# Grothendieck group

In mathematics, the Grothendieck group construction in abstract algebra constructs an abelian group from a commutative monoid in the most universal way. It takes its name from the more general construction in category theory, introduced by Alexander Grothendieck in his fundamental work of the mid-1950s that resulted in the development of K-theory, which led to his proof of the Grothendieck-Riemann-Roch theorem. This article treats both constructions.

## Grothendieck group of a commutative monoid

Given a commutative monoid M, we want to construct "the most general" abelian group K that arises from M by introducing additive inverses. Such an abelian group K always exists; it is called the Grothendieck group of M. It is characterized by a certain universal property and can also be concretely constructed from M.

### Universal property

Let M be a commutative monoid. Its Grothendieck group K is an abelian group with the following universal property: There exists a monoid homomorphism

$i\colon M\rightarrow K$ such that for any monoid homomorphism

$f\colon M\rightarrow A$ from the commutative monoid M to an abelian group A, there is a unique group homomorphism

$g\colon K\rightarrow A$ such that

$f=g\circ i.$ This expresses the fact that any abelian group A that contains a homomorphic image of M will also contain a homomorphic image of K, K being the "most general" abelian group containing a homomorphic image of M.

### Explicit constructions

To construct the Grothendieck group of a commutative monoid M, one forms the Cartesian product

M×M.

(The two coordinates are meant to represent a positive part and a negative part: (m1, m2) is meant to correspond to the element m1m2 in K.)

Addition on MxM is defined coordinate-wise:

(m1, m2) + (n1, n2) = (m1 + n1, m2 + n2).

Next we define an equivalence relation on M×M. We say that (m1, m2) is equivalent to (n1, n2) if, for some element k of M, m1 + n2 + k = m2 + n1 + k (the element k is necessary because the cancellation law does not hold in all monoids). The equivalence class of the element (m1, m2) is denoted by [(m1, m2)]. We define K to be the set of equivalence classes. Since the addition operation on M×M is compatible with our equivalence relation, we obtain an addition on K, and K becomes an abelian group. The identity element of K is [(0, 0)], and the inverse of [(m1, m2)] is [(m2, m1)]. The homomorphism i : MK sends the element m to [(m, 0)].

Alternatively, the Grothendieck group K of M can also be constructed using generators and relations: denoting by (Z(M),+') the free abelian group generated by the set M, the Grothendieck group K is the quotient of Z(M) by the subgroup generated by $\{(x+'y)-'(x+y)\mid x,y\in M\}$ . (Here +' and -' denote the addition and subtraction in the free abelian group Z(M) while + denotes the addition in the monoid M.) This construction has the advantage that it can be performed for any semigroup M and yields a group which satisfies the corresponding universal properties for semigroups, i.e. the "most general and smallest group containing a homomorphic image of M". This is known as the "group completion of a semigroup" or "group of fractions of a semigroup".

### Properties

In the language of category theory, any universal construction gives rise to a functor; we thus obtain a functor from the category of commutative monoids to the category of abelian groups which sends the commutative monoid M to its Grothendieck group K. This functor is left adjoint to the forgetful functor from the category of abelian groups to the category of commutative monoids.

For a commutative monoid M, the map i : MK is injective if and only if M has the cancellation property, and it is bijective if and only if M is already a group.

### Examples: the integers, the Grothendieck group of a manifold and of a ring

The easiest example of a Grothendieck group is the construction of the integers Z from the natural numbers N. First one observes that the natural numbers (including 0) together with the usual addition indeed form a commutative monoid (N,+). Now when we use the Grothendieck group construction we obtain the formal differences between natural numbers as elements n - m and we have the equivalence relation

$n-m\sim n'-m'\Leftrightarrow n+m'=n'+m$ .

Now define

$n:=[n-0]$ ,
$-n:=[0-n]$ for all nN. This defines the integers Z. Indeed this is the usual construction to obtain the integers from the natural numbers. See "Construction" under Integers for a more detailed explanation.

