes <math>e^t\geqslant 1+t </math>.
These 2 latter inequalities follow from the convexity of the
exponential function
(or from an analysis of the function <math>t \mapsto e^t -1 -t</math>).
 
Letting <math>u=x^2</math> and
making use of the basic properties of improper integrals
(the convergence of the integrals is obvious),
we obtain the inequalities:
 
<math> \int_0^{\sqrt n}(1-x^2/n)^n dx \leqslant \int_0^{\sqrt n} e^{-x^2} dx \leqslant \int_0^{+\infty} e^{-x^2} dx \leqslant \int_0^{+\infty} (1+x^2/n)^{-n} dx</math>
for use with the [[sandwich theorem]] (as <math>n \to \infty</math>).
 
The first and last integrals can be evaluated easily using
Wallis' integrals.
For the first one, let <math> x=\sqrt n\, \sin\,t </math>
(t varying from 0 to <math>\pi /2</math>).
Then, the integral becomes <math>\sqrt n \,W_{2n+1}</math>.
For the last integral, let <math>x=\sqrt n\, \tan\, t</math>
(t varying from <math>0</math> to <math>\pi /2</math>).
Then, it becomes <math>\sqrt n \,W_{2n-2}</math>.
 
As we have shown before,
<math> \lim_{n\rightarrow +\infty} \sqrt n\;W_n=\sqrt{\pi /2}</math>. So, it follows that
<math>\int_0^{+\infty} e^{-x^2} dx = \sqrt{\pi} /2</math>.
 
Remark: There are other methods of evaluating the Gaussian integral.
Some of them are [[Gaussian integral#Computation|more direct]].
 
== Relation with the Beta and Gamma functions ==
 
One of the definitions of the [[Beta function]] reads:
:<math>
\Beta(x,y) =
2\int_0^{\pi/2}(\sin\theta)^{2x-1}(\cos\theta)^{2y-1}\,d\theta,
\qquad \mathrm{Re}(x)>0,\ \mathrm{Re}(y)>0 \!
</math>
Putting <math>x = \frac{n+1}{2}</math>, <math>y = \frac{1}{2}</math> into this equation gives us an expression of the Wallis' integrals in terms of the Beta function:
:<math>
\Beta \left( \frac{n+1}{2},\frac{1}{2} \right) =
2\int_0^{\pi/2}(\sin\theta)^{n}(\cos\theta)^{0}\,d\theta
= 2\int_0^{\pi/2}(\sin\theta)^{n}\,d\theta
= 2 W_n
</math>
or equivalently,
:<math>
W_n = \frac{1}{2} \Beta \left( \frac{n+1}{2},\frac{1}{2} \right)
</math>.
 
Exploiting the identity relating the Beta function to [[Gamma function]]:
:<math>
\Beta(x,y)=
\dfrac{\Gamma(x)\,\Gamma(y)}{\Gamma(x+y)}
</math>
We can rewrite the above in terms of the Gamma function:
:<math>
W_n
    = \frac{1}{2} \frac{\Gamma \left( \frac{n+1}{2} \right)
                        \Gamma \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)
                  }{
                    \Gamma \left( \frac{n+1}{2} + \frac{1}{2} \right)
                  }
    =            \frac{\Gamma \left( \frac{n+1}{2} \right)
                        \Gamma \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)
                  }{
                    2 \, \Gamma \left( \frac{n+2}{2} \right)
                  }
</math>
So, for odd <math>n</math>, writing <math>n = 2p+1</math>, we have:
:<math>
W_{2p+1}
    =            \frac{\Gamma \left( p+1 \right)
                        \Gamma \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)
                  }{
                    2 \, \Gamma \left( p+1 + \frac{1}{2} \right)
                  }
    =            \frac{p!
                        \Gamma \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)
                  }{
                    (2p+1) \, \Gamma \left( p + \frac{1}{2} \right)
                  }
    =            \frac{2^p \; p!
                  }{
                    (2p+1)!!
                  }
    =            \frac{4^p \; (p!)^2
                  }{
                    (2p+1)!
                  }
</math>
whereas for even <math>n</math>, writing <math>n = 2p</math>, we get:
:<math>
W_{2p}
    =            \frac{\Gamma \left( p + \frac{1}{2} \right)
                        \Gamma \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)
                  }{
                    2 \, \Gamma \left( p+1 \right)
                  }
    =            \frac{(2p-1)!! \; \pi
                  }{
                    2^{p+1} \; p!
                  }
    =            \frac{(2p)!
                  }{
                    4^p \; (p!)^2
                  }
  \cdot
  \frac{\pi}{2}
</math>
 
== Note ==
 
The same properties lead to [[Wallis product]],
which expresses <math>\frac{\pi}{2}\,</math>
(see [[Pi|<math>\pi</math>]])
in the form of an [[infinite product]].
 
== External links ==
* Pascal Sebah and Xavier Gourdon.  ''Introduction to the Gamma Function''.  In [http://numbers.computation.free.fr/Constants/Miscellaneous/gammaFunction.ps PostScript] and [http://numbers.computation.free.fr/Constants/Miscellaneous/gammaFunction.html HTML] formats.
 
{{Analysis-footer}}
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Wallis' Integrals}}
[[Category:Integrals]]

Revision as of 23:30, 25 January 2014

In mathematics, and more precisely in analysis, the Wallis' integrals constitute a family of integrals introduced by John Wallis.

