Main Page: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Semiclassical gravity''' is the approximation to the theory of [[quantum gravity]] in which one treats [[Field (physics)|matter fields]] as being quantum and the [[Gravitation|gravitational field]] as being classical.
In contexts including [[complex manifold]]s and [[algebraic geometry]], a '''logarithmic''' [[differential form]] is a meromorphic differential form with [[pole (complex analysis)|poles]] of a certain kind.


In semiclassical gravity, matter is represented by quantum matter fields that propagate according to the theory of [[quantum field theory in curved spacetime|quantum fields in curved spacetime]]. The spacetime in which the fields propagate is classical but dynamical. The curvature of the spacetime is given by the ''semiclassical Einstein equations'', which relate the curvature of the spacetime, given by the [[Einstein tensor]] <math>G_{\mu\nu}</math>, to the expectation value of the [[Stress–energy tensor|energy–momentum tensor]] operator, <math>T_{\mu\nu}</math>, of the matter fields:
Let ''X'' be a complex manifold, and ''D'' ⊂ ''X'' a [[divisor]] and ω a holomorphic ''p''-form on ''X''−''D''. If ω and ''d''ω have a pole of order at most one along ''D'', then ω is said to have a logarithmic pole along ''D''. ω is also known as a logarithmic ''p''-form. The logarithmic ''p''-forms make up a [[Sheaf (mathematics)|subsheaf]] of the meromorphic ''p''-forms on ''X'' with a pole along ''D'', denoted


:<math> G_{\mu\nu} = \frac{ 8 \pi G }{ c^4 } \left\langle \hat T_{\mu\nu} \right\rangle_\psi </math>
:<math>\Omega^p_X(\log D).</math>


where ''G'' is [[Gravitational constant|Newton's constant]] and <math>\psi</math> indicates the quantum state of the matter fields.
In the theory of [[Riemann surfaces]], one encounters logarithmic one-forms which have the local expression


==Stress–energy tensor==
:<math>\omega = \frac{df}{f} =\left(\frac{m}{z} + \frac{g'(z)}{g(z)}\right)dz</math>
There is some ambiguity in regulating the stress–energy tensor, and this depends upon the curvature. This ambiguity can be absorbed into the [[cosmological constant]], [[Newton's constant]], and the [[f(R) gravity|quadratic couplings]]<ref>See Wald (1994) Chapter 4, section 6 "The Stress-Energy Tensor".</ref>
:<math>\int d^dx \,\sqrt{-g} R^2</math> and <math>\int d^dx\, \sqrt{-g} R^{\mu\nu}R_{\mu\nu}</math>.
There's also the other quadratic term
:<math>\int d^dx\, \sqrt{-g} R^{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}R_{\mu\nu\rho\sigma}</math>,
but (in 4-dimensions) this term is a linear combination of the other two terms and a surface term. See [[Gauss–Bonnet gravity]] for more details.


Since the theory of quantum gravity is not yet known, it is difficult to say what is the regime of validity of semiclassical gravity. However, one can formally show that semiclassical gravity could be deduced from quantum gravity by considering ''N'' copies of the quantum matter fields, and taking the limit of ''N'' going to infinity while keeping the product ''GN'' constant. At diagrammatic level, semiclassical gravity corresponds to summing all [[Feynman diagram]]s which do not have loops of gravitons (but have an arbitrary number of matter loops). Semiclassical gravity can also be deduced from an axiomatic approach.
for some [[meromorphic function]] (resp. [[rational function]]) <math> f(z) = z^mg(z) </math>, where ''g'' is holomorphic and non-vanishing at 0, and ''m'' is the order of ''f'' at ''0''.. That is, for some [[open covering]], there are local representations of this differential form as a [[logarithmic derivative]] (modified slightly with the [[exterior derivative]] ''d'' in place of the usual [[differential operator]] ''d/dz''). Observe that ω has only simple poles with integer residues. On higher-dimensional complex manifolds, the [[Poincaré residue]] is used to describe the distinctive behavior of logarithmic forms along poles.


