# Operad theory

**Operad theory** is a field of abstract algebra concerned with prototypical algebras that model properties such as commutativity or anticommutativity as well as various amounts of associativity. Operads generalize the various associativity properties already observed in algebras and coalgebras such as Lie algebras or Poisson algebras by modeling computational trees within the algebra. Algebras are to operads as group representations are to groups. Originating from work in algebraic topology by Boardman and Vogt, and J. Peter May (to whom their name is due), it has more recently found many applications, drawing for example on work by Maxim Kontsevich on graph homology.

An operad can be seen as a set of operations, each one having a fixed finite number of inputs (arguments) and one output, which can be composed one with others; it is a category-theoretic analog of universal algebra.

The word "operad" was also created by May as a portmanteau of "operations" and "monad" (and also because his mother was an opera singer). Regarding its creation, he wrote: "The name 'operad' is a word that I coined myself, spending a week thinking of nothing else." ^{[1]}

## Definition

### Operad without permutations

An **operad without permutations** (sometimes called a **non-symmetric**, **non-** or **plain** operad) consists of the following:

- a sequence of sets, whose elements are called
*-ary operations*, - an element in called the
*identity*, - for all positive integers ,

a *composition* function

satisfying the following coherence axioms:

(the number of arguments corresponds to the arities of the operations).

Alternatively, a plain operad is a multicategory with one object.

### Operad

An **operad** is a sequence of sets ,
with a right action * of the symmetric group on ,
an identity element in and compositions maps
satisfying the above associative and identity axioms, as well as

The permutation actions in this definition are vital to most applications, including the original application to loop spaces.

A **morphism of operads** consists of a sequence

which:

### Associativity axiom

"Associativity" means that *composition* of operations is associative
(the function is associative), analogous to the axiom in category theory that ; it does *not* mean that the operations *themselves* are associative as operations.
Compare with the associative operad, below.

Associativity in operad theory means that one can write expressions involving operations without ambiguity from the omitted compositions, just as associativity for operations allows one to write products without ambiguity from the omitted parentheses.

For instance, suppose that is a binary operation, which is written as or . Note that may or may not be associative.

Then what is commonly written is unambiguously written operadically as . This sends to (apply on the first two, and the identity on the third), and then the on the left "multiplies" by . This is clearer when depicted as a tree:

which yields a 3-ary operation:

However, the expression is *a priori* ambiguous:
it could mean , if the inner compositions are performed first, or it could mean ,
if the outer compositions are performed first (operations are read from right to left).
Writing , this is versus . That is, the tree is missing "vertical parentheses":

If the top two rows of operations are composed first (puts an upward parenthesis at the line; does the inner composition first), the following results:

which then evaluates unambiguously to yield a 4-ary operation. As an annotated expression:

If the bottom two rows of operations are composed first (puts a downward parenthesis at the line; does the outer composition first), following results:

which then evaluates unambiguously to yield a 4-ary operation:

The operad axiom of associativity is that *these yield the same result,* and thus that the expression is unambiguous.

### Identity axiom

The identity axiom (for a binary operation) can be visualized in a tree as:

meaning that the three operations obtained are equal: pre- or post- composing with the identity makes no difference.

Note that, as for categories, is a corollary of the identity axiom.

## Examples

### "Little something" operads

A **little discs operad** or, **little balls operad** or, more specifically, the **little n-discs operad** is a topological operad defined in terms of configurations of disjoint

*n*-dimensional discs inside a unit

*n*-disc centered in the origin of

**R**

^{n}. The operadic composition for little 2-discs is illustrated in the figure.

^{[2]}

Originally the **little n-cubes operad** or the

**little intervals operad**(initially called little

*n*-cubes PROPs) was defined by Michael Boardman and Rainer Vogt in a similar way, in terms of configurations of disjoint axis-aligned

*n*-dimensional hypercubes (n-dimensional intervals) inside the unit hypercube.

