Fernique's theorem
Population stratification is the presence of a systematic difference in allele frequencies between subpopulations in a population possibly due to different ancestry, especially in the context of association studies. Population stratification is also referred to as population structure, in this context.
Causes of population stratification
The basic cause of population stratification is nonrandom mating between groups, often due to their physical separation (e.g., for populations of African and European descent) followed by genetic drift of allele frequencies in each group. In some contemporary populations there has been recent admixture between individuals from different populations, leading to populations in which ancestry is variable (as in African Americans). Over tens of generations, random mating can eliminate this type of stratification. In some parts of the globe (e.g., in Europe), population structure is best modeled by isolation-by-distance, in which allele frequencies tend to vary smoothly with location.
Population stratification and association studies
Population stratification can be a problem for association studies, such as case-control studies, where the association found could be due to the underlying structure of the population and not a disease associated locus. By analogy, one might imagine a scenario in which certain small beads are made out of a certain type of unique foam, and that children tend to choke on these beads; one might wrongly conclude that the foam material causes choking when in fact it is the small size of the beads. Also the real disease causing locus might not be found in the study if the locus is less prevalent in the population where the case subjects are chosen. For this reason, it was common in the 1990s to use family-based data where the effect of population stratification can easily be controlled for using methods such as the TDT. But if the structure is known or a putative structure is found, there are a number of possible ways to implement this structure in the association studies and thus compensate for any population bias. Most contemporary genome-wide association studies take the view that the problem of population stratification is manageable,[1] and that the logistic advantages of using unrelated cases and controls make these studies preferable to family-based association studies.
The two most widely used approaches to this problem include genomic control, which is a relatively nonparametric method for controlling the inflation of test statistics,[2] and structured association methods,[3] which use genetic information to estimate and control for population structure. Currently, the most widely used structured association method is Eigenstrat, developed by Alkes Price and colleagues.[4]
Genomic Control
The assumption of population homogeneity in association studies, especially case-control studies, can easily be violated and can lead to both type I and type II errors. It is therefore important for the models used in the study to compensate for the population structure. The problem in case control studies is that if there is a genetic involvement in the disease, the case population is more likely to be related than the individuals in the control population. This means that the assumption of independence of observations is violated. Often this will lead to an overestimation of the significance of an association but it depends on the way the sample was chosen. As long as there is a higher allele frequency in a subpopulation you will find association with any trait more prevalent in the case population.[5] This kind of spurious association increases as the sample population grows so the problem should be of special concern in large scale association studies when loci only cause relatively small effects on the trait. A method that in some cases can compensate for the above described problems has been developed by Devlin and Roeder (1999).[6] It uses both a frequentist and a Bayesian approach (the latter being appropriate when dealing with a large number of candidate genes). Here is a short description of how the frequentist way of correcting for population stratification works. It works by using markers that are not linked with the trait in question to correct for any inflation of the statistic caused by population stratification. The method was first developed for binary traits but has since been generalized for quantitative ones .[7] For the binary one, which applies to finding genetic differences between the case and control populations, Devlin and Roeder (1999) use Armitage's trend test
and the test for allelic frequencies
Alleles | aa | Aa | AA | total |
---|---|---|---|---|
Case | r0 | r1 | r2 | R |
Control | s0 | s1 | s2 | S |
total | n0 | n1 | n2 | N |
If the population is in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium the two statistics are approximately equal. Under the null hypothesis of no population stratification the trend test is asymptotic distribution with one degree of freedom. The idea is that the statistic is inflated by a factor so that where depends on the effect of stratification. The above method rests upon the assumption that the inflation factor is constant, which means that the loci should have roughly equal mutation rates, should not be under different selection in the two populations, and the amount of Hardy-Weinberg disequilibrium measured in Wright’s coefficient of inbreeding F should not differ between the different loci. The latter being of greatest concern. If the effect of the stratification is similar across the different loci can be estimated from the unlinked markers where L is the number of unlinked markers. The denominator is derived from the gamma distribution as a robust estimator of . Other estimators have been suggested, for example,[8] suggested using the mean of the statistics instead. This is not the only way to estimate but according to[9] it is an appropriate estimate even if some of the unlinked markers are actually in disequilibrium with a disease causing locus or are themselves associated with the disease. Under the null hypothesis and when correcting for stratification using L unlinked genes, is approximately distributed. With this correction the overall type I error rate should be approximately equal to even when the population is stratified. Devlin and Roeder (1999)[10] mostly considered the situation where gives a 95% confidence level and not smaller p-values. Marchini et al. (2004)[11] demonstrates by simulation that genomic control can lead to an anti-conservative p-value if this value is very small and the two populations (case and control) are extremely distinct. This was especially a problem if the number of unlinked markers were in the order 50 − 100. This can result in false positives (at that significance level).
