# Poynting vector Dipole radiation of a dipole vertically in the page showing electric field strength (colour) and Poynting vector (arrows) in the plane of the page.

{{#invoke: Sidebar | collapsible }} In physics, the Poynting vector represents the directional energy flux density (the rate of energy transfer per unit area, in units of watts per square metre (W·m−2)) of an electromagnetic field. It is named after its inventor John Henry Poynting. Oliver Heaviside and Nikolay Umov independently co-invented the Poynting vector.Template:Cn

## Definition

In Poynting's original paper and in many textbooks, it is usually denoted by S or N, and defined as:

$\mathbf {S} =\mathbf {E} \times \mathbf {H} ,$ which is often called the Abraham form; where E is the electric field and H the magnetic field. (All bold letters represent vectors.)

Occasionally an alternative definition in terms of electric field E and the magnetic flux density B is used. It is even possible to combine the displacement field D with the magnetic flux density B to get the Minkowski form of the Poynting vector, or use D and H to construct another. The choice has been controversial: Pfeifer et al. summarize and to a certain extent resolve the century-long dispute between proponents of the Abraham and Minkowski forms.

The Poynting vector represents the particular case of an energy flux vector for electromagnetic energy. However, any type of energy has its direction of movement in space, as well as its density, so energy flux vectors can be defined for other types of energy as well, e.g., for mechanical energy. The Umov–Poynting vector discovered by Nikolay Umov in 1874 describes energy flux in liquid and elastic media in a completely generalized view.

### Interpretation

The Poynting vector appears in Poynting's theorem (see this article for the derivation of the theorem and vector), an energy-conservation law,

${\frac {\partial u}{\partial t}}=-\mathbf {\nabla } \cdot \mathbf {S} -\mathbf {J} _{f}\cdot \mathbf {E} ,$ where Jf is the current density of free charges and u is the electromagnetic energy density,

$u={\frac {1}{2}}\left(\mathbf {E} \cdot \mathbf {D} +\mathbf {B} \cdot \mathbf {H} \right)$ where E is the electric field, D the electric displacement field, B the magnetic flux density, and H the magnetic field vector.

The first term in the right-hand side represents the net electromagnetic energy flow into a small volume, while the second term represents the subtracted portion of the work done by free electrical currents that are not necessarily converted into electromagnetic energy (dissipation, heat). In this definition, bound electrical currents are not included in this term, and instead contribute to S and u.

Note that u can only be given if linear, nondispersive and uniform materials are involved, i.e., if the constitutive relations can be written as

$\mathbf {D} =\varepsilon \mathbf {E} \,\quad \mathbf {H} =\mathbf {B} /\mu$ where ε and μ are constants (which depend on the material through which the energy flows), called the permittivity and permeability, respectively, of the material.

In principle, this limits Poynting's theorem in this form to fields in vacuum. A generalization to dispersive materials is possible under certain circumstances at the cost of additional terms and the loss of their clear physical interpretation.

The Poynting vector is usually interpreted as an energy flux, but this is only strictly correct for electromagnetic radiation. The more general case is described by Poynting's theorem above, where it occurs as a divergence, which means that it can only describe the change of energy density in space, rather than the flow.

### Invariance to adding a curl of a field

Since the Poynting vector only occurs in Poynting's theorem as a divergence ∇ ⋅ S, the Poynting vector S is arbitrary to the extent that one can add a curl of a field F to S,

${\mathbf {S} }'={\mathbf {S} }+\nabla \times {\mathbf {F} }\,\Rightarrow \,\nabla \cdot {\mathbf {S} }'=\nabla \cdot {\mathbf {S} }\,,$ since the divergence of the curl term is zero: ∇ ⋅ (∇ × F) = 0 for an arbitrary field F (see Vector calculus identities).

This property is used in quasi-electrostatic regimes to describe for instance energy propagating through waves in piezoelectric materials. In such cases magnetic fields are negligible and a local flux of energy can be defined based on electrical quantities only. In the general case we can express the divergence of the Poynting vector as:

$\nabla \cdot \left(\mathbf {E} \times \mathbf {H} \right)=\mathbf {H} \cdot \nabla \times \mathbf {E} -\mathbf {E} \cdot \nabla \times \mathbf {H}$ The fourth of the Maxwell's equations writes:

$\nabla \times \mathbf {H} =\mathbf {J} _{\mathrm {f} }+{\frac {\partial \mathbf {D} }{\partial t}}$ where ${\mathbf {J} }_{\mathrm {f} }$ is the current density due to free charges. In dielectric materials it reduces to: $\nabla \times \mathbf {H} ={\frac {\partial \mathbf {D} }{\partial t}}$ .

Combining the two previous results, leads to the following quasi-electrostatic divergence:

$\nabla \cdot \mathbf {S} =-\mathbf {E} \cdot {\frac {\partial \mathbf {D} }{\partial t}}$ A new "magnetic free" Poynting vector leading to the same divergence can be defined as:

$\mathbf {S} '=-V{\frac {\partial \mathbf {D} }{\partial t}}$ where V is the electrostatic potential.

A demonstration in the case of the parallel-plate capacitor that both S and S′, although being orthogonal, lead to the same overall energy balance is provided by Bondar & Bastien.

