Incomplete Cholesky factorization

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search

In mathematics, Doob's martingale inequality is a result in the study of stochastic processes. It gives a bound on the probability that a stochastic process exceeds any given value over a given interval of time. As the name suggests, the result is usually given in the case that the process is a non-negative martingale, but the result is also valid for non-negative submartingales.

The inequality is due to the American mathematician Joseph L. Doob.

Statement of the inequality

Let X be a submartingale taking non-negative real values, either in discrete or continuous time. That is, for all times s and t with s < t,

𝐄[Xt|ℱs]≥Xs.

(For a continuous-time submartingale, assume further that the process is càdlàg.) Then, for any constant C > 0 and p ≥ 1,

𝐏[sup0≤t≤TXt≥C]≤𝐄[XTp]Cp.

In the above, as is conventional, P denotes the probability measure on the sample space Ω of the stochastic process

X:[0,T]×Ω→[0,+∞)

and E denotes the expected value with respect to the probability measure P, i.e. the integral

𝐄[XT]=∫ΩXT(ω)d𝐏(ω)

in the sense of Lebesgue integration. ℱs denotes the σ-algebra generated by all the random variables Xi with i ≤ s; the collection of such σ-algebras forms a filtration of the probability space.

Further inequalities

There are further (sub)martingale inequalities also due to Doob. With the same assumptions on X as above, let

St=sup0≤s≤tXs,

and for p ≥ 1 let

‖Xt‖p=‖Xt‖Lp(Ω,ℱ,𝐏)=(𝐄[|Xt|p])1p.

In this notation, Doob's inequality as stated above reads

𝐏[ST≥C]≤‖XT‖ppCp.

The following inequalities also hold: for p = 1,

‖ST‖p≤ee−1(1+‖XTlog⁡XT‖p)

and, for p > 1,

‖XT‖p≤‖ST‖p≤pp−1‖XT‖p.

Doob's inequality for discrete-time martingales implies Kolmogorov's inequality: if X1, X2, ... is a sequence of real-valued independent random variables, each with mean zero, it is clear that

𝐄[X1+…+Xn+Xn+1|X1,…,Xn]=X1+…+Xn+𝐄[Xn+1|X1,…,Xn]=X1+⋯+Xn,

so Mn = X1 + ... + Xn is a martingale. Note that Jensen's inequality implies that |Mn| is a nonnegative submartingale if Mn is a martingale. Hence, taking p = 2 in Doob's martingale inequality,

𝐏[max1≤i≤n|Mi|≥λ]≤𝐄[Mn2]λ2,

which is precisely the statement of Kolmogorov's inequality.

Application: Brownian motion

Let B denote canonical one-dimensional Brownian motion. Then

𝐏[sup0≤t≤TBt≥C]≤exp⁡(−C22T).

The proof is just as follows: since the exponential function is monotonically increasing, for any non-negative λ,

{sup0≤t≤TBt≥C}={sup0≤t≤Texp⁡(λBt)≥exp⁡(λC)}.

By Doob's inequality, and since the exponential of Brownian motion is a positive submartingale,

𝐏[sup0≤t≤TBt≥C]=𝐏[sup0≤t≤Texp⁡(λBt)≥exp⁡(λC)]≤𝐄[exp⁡(λBT)]exp⁡(λC)=exp⁡(12λ2T−λC)𝐄[exp⁡(λBt)]=exp⁡(12λ2t)

Since the left-hand side does not depend on λ, choose λ to minimize the right-hand side: λ = C/T gives the desired inequality.

References

  • 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534 (Theorem II.1.7)
  • Other Sports Official Kull from Drumheller, has hobbies such as telescopes, property developers in singapore and crocheting. Identified some interesting places having spent 4 months at Saloum Delta.

    my web-site http://himerka.com/

Template:Stochastic processes