# Generalized Riemann hypothesis

The Riemann hypothesis is one of the most important conjectures in mathematics. It is a statement about the zeros of the Riemann zeta function. Various geometrical and arithmetical objects can be described by so-called **global L-functions**, which are formally similar to the Riemann zeta-function. One can then ask the same question about the zeros of these *L*-functions, yielding various generalizations of the Riemann hypothesis. Many mathematicians believe these **generalizations of the Riemann hypothesis** to be true. The only cases of these conjectures which have been proven occur in the function field case (not the number field case).

Global *L*-functions can be associated to elliptic curves, number fields (in which case they are called **Dedekind zeta-functions**), Maass forms, and Dirichlet characters (in which case they are called Dirichlet L-functions). When the Riemann hypothesis is formulated for Dedekind zeta-functions, it is known as the **extended Riemann hypothesis** (ERH) and when it is formulated for Dirichlet *L*-functions, it is known as the **generalized Riemann hypothesis** (GRH). These two statements will be discussed in more detail below. (Many mathematicians use the label *generalized Riemann hypothesis* to cover the extension of the Riemann hypothesis to all global *L*-functions,
not just the special case of Dirichlet *L*-functions.)

## Generalized Riemann hypothesis (GRH)

The generalized Riemann hypothesis (for Dirichlet *L*-functions) was probably formulated for the first time by Adolf Piltz in 1884.^{[1]} Like the original Riemann hypothesis, it has far reaching consequences about the distribution of prime numbers.

The formal statement of the hypothesis follows. A Dirichlet character is a completely multiplicative arithmetic function χ such that there exists a positive integer *k* with χ(*n* + *k*) = χ(*n*) for all *n* and χ(*n*) = 0 whenever gcd(*n*, *k*) > 1. If such a character is given, we define the corresponding **Dirichlet L-function** by

for every complex number *s* with real part > 1. By analytic continuation, this function can be extended to a meromorphic function defined on the whole complex plane. The generalized Riemann hypothesis asserts that for every Dirichlet character χ and every complex number *s* with L(χ,*s*) = 0: if the real part of *s* is between 0 and 1, then it is actually 1/2.

The case χ(*n*) = 1 for all *n* yields the ordinary Riemann hypothesis.

### Consequences of GRH

Dirichlet's theorem states that if *a* and *d* are coprime natural numbers, then the arithmetic progression *a*, *a*+*d*, *a*+2*d*, *a*+3*d*, … contains infinitely many prime numbers. Let π(*x*,*a*,*d*) denote the number of prime numbers in this progression which are less than or equal to *x*. If the generalized Riemann hypothesis is true, then for every coprime *a* and *d* and for every ε > 0

where φ(*d*) is Euler's totient function and is the Big O notation. This is a considerable strengthening of the prime number theorem.

If GRH is true, then every proper subgroup of the multiplicative group omits a number less than 2(ln *n*)^{2}, as well as a number coprime to *n* less than 3(ln *n*)^{2}.^{[2]} In other words, is generated by a set of numbers less than 2(ln *n*)^{2}. This is often used in proofs, and it has many consequences, for example (assuming GRH):

- The Miller–Rabin primality test is guaranteed to run in polynomial time. (A polynomial-time primality test which does not require GRH, the AKS primality test, was published in 2002.)
- The Shanks–Tonelli algorithm is guaranteed to run in polynomial time.

If GRH is true, then for every prime *p* there exists a primitive root mod *p* (a generator of the multiplicative group of integers modulo *p*) which is less than ^{[3]}

Goldbach's weak conjecture also follows from the generalized Riemann hypothesis. The yet to be verified proof of Harald Helfgott of this conjecture verifies the GRH for several thousand small characters up to a certain imaginary part to obtain sufficient bounds that prove the conjecture for all integers above 10^{29}, integers below which have already been verified by brute force.^{[4]}

Assuming the truth of the GRH, the estimate of the character sum in the Pólya–Vinogradov inequality can be improved to , *q* being the modulus of the character.

## Extended Riemann hypothesis (ERH)

Suppose *K* is a number field (a finite-dimensional field extension of the rationals **Q**) with ring of integers O_{K} (this ring is the integral closure of the integers **Z** in *K*). If *a* is an ideal of O_{K}, other than the zero ideal we denote its norm by *Na*. The **Dedekind zeta-function** of *K* is then defined by

for every complex number *s* with real part > 1. The sum extends over all non-zero ideals *a* of O_{K}.

The Dedekind zeta-function satisfies a functional equation and can be extended by analytic continuation to the whole complex plane. The resulting function encodes important information about the number field *K*. The extended Riemann hypothesis asserts that for every number field *K* and every complex number *s* with ζ_{K}(*s*) = 0: if the real part of *s* is between 0 and 1, then it is in fact 1/2.

The ordinary Riemann hypothesis follows from the extended one if one takes the number field to be **Q**, with ring of integers **Z**.

The ERH implies an effective version of the Chebotarev density theorem: if *L*/*K* is a finite Galois extension with Galois group *G*, and *C* a union of conjugacy classes of *G*, the number of unramified primes of *K* of norm below *x* with Frobenius conjugacy class in *C* is

where the constant implied in the big-O notation is absolute, *n* is the degree of *L* over **Q**, and Δ its discriminant.

## See also

## Notes

- ↑ Davenport, p. 124.
- ↑ {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=journal }}
- ↑ {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=journal }}
- ↑ p5. Template:Cite web

## References

- Davenport, Harold.
*Multiplicative number theory*. Third edition. Revised and with a preface by Hugh L. Montgomery. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 74. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000. xiv+177 pp. ISBN 0-387-95097-4.

## Further reading

- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=citation }}