Definition, basic properties

The Wallis' integrals are the terms of the sequence (Wn)n defined by:

Wn=0π2sinn(x)dx,

or equivalently (through a substitution: x=π2t):

Wn=0π2cosn(x)dx

In particular, the first two terms of this sequence are:

W0=π2 and W1=1

The sequence (Wn) is decreasing and has strictly positive terms. In fact, for all n :

(by the linearity of integration and because the last integral is an integral of a non-negative function within the integration interval)

Note: Since the sequence (Wn) is decreasing and bounded below by 0, it converges to a non-negative limit. Indeed, the limit is non-zero (see below).

Recurrence relation, evaluating the Wallis' integrals

By means of integration by parts, an interesting recurrence relation can be obtained:

Noting that for all real x, sin2(x)=1cos2(x), we have, for all natural numbers n2,
0π2sinn(x)dx=0π2sinn2(x)[1cos2(x)]dx
0π2sinn(x)dx=0π2sinn2(x)dx0π2sinn2(x)cos2(x)dx (equation (1))

Integrating the second integral by parts, with:

we have:

0π2sinn2(x)cos2(x)dx=[1n1sinn1(x)cos(x)]0π2+0π21n1sinn1(x)sin(x)dx=0+1n1Wn

Substituting this result into (1) gives:

Wn=Wn21n1Wn

and thus

(1+1n1)Wn=Wn2 (equation (2))

This gives the well-known identity:

nWn=(n1)Wn2, valid for all n2.

This is a recurrence relation giving Wn in terms of Wn2. This, together with the values of W0 and W1, give us two sets of formulae for the terms in the sequence (Wn), depending on whether n is odd or even.

Note that all the even terms are irrational, whereas the odd terms are all rational.

Equivalence

  • From the recurrence formula above (2), we can deduce that
Wn+1Wn (equivalence of two sequences).
Indeed, for all n :
Wn+2Wn+1Wn (since the sequence is decreasing)
Wn+2WnWn+1Wn1 (since Wn>0)
n+1n+2Wn+1Wn1 (by equation (2)).
By the sandwich theorem, we conclude that Wn+1Wn1, and hence Wn+1Wn.
  • By examining WnWn+1, one obtains the following equivalence:
Wnπ2n ( and consequently limnnWn=π/2 ).

Template:Hidden

Deducing Stirling's formula

Suppose that we have the following equivalence (known as Stirling's formula)

n!Cn(ne)n, where C*.

We now want to determine the value of this constant C using the formula for W2p.

  • From above, we know that:
W2pπ4p=π21p (equation (3))
  • Expanding W2p and using the formula above for the factorials, we get:
W2p=(2p)!22p(p!)2π2C(2pe)2p2p22pC2(pe)2p(p)2π2 and hence:
W2pπC21p (equation (4))
From (3) and (4), we obtain, by transitivity,
πC21pπ21p, which gives :
πC2=π2, and hence C=2π.
We have thus proved Stirling's formula:
n!2πn(ne)n.

Evaluating the Gaussian Integral

The Gaussian integral can be evaluated through the use of Wallis' integrals.

We first prove the following inequalities:

In fact, letting u/n=t, the first inequality (in which t[0,1]) is equivalent to 1tet; whereas the second inequality reduces to et(1+t)1, which becomes et1+t. These 2 latter inequalities follow from the convexity of the exponential function (or from an analysis of the function tet1t).

Letting u=x2 and making use of the basic properties of improper integrals (the convergence of the integrals is obvious), we obtain the inequalities:

0n(1x2/n)ndx0nex2dx0+ex2dx0+(1+x2/n)ndx for use with the sandwich theorem (as n).

The first and last integrals can be evaluated easily using Wallis' integrals. For the first one, let x=nsint (t varying from 0 to π/2). Then, the integral becomes nW2n+1. For the last integral, let x=ntant (t varying from 0 to π/2). Then, it becomes nW2n2.

As we have shown before, limn+nWn=π/2. So, it follows that 0+ex2dx=π/2.

Remark: There are other methods of evaluating the Gaussian integral. Some of them are more direct.

Relation with the Beta and Gamma functions

One of the definitions of the Beta function reads:

B(x,y)=20π/2(sinθ)2x1(cosθ)2y1dθ,Re(x)>0,Re(y)>0

Putting x=n+12, y=12 into this equation gives us an expression of the Wallis' integrals in terms of the Beta function:

B(n+12,12)=20π/2(sinθ)n(cosθ)0dθ=20π/2(sinθ)ndθ=2Wn

or equivalently,

Wn=12B(n+12,12).

Exploiting the identity relating the Beta function to Gamma function:

B(x,y)=Γ(x)Γ(y)Γ(x+y)

We can rewrite the above in terms of the Gamma function:

Wn=12Γ(n+12)Γ(12)Γ(n+12+12)=Γ(n+12)Γ(12)2Γ(n+22)

So, for odd n, writing n=2p+1, we have:

W2p+1=Γ(p+1)Γ(12)2Γ(p+1+12)=p!Γ(12)(2p+1)Γ(p+12)=2pp!(2p+1)!!=4p(p!)2(2p+1)!

whereas for even n, writing n=2p, we get:

W2p=Γ(p+12)Γ(12)2Γ(p+1)=(2p1)!!π2p+1p!=(2p)!4p(p!)2π2

Note

The same properties lead to Wallis product, which expresses π2 (see π) in the form of an infinite product.

External links

  • Pascal Sebah and Xavier Gourdon. Introduction to the Gamma Function. In PostScript and HTML formats.

Template:Analysis-footer