Notes and references
43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.
support.borinquenhealth.org - http://support.borinquenhealth.org/entries/35126754-Hostgator-Exchange. Hostgator is a huge privately possessed hosting company operating from numerous state of the art facilities in Dallas, Texas. Hostgator was started in 2002, since then they have actually grown rapidly and presently host over 400,000 sites.
Hostgator offers many various web hosting plans, and cater to a broad variety of consumers. From the first time web designer who requires simple, stress free hosting for their personal website; all the means through to huge companies, who require specialist dedicated hosting services.
Hostgator's hosting packages can be split into 3 teams; conventional shared hosting strategies (suitable for the huge bulk people), reseller hosting strategies (these are mainly for people and companies that want to "resell" their account resources to consumers of their own), and lastly devoted server strategies (these accounts give customer their own server, so they do not have to share its resources with anybody else). Very few of us will every require a specialized server so this evaluation will focus on the shared hosting plans that Hostgator offer.
Features
Hostgator's three main shared hosting strategies are named: "Hatchling" (the entry level strategy priced at $6.95 / month), "Baby" (this is the most popular plan, and it is likely to satisfy the requirements of a really broad range of customers), and "Swamp" (much the same as the "Infant" plan, but with boosts in bandwidth and disk space, priced at $14.95 / month).
For a complete list of functions and a side by side comparison of all hosting plans you ought to visit Hostgator's site below. Below is a review of the most essential functions of the "Infant" strategy, this is most likely the most suitable bundle for a lot of users, and it is our favored plan.
Disk area 100GB - This quantity has been just recently upgraded by Hostgator from 5GB to a huge 100GB. All users are likely to find it difficult to exhaust this amount of disk space.
Bandwidth 1000GB/month - Also enhanced is the bandwidth allotment, from 75GB to a seemingly extreme 1000GB. Again virtually absolutely no possibility of utilizing all that, but it's good to know that you certainly will not be facing extra costs for reviewing your limitation, even if you have a really busy website(s).
Website Studio website home builder - This is a wonderful free of cost program that allows you to build your site from scratch. You have over 500 design templates and color schemes to pick from. You require no HTML experience, or code writing understanding. It offers the simplest possible means of creating a professional looking site in a really brief space of time. However, there is no should take my word for it, as Hostgator offers us with a trial version of the software on their internet site!
Unrestricted add-on domains - This actually is the stand out function of this hosting strategy (the "Hatchling" plan just permits 1 domain), and enables you to host as many internet sites as you like on a single account, at no extra cost. This permits you to make complete use of your huge bandwidth and disk space allowances, and host numerous websites at a fraction of the regular expense.
99.9 % Uptime guarantee - This basically informs us that Hostgator is a serious host offering a trustworthy service. If uptime drops below this figure in any offered month then you don't spend for that months hosting, it's as simple as that! We would never ever consider using a host that did not provide a strong uptime assurance; this is simply because there is only one excellent reason why a host will not offer an uptime assurance - unreliable uptime!
30 Day refund guarantee - This has become a pretty conventional attribute in the hosting area, though it's nice to have for included assurance.
Instantaneous setup - Many hosting providers take 24-48 hours to setup your account but Hostgator guarantees to have you up and running in under 15 minutes (they do not charge a setup charge either)!