==Experimental status==
==Holomorphic log complex==
There are cases where semiclassical gravity breaks down. For instance,<ref>See Page and Geilker; Eppley and Hannah; Albers, Kiefer, and Reginatto.</ref> if ''M'' is a huge mass, then the superposition
By definition of <math>\Omega^p_X(\log D)</math> and the fact that exterior differentiation ''d'' satisfies ''d''<sup>2</sup> = 0, one has
:<math>\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( \left| M \text{ at } A \right\rangle + \left| M \text{ at } B \right\rangle \right)</math>
:<math> d\Omega^p_X(\log D)(U)\subset \Omega^{p+1}_X(\log D)(U) </math>.
where ''A'' and ''B'' are widely separated, then the expectation value of the stress–energy tensor is ''M/2'' at ''A'' and ''M/2'' at ''B'', but we would never observe the metric sourced by such a distribution. Instead, we [[decohere]] into a state with the metric sourced at ''A'' and another sourced at ''B'' with a 50% chance each.
This implies that there is a complex of sheaves <math>( \Omega^{\bullet}_X(\log D), d) </math>, known as the ''holomorphic log complex'' corresponding to the divisor ''D''. This is a subcomplex  of <math> j_*\Omega^{\bullet}_{X-D} </math>, where <math> j:X-D\rightarrow X </math> is the inclusion and <math> \Omega^{\bullet}_{X-D} </math> is the complex of sheaves of holomorphic forms on ''X''''D''.


==Applications==
Of special interest is the case where ''D'' has simple [[normal crossings]]. Then if <math> \{D_{\nu}\} </math> are the smooth, irreducible components of ''D'', one has <math> D = \sum D_{\nu} </math> with the <math> D_{\nu} </math> meeting transversely. Locally ''D'' is the union of hyperplanes, with local defining equations of the form <math> z_1\cdots z_k = 0 </math> in some holomorphic coordinates. One can show that the stalk of <math> \Omega^1_X(\log D) </math> at ''p'' satisfies<ref name="foo">Chris A.M. Peters; Joseph H.M. Steenbrink (2007). Mixed Hodge Structures. Springer. ISBN 978-3-540-77015-6 {{Please check ISBN|reason=Check digit (6) does not correspond to calculated figure.}}</ref>
The most important applications of semiclassical gravity are to understand the [[Hawking radiation]] of [[black hole]]s and the generation of random gaussian-distributed perturbations in the theory of [[cosmic inflation]], which is thought to occur at the very beginnings of the [[Big Bang|big bang]].
:<math>\Omega_X^1(\log D)_p = \mathcal{O}_{X,p}\frac{dz_1}{z_1}\oplus\cdots\oplus\mathcal{O}_{X,p}\frac{dz_k}{z_k} \oplus \mathcal{O}_{X,p}dz_{k+1} \oplus \cdots \oplus \mathcal{O}_{X,p}dz_n</math>
and that
:<math> \Omega_X^k(\log D)_p = \bigwedge^k_{j=1} \Omega_X^1(\log D)_p </math>.
Some authors, e.g.,<ref name = "foo2">Phillip A. Griffiths; Joseph Harris (1979). Principles of Algebraic Geometry. Wiley-Interscience. ISBN 0-471-05059-8.</ref> use the term ''log complex'' to refer to the holomorphic log complex corresponding to a divisor with normal crossings.


==Notes==
===Higher-dimensional example===
{{Reflist}}
Consider a once-punctured elliptic curve, given as the locus ''D'' of complex points (''x'',''y'') satisfying <math> g(x,y) = y^2 - f(x) = 0 </math>, where <math>f(x) = x(x-1)(x-\lambda) </math> and <math> \lambda\neq 0,1 </math> is a complex number. Then ''D'' is a smooth irreducible [[hypersurface]] in '''C'''<sup>2</sup> and, in particular, a divisor with simple normal crossings. There is a meromorphic two-form on '''C'''<sup>2</sup>
:<math> \omega =\frac{dx\wedge dy}{g(x,y)} </math>
which has a simple pole along ''D''. The Poincaré residue <ref name = "foo2"/> of ω along ''D'' is given by the holomorphic one-form
:<math> \text{Res}_D(\omega) = \frac{dy}{\partial g/\partial x}|_D =-\frac{dx}{\partial g/\partial y}|_D = -\frac{1}{2}\frac{dx}{y}|_D </math>.
Vital to the residue theory of logarithmic forms is the [[Gysin sequence]], which is in some sense a generalization of the [[Residue Theorem]] for compact Riemann surfaces. This can be used to show, for example, that <math>dx/y|_D </math> extends to a holomorphic one-form on the [[Projective space#Projective space and affine space|projective closure]] of ''D'' in '''P'''<sup>2</sup>, a smooth elliptic curve.
 