^{[3]}Later it was generalized by May

^{[4]}to

**little convex bodies operad**, and "little discs" is a case of "folklore" derived from the "little convex bodies".

^{[5]}

### Associative operad

Another class of examples of operads are those capturing the structures of algebraic structures, such as associative algebras, commutative algebras and Lie algebras. Each of these can be exhibited as a finitely presented operad, in each of these three generated by binary operations.

Thus, the associative operad is generated by a binary operation , subject to the condition that

This condition *does* correspond to associativity of the binary operation ; writing multiplicatively, the above condition is . This associativity of the *operation* should not be confused with associativity of *composition*; see the axiom of associativity, above.

This operad is terminal in the category of non-symmetric operads, as it has exactly one *n*-ary operation for each *n,* corresponding to the unambiguous product of *n* terms: . For this reason, it is sometimes written as 1 by category theorists (by analogy with the one-point set, which is terminal in the category of sets).

### Terminal symmetric operad

The terminal symmetric operad is the operad whose algebras are commutative monoids, which also has one *n*-ary operation for each *n*, with each acting trivially; this triviality corresponds to commutativity, and whose *n*-ary operation is the unambiguous product of *n*-terms, where order does not matter:

### Operads in topology

In many examples the are not just sets but rather topological spaces. Some names of important
examples are the *little n-disks*, *little n-cubes*, and *linear isometries* operads. The idea behind the
little *n*-disks operad comes from homotopy theory, and the idea is that an element of
is an arrangement of *n* disks within the unit disk. Now, the identity is the unit disk as a subdisk of itself, and composition of arrangements is by scaling the unit disk down into the disk that corresponds to the slot in the composition, and inserting the scaled contents there.

### Operads from the symmetric and braid groups

There is an operad for which each is given by the symmetric group . The composite permutes its inputs in blocks according to , and within blocks according to the appropriate . Similarly, there is an operad for which each is given by the Artin braid group .

### Linear algebra

In linear algebra, one can consider vector spaces to be algebras over the operad (the infinite direct sum, so only finitely many terms are non-zero; this corresponds to only taking finite sums), which parametrizes linear combinations: the vector for instance corresponds to the linear combination

Similarly, one can consider affine combinations, conical combinations, and convex combinations to correspond to the sub-operads where the terms sum to 1, the terms are all non-negative, or both, respectively. Graphically, these are the infinite affine hyperplane, the infinite hyper-octant, and the infinite simplex. This formalizes what is meant by being or the standard simplex being model spaces, and such observations as that every bounded convex polytope is the image of a simplex. Here suboperads correspond to more restricted operations and thus more general theories.

This point of view formalizes the notion that linear combinations are the most general sort of operation on a vector space – saying that a vector space is an algebra over the operad of linear combinations is precisely the statement that *all possible* algebraic operations in a vector space are linear combinations. The basic operations of vector addition and scalar multiplication are a generating set for the operad of all linear combinations, while the linear combinations operad canonically encode all possible operations on a vector space.

## See also

## Notes

- ↑ http://www.math.uchicago.edu/~may/PAPERS/mayi.pdf Page 2
- ↑ Giovanni Giachetta, Luigi Mangiarotti, Gennadi Sardanashvily (2005)
*Geometric and Algebraic Topological Methods in Quantum Mechanics,*ISBN 981-256-129-3, pp. 474,475 - ↑
*Axiomatic, Enriched and Motivic Homotopy Theory*by J. P. C. Greenlees (2004) ISBN 1-4020-1834-7, pp. 154–156 - ↑ J. P. May, "Infinite loop space theory",
*Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.*83 (1977), 456–494. - ↑ Jim Stasheff, "Grafting Boardman's Cherry Trees to Quantum Field Theory", 31 March 1998, Template:Arxiv

## References

- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=book }}

- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=book }}

- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=book }}

- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=book }}

- Template:Cite arxiv
- {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=journal }}

- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=citation }}

- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation

|CitationClass=citation }}

{{ safesubst:#invoke:Unsubst||$N=Use dmy dates |date=__DATE__ |$B= }}