The Grothendieck group is the fundamental construction of K-theory. The group K0(M) of a compact manifold M is defined to be the Grothendieck group of the commutative monoid of all isomorphism classes of vector bundles of finite rank on M with the monoid operation given by direct sum. This gives a contravariant functor from manifolds to abelian groups. This functor is studied and extended in topological K-theory.

The zeroth algebraic K group K0(R) of a (not necessarily commutative) ring R is the Grothendieck group of the monoid consisting of isomorphism classes of finitely generated projective modules over R, with the monoid operation given by the direct sum. Then K0 is a covariant functor from rings to abelian groups.

The two previous examples are related: consider the case where R is the ring $C^{\infty }(M)$ of (say complex-valued) smooth functions on a compact manifold M. In this case the projective R-modules are dual to vector bundles over M (by the Serre-Swan theorem). Thus K0(R) and K0(M) are the same group.

## Grothendieck group and extensions

Another construction that carries the name Grothendieck group is the following: Let R be a finite-dimensional algebra over some field k or more generally an artinian ring. Then define the Grothendieck group G0(R) as the abelian group generated by the set $\{[X]|X\in R\mathrm {-Mod} \}$ of isomorphism classes of finitely generated R-modules and the following relations: For every short exact sequence

$0\to A\to B\to C\to 0$ $[A]-[B]+[C]=0$ The abelian group defined by these generators and these relations is the Grothendieck group G0(R).

This group satisfies a universal property. We make a preliminary definition: A function χ from the set of isomorphism classes to an abelian group A is called additive if, for each exact sequence 0 → ABC → 0, we have $\chi (A)-\chi (B)+\chi (C)=0$ . Then, for any additive function χ: R-modX, there is a unique group homomorphism f: G0(R)X such that χ factors through f and the map that takes each object of ${\mathcal {A}}$ to the element representing its isomorphism class in G0(R). Concretely this means that f satisfies the equation f([V]) = χ(V) for every finitely generated R-module V and f is the only group homomorphism that does that.

Examples of additive functions are the character function from representation theory: If R is a finite-dimensional k-algebra, then we can associate the character χV: Rk to every finite-dimensional R-module V: χV(x) is defined to be the trace of the k-linear map that is given by multiplication with the element xR on V.

By choosing a suitable basis and writing the corresponding matrices in block triangular form one easily sees that character functions are additive in the above sense. By the universal property this gives us a "universal character" $\chi :G_{0}(R)\to \mathrm {Hom} _{K}(R,K)$ such that χ([V]) = χV.

If k = C and R is the group ring C[G] of a finite group G then this character map even gives a natural isomorphism of G0(C[G]) and the character ring Ch(G). In the modular representation theory of finite groups k can be a field ${\overline {\mathbf {F} }}_{p}$ , the algebraic closure of the finite field with p elements. In this case the analogously defined map that associates to each k[G]-module its Brauer character is also a natural isomorphism $G_{0}({\overline {\mathbf {F} }}_{p}[G])\to \mathrm {BCh} (G)$ onto the ring of Brauer characters. In this way Grothendieck groups show up in representation theory.

This universal property also makes G0(R) the 'universal receiver' of generalized Euler characteristics. In particular, for every bounded complex of objects in R-mod

$\cdots \to 0\to 0\to A^{n}\to A^{n+1}\to \cdots \to A^{m-1}\to A^{m}\to 0\to 0\to \cdots$ we have a canonical element

$[A^{\ast }]=\sum _{i}(-1)^{i}[A^{i}]=\sum _{i}(-1)^{i}[H^{i}(A^{\ast })]\in G_{0}(R).$ In fact the Grothendieck group was originally introduced for the study of Euler characteristics.

## Grothendieck groups of exact categories

A common generalization of these two concepts is given by the Grothendieck group of an exact category ${\mathcal {A}}$ . Simplified an exact category is an additive category together with a class of distinguished short sequences ABC. The distinguished sequences are called "exact sequences", hence the name. The precise axioms for this distinguished class do not matter for the construction of the Grothendieck group.