=== Hodge theory ===
The holomorphic log complex can be brought to bear on the [[Hodge theory]] of complex algebraic varieties. Let ''X'' be a complex algebraic manifold and <math> j: X\hookrightarrow Y </math> a good compactification. This means that ''Y'' is a compact algebraic manifold and ''D'' = ''Y''−''X'' is a divisor on ''Y'' with simple normal crossings. The natural inclusion of complexes of sheaves
:<math> \Omega^{\bullet}_Y(\log D)\rightarrow j_*\Omega_{X}^{\bullet} </math>
turns out to be a quasi-isomorphism.  Thus
:<math> H^k(X;\mathbf{C}) = \mathbb{H}^k(Y, \Omega^{\bullet}_Y(\log D))</math>
where <math>\mathbb{H}^{\bullet}</math> denotes [[hypercohomology]] of a complex of abelian sheaves. There is<ref name="foo"/> a decreasing filtration <math>W_{\bullet} \Omega^p_Y(\log D) </math> given by
:<math>W_{m}\Omega^p_Y(\log D) =  \begin{cases}
0 & m < 0\\
\Omega^p_Y(\log D) & m\geq p \\
\Omega^{p-m}_Y\wedge \Omega^m_Y(\log D) & 0\leq m \leq p
\end{cases} </math>
which, along with the trivial  increasing filtration <math>F^{\bullet}\Omega^p_Y(\log D) </math> on logarithmic ''p''-forms, produces filtrations on cohomology
:<math> W_mH^k(X; \mathbf{C}) = \text{Im}(\mathbb{H}^k(Y, W_{m-k}\Omega^{\bullet}_Y(\log D))\rightarrow H^k(X; \mathbf{C})) </math>
:<math> F^pH^k(X; \mathbf{C}) = \text{Im}(\mathbb{H}^k(Y, F^p\Omega^{\bullet}_Y(\log D))\rightarrow H^k(X; \mathbf{C})) </math>.
One shows<ref name="foo"/> that <math> W_mH^k(X; \mathbf{C}) </math> can actually be defined over '''Q'''. Then the filtrations <math> W_{\bullet}, F^{\bullet}</math> on cohomology give rise to a mixed Hodge structure on <math> H^k(X; \mathbf{Z}) </math>.
 
Classically, for example in [[elliptic function]] theory, the logarithmic differential forms were recognised as complementary to the [[differentials of the first kind]]. They were sometimes called ''differentials of the second kind'' (and, with an unfortunate inconsistency, also sometimes ''of the third kind''). The classical theory has now been subsumed as an aspect of Hodge theory. For a Riemann surface ''S'', for example, the differentials of the first kind account for the term ''H''<sup>1,0</sup> in ''H''<sup>1</sup>(''S''), when by the [[Dolbeault isomorphism]] it is interpreted as the [[sheaf cohomology]] group ''H''<sup>0</sup>(''S'',Ω); this is tautologous considering their definition. The ''H''<sup>1,0</sup> direct summand in ''H''<sup>1</sup>(''S''), as well as being interpreted as ''H''<sup>1</sup>(''S'',O) where O is the sheaf of [[holomorphic function]]s on ''S'', can be identified more concretely with a vector space of logarithmic differentials.
 
==See also==
*[[Algebraic Geometry]]
*[[Adjunction formula]]
*[[Differential of the first kind]]
*[[Residue Theorem]]


==References==
==References==
* Birrell, N. D. and Davies, P. C. W., ''Quantum fields in curved space'', (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1982).
{{Reflist}}
* Don N. Page, and C. D. Geilker, "Indirect Evidence for Quantum Gravity."  ''Phys. Rev. Lett.'' '''47''' (1981) 979–982. DOI:[http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.979 10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.979]
* K. Eppley and E. Hannah, "The necessity of quantizing the gravitational field." ''Found. Phys.'' '''7''' (1977) 51–68. [[Digital object identifier|doi]]:[http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00715241 10.1007/BF00715241]
* Mark Albers, Claus Kiefer, Marcel Reginatto, "Measurement Analysis and Quantum Gravity." ''Phys.Rev.D'' '''78''' 6 (2008) 064051, [http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.78.064051 DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.064051]. Eprint [http://arxiv.org/abs/0802.1978 arXiv:0802.1978] [gr-qc].
* Robert M. Wald, ''Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime and Black Hole Thermodynamics''. University of Chicago Press, 1994.
*[http://xstructure.inr.ac.ru/x-bin/theme3.py?level=1&index1=-43587 Semiclassical gravity on arxiv.org]
 
{{theories of gravitation}}
{{quantum gravity}}


[[Category:Theories of gravitation]]
[[Category:Complex analysis]]
[[Category:Quantum field theory]]
[[Category:Algebraic geometry]]
[[Category:Quantum gravity]]

Revision as of 03:56, 13 August 2014

In contexts including complex manifolds and algebraic geometry, a logarithmic differential form is a meromorphic differential form with poles of a certain kind.

Let X be a complex manifold, and DX a divisor and ω a holomorphic p-form on XD. If ω and dω have a pole of order at most one along D, then ω is said to have a logarithmic pole along D. ω is also known as a logarithmic p-form. The logarithmic p-forms make up a subsheaf of the meromorphic p-forms on X with a pole along D, denoted

ΩXp(logD).