Unrestricted MySQL data sources - This is really useful since each Fantastico (see below) script needs its own MySQL data source.
Fantastico DeLuxe - This remarkable program enables you to instantaneously set up over 50 scripts via your control panel. Scripts consist of blogs, online forums, galleries, shopping carts, and more.
Endless e-mail accounts - Allows you to have as many, or as couple of, different e-mail addresses as you such as.
cPanel control panel - At the heart of any web hosting experience is the control panel, thankfully Hostgator makes use of among the best systems around, a cPanel. It's well laid out and easy to run. It contains numerous functions and offers great performance. Most importantly, there is a complete working demo on the Hostgator website, so you can check it out yourself!
Customer care and technical support
Hostgator gives us 24/7 phone support, and live online talk. The truth that you are provided two choices to receive instantaneous technical support at any time of the day is great. Our experience has actually constantly been very excellent when contacting Hostgator, their operatives are very respectful and most importantly they seem to know their stuff when dealing with technical concerns.
Efficiency
The performance from Hostgator's servers is outstanding! Hostgator place much tighter limits on the variety of websites sharing the exact same server compared to most various other shared hosting suppliers. This gives higher reliability due to the fact that less strain is put on the servers; and it also greatly improves the speed at which your websites run.
Server efficiency is an additional among the essential locations where Hostgator distinguish themselves from the crowd of various other webhosting.
Our judgment
Overall there is a lot to such as about the method Hostgator does business, they actually do appear to have a great grasp on what the typical consumer needs from an internet hosting carrier. Hardly ever do you discover reports of unhappy Hostgator customers, and after hosting with them ourselves we now know why! Dependability, performance, and uptime from the servers is first rate, also client service is means ahead of many other webhosting out there. Nevertheless, the location where Hostgator really excels is value for money. At just $9.95 / month for the "Infant" strategy (which consists of limitless domains); anybody looking to host even more than one internet site has a rather simple decision to make. The other fantastic aspect of this bundle is that you do not need to sign up to an agreement. You pay on a month-by-month basis, which leaves you free to cancel your account at any time without losing money. To sum up, we don't really have any bad things about Hostgator; at the rates they charge, we genuinely feel that they offer a phenomenal service. Sustain the great Hostgator!
Template:Genetics-footer
- ↑ Pritchard, J.K. and Rosenberg, N.A. (1999). Use of unlinked genetic markers to detect population stratification in association studies. American Journal of Human Genetics 65:220-228.
- ↑ Devlin, B. and Roeder, K. (1999). Genomic control for association studies, Biometrics 55(4): 997–1004.
- ↑ Pritchard, JK, Stephens, M, Rosenberg NA, and Donnelly P. (2000) Association mapping in structured populations. American Journal of Human Genetics 67: 170-181
- ↑ Price AL, Patterson NJ, Plenge RM, Weinblatt ME, Shadick NA, Reich D. (2006) Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association. Nature Genetics 38:904-909
- ↑ Lander, E. S. and Schork, N. J. (1994). Genetic dissection of complex traits, Science 265(5181): 2037–2048.
- ↑ Devlin, B. and Roeder, K. (1999). Genomic control for association studies, Biometrics 55(4): 997–1004.
- ↑ Bacanu, S.-A., Devlin, B. and Roeder, K. (2002). Association studies for quantitative traits in structured populations, Genet Epidemiol 22(1): 78–93.
- ↑ Reich, D. E. and Goldstein, D. B. (2001). Detecting association in a case-control study while correcting for population stratification, Genet Epidemiol 20(1): 4–16.
- ↑ Bacanu, S. A., Devlin, B. and Roeder, K. (2000). The power of genomic control, Am J Hum Genet 66(6): 1933–1944.
- ↑ Devlin, B. and Roeder, K. (1999). Genomic control for association studies, Biometrics 55(4): 997–1004.
- ↑ Marchini, J., Cardon, L. R., Phillips, M. S. and Donnelly, P. (2004). The effects of human population structure on large genetic association studies, Nat Genet 36(5): 512–517.