The Grothendieck group is defined in the same way as before as the abelian group with one generator [M] for each (isomorphism class of) object(s) of the category ${\mathcal {A}}$ and one relation

$[A]-[B]+[C]=0$ for each exact sequence

$A\hookrightarrow B\twoheadrightarrow C$ .

Alternatively one can define the Grothendieck group using a similar universal property: An abelian group G together with a mapping $\phi :\mathrm {Ob} ({\mathcal {A}})\to G$ is called the Grothendieck group of ${\mathcal {A}}$ iff every "additive" map $\chi \colon \mathrm {Ob} ({\mathcal {A}})\to X$ from ${\mathcal {A}}$ into an abelian group X ("additive" in the above sense, i.e. for every exact sequence $A\hookrightarrow B\twoheadrightarrow C$ we have $\chi (A)-\chi (B)+\chi (C)=0$ ) factors uniquely through φ.

Every abelian category is an exact category if we just use the standard interpretation of "exact". This gives the notion of a Grothendieck group in the previous section if we choose ${\mathcal {A}}:=R$ -mod the category of finitely generated R-modules as ${\mathcal {A}}$ . This is really abelian because R was assumed to be artinian and (hence noetherian) in the previous section.

On the other hand every additive category is also exact if we declare those and only those sequences to be exact that have the form $A\hookrightarrow A\oplus B\twoheadrightarrow B$ with the canonical inclusion and projection morphisms. This procedure produces the Grothendieck group of the commutative monoid $(\mathrm {Iso} ({\mathcal {A}}),\oplus )$ in the first sense (here $\mathrm {Iso} ({\mathcal {A}})$ means the "set" [ignoring all foundational issues] of isomorphism classes in ${\mathcal {A}}$ .)

## Grothendieck groups of triangulated categories

Generalizing even further it is also possible to define the Grothendieck group for triangulated categories. The construction is essentially similar but uses the relations [X] - [Y] + [Z] = 0 whenever there is a distinguished triangle XYZX.

## Further examples

$0\to k^{l}\to k^{m}\to k^{n}\to 0$ m = l + n, so
$[k^{l+n}]=[k^{l}]+[k^{n}]=(l+n)[k].$ Thus $[V]=\operatorname {dim} (V)[k]$ , the Grothendieck group $K_{0}(\mathrm {Vect} _{\mathrm {fin} })$ is isomorphic to Z and is generated by [k]. Finally for a bounded complex of finite-dimensional vector spaces V*,
$[V^{*}]=\chi (V^{*})[k]$ where $\chi$ is the standard Euler characteristic defined by
$\chi (V^{*})=\sum _{i}(-1)^{i}\operatorname {dim} V=\sum _{i}(-1)^{i}\operatorname {dim} H^{i}(V^{*}).$ • In the case where R is a finite-dimensional algebra over some field, the Grothendieck groups G0(R) (defined via short exact sequences of finitely generated modules) and K0(R) (defined via direct sum of finitely generated projective modules) coincide. In fact, both groups are isomorphic to the free abelian group generated by the isomorphism classes of simple R-modules.
• There is another Grothendieck group G0 of a ring or a ringed space which is sometimes useful. The category in the case is chosen to be the category of all quasi-coherent sheaves on the ringed space which reduces to the category of all modules over some ring R in case of affine schemes. G0 is not a functor, but nevertheless it carries important information.
• Since the (bounded) derived category is triangulated, there is a Grothendieck group for derived categories too. This has applications in representation theory for example. For the unbounded category the Grothendieck group however vanishes. For a derived category of some complex finite-dimensional positively graded algebra there is a subcategory in the unbounded derived category containing the abelian category A of finite-dimensional graded modules whose Grothendieck group is the q-adic completion of the Grothendieck group of A.