In the theory of Riemann surfaces, one encounters logarithmic one-forms which have the local expression

ω=dff=(mz+g(z)g(z))dz

for some meromorphic function (resp. rational function) f(z)=zmg(z), where g is holomorphic and non-vanishing at 0, and m is the order of f at 0.. That is, for some open covering, there are local representations of this differential form as a logarithmic derivative (modified slightly with the exterior derivative d in place of the usual differential operator d/dz). Observe that ω has only simple poles with integer residues. On higher-dimensional complex manifolds, the Poincaré residue is used to describe the distinctive behavior of logarithmic forms along poles.

Holomorphic log complex

By definition of ΩXp(logD) and the fact that exterior differentiation d satisfies d2 = 0, one has

dΩXp(logD)(U)ΩXp+1(logD)(U).

This implies that there is a complex of sheaves (ΩX(logD),d), known as the holomorphic log complex corresponding to the divisor D. This is a subcomplex of j*ΩXD, where j:XDX is the inclusion and ΩXD is the complex of sheaves of holomorphic forms on XD.

Of special interest is the case where D has simple normal crossings. Then if {Dν} are the smooth, irreducible components of D, one has D=Dν with the Dν meeting transversely. Locally D is the union of hyperplanes, with local defining equations of the form z1zk=0 in some holomorphic coordinates. One can show that the stalk of ΩX1(logD) at p satisfies[1]

ΩX1(logD)p=𝒪X,pdz1z1𝒪X,pdzkzk𝒪X,pdzk+1𝒪X,pdzn

and that

ΩXk(logD)p=j=1kΩX1(logD)p.

Some authors, e.g.,[2] use the term log complex to refer to the holomorphic log complex corresponding to a divisor with normal crossings.

Higher-dimensional example

Consider a once-punctured elliptic curve, given as the locus D of complex points (x,y) satisfying g(x,y)=y2f(x)=0, where f(x)=x(x1)(xλ) and λ0,1 is a complex number. Then D is a smooth irreducible hypersurface in C2 and, in particular, a divisor with simple normal crossings. There is a meromorphic two-form on C2

ω=dxdyg(x,y)

which has a simple pole along D. The Poincaré residue [2] of ω along D is given by the holomorphic one-form

ResD(ω)=dyg/x|D=dxg/y|D=12dxy|D.

Vital to the residue theory of logarithmic forms is the Gysin sequence, which is in some sense a generalization of the Residue Theorem for compact Riemann surfaces. This can be used to show, for example, that dx/y|D extends to a holomorphic one-form on the projective closure of D in P2, a smooth elliptic curve.

Hodge theory

The holomorphic log complex can be brought to bear on the Hodge theory of complex algebraic varieties. Let X be a complex algebraic manifold and j:XY a good compactification. This means that Y is a compact algebraic manifold and D = YX is a divisor on Y with simple normal crossings. The natural inclusion of complexes of sheaves

ΩY(logD)j*ΩX

turns out to be a quasi-isomorphism. Thus

Hk(X;C)=k(Y,ΩY(logD))

where denotes hypercohomology of a complex of abelian sheaves. There is[1] a decreasing filtration WΩYp(logD) given by

WmΩYp(logD)={0m<0ΩYp(logD)mpΩYpmΩYm(logD)0mp

which, along with the trivial increasing filtration FΩYp(logD) on logarithmic p-forms, produces filtrations on cohomology

WmHk(X;C)=Im(k(Y,WmkΩY(logD))Hk(X;C))
FpHk(X;C)=Im(k(Y,FpΩY(logD))Hk(X;C)).

One shows[1] that WmHk(X;C) can actually be defined over Q. Then the filtrations W,F on cohomology give rise to a mixed Hodge structure on Hk(X;Z).

Classically, for example in elliptic function theory, the logarithmic differential forms were recognised as complementary to the differentials of the first kind. They were sometimes called differentials of the second kind (and, with an unfortunate inconsistency, also sometimes of the third kind). The classical theory has now been subsumed as an aspect of Hodge theory. For a Riemann surface S, for example, the differentials of the first kind account for the term H1,0 in H1(S), when by the Dolbeault isomorphism it is interpreted as the sheaf cohomology group H0(S,Ω); this is tautologous considering their definition. The H1,0 direct summand in H1(S), as well as being interpreted as H1(S,O) where O is the sheaf of holomorphic functions on S, can be identified more concretely with a vector space of logarithmic differentials.

See also

References

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Chris A.M. Peters; Joseph H.M. Steenbrink (2007). Mixed Hodge Structures. Springer. ISBN 978-3-540-77015-6 Template:Please check ISBN
  2. 2.0 2.1 Phillip A. Griffiths; Joseph Harris (1979). Principles of Algebraic Geometry. Wiley-Interscience. ISBN 0-471-05059-8.