It is often thought that using a different vector than the classical Poynting vector will lead to inconsistencies in a relativistic description of electromagnetic fields where energy and momentum should be defined locally in terms of the stress–energy tensor.{{ safesubst:#invoke:Unsubst||date=__DATE__ |$B= {{#invoke:Category handler|main}}{{#invoke:Category handler|main}}[citation needed] }} However such a transformation is consistent with Quantum electrodynamics where photon particles have no defined trajectories but only a probability of being emitted or absorbed.{{ safesubst:#invoke:Unsubst||date=__DATE__ |$B= {{#invoke:Category handler|main}}{{#invoke:Category handler|main}}[citation needed] }}

## Formulation in terms of microscopic fields

In some cases, it may be more appropriate to define the Poynting vector S as

$\mathbf {S} ={\frac {1}{\mu _{0}}}\mathbf {E} \times \mathbf {B} ,$ where μ0 is the magnetic constant. It can be derived directly from Maxwell's equations in terms of total charge and current and the Lorentz force law only.

The corresponding form of Poynting's theorem is

${\frac {\partial u}{\partial t}}+\nabla \cdot {\mathbf {S} }=-{\mathbf {J} }\cdot {\mathbf {E} },$ where J is the total current density and the energy density u is

$u={\frac {1}{2}}\left(\varepsilon _{0}\mathbf {E} ^{2}+{\frac {1}{\mu _{0}}}\mathbf {B} ^{2}\right)$ where ε0 is the electric constant.

The two alternative definitions of the Poynting vector are equivalent in vacuum or in non-magnetic materials, where B = μ0H. In all other cases, they differ in that

$\mathbf {S} =1/\mu _{0}\mathbf {E} \times \mathbf {B} \,,$ and the corresponding u are purely radiative, since the dissipation term, (JE) covers the total current, while the definition in terms of H has contributions from bound currents which then lack in the dissipation term.

Since only the microscopic fields E and B are needed in the derivation of

$\mathbf {S} =1/\mu _{0}\mathbf {E} \times \mathbf {B} \,,$ assumptions about any material possibly present can be completely avoided, and Poynting's vector as well as the theorem in this definition are universally valid, in vacuum as in all kinds of material. This is especially true for the electromagnetic energy density, in contrast to the case above.

## Time-averaged Poynting vector

For time-periodic sinusoidal electromagnetic fields, the average power flow per unit time is often more useful, and can be found by treating the electric and magnetic fields as complex vectors as follows (star * denotes the complex conjugate):

The average over time is given as

$\langle {\mathbf {S} }\rangle ={\frac {1}{T}}\int _{0}^{T}{\mathbf {S} }(t)dt={\frac {1}{T}}\int _{0}^{T}\left[{\frac {1}{2}}{\mathrm {Re} }\left({\mathbf {E_{c}} }\times {\mathbf {H_{c}} }^{*}\right)+{\frac {1}{2}}{\mathrm {Re} }\left({\mathbf {E_{c}} }\times {\mathbf {H_{c}} }e^{2j\omega t}\right)\right]dt.$ The second term is a sinusoidal curve

$\mathrm {Re} \left(e^{2j\omega t}\right)=\cos 2\omega t$ and its average is zero, giving

$\langle \mathbf {S} \rangle ={\frac {1}{2}}\mathrm {Re} \left(\mathbf {E_{c}} \times \mathbf {H_{c}} ^{*}\right)={\frac {1}{2}}\mathrm {Re} \left(\left[\mathbf {E_{c}} e^{j\omega t}\right]\times \left[\mathbf {H_{c}} ^{*}e^{-j\omega t}\right]\right)={\frac {1}{2}}\mathrm {Re} \left(\mathbf {\widetilde {E}} \times \mathbf {\widetilde {H}} ^{*}\right).$ ## Examples and applications

### In a coaxial cable

For example, the Poynting vector within the dielectric insulator of a coaxial cable is nearly parallel to the wire axis (assuming no fields outside the cable and a wavelength longer than the diameter of the cable, including DC). Electrical energy delivered to the load is flowing entirely through the dielectric between the conductors. Very little energy flows in the conductors themselves, since the electric field strength is nearly zero. The energy flowing in the conductors flows radially into the conductors and accounts for energy lost to resistive heating of the conductor. No energy flows outside the cable, either, since there the magnetic fields of inner and outer conductors cancel to zero.

### Resistive dissipation

If a conductor has significant resistance, then, near the surface of that conductor, the Poynting vector would be tilted toward and impinge upon the conductor. Once the Poynting vector enters the conductor, it is bent to a direction that is almost perpendicular to the surface. This is a consequence of Snell's law and the very slow speed of light inside a conductor. See Hayt page 402 for the definition and computation of the speed of light in a conductor. Inside the conductor, the Poynting vector represents energy flow from the electromagnetic field into the wire, producing resistive Joule heating in the wire. For a derivation that starts with Snell's law see Reitz page 454.

### In plane waves

In a propagating sinusoidal linearly polarized electromagnetic plane wave of a fixed frequency, the Poynting vector always points in the direction of propagation while oscillating in magnitude. The time-averaged magnitude of the Poynting vector is

$\langle S\rangle ={\frac {1}{2\mu _{0}c}}E_{0}^{2}={\frac {\varepsilon _{0}c}{2}}E_{0}^{2},$ where E0 is the peak value of the electric field and c is the speed of light in free space. This time-averaged value is also called the irradiance or intensity I.

#### Derivation

In an electromagnetic plane wave, E and B are always perpendicular to each other and the direction of propagation. Moreover, their amplitudes are related according to

$B_{0}={\frac {1}{c}}E_{0},$ and their time and position dependences are

$E\left(t,{\mathbf {r} }\right)=E_{0}\,\cos \left(\omega \,t-{\mathbf {k} }\cdot {\mathbf {r} }\right),$ $B\left(t,{\mathbf {r} }\right)=B_{0}\,\cos \left(\omega \,t-{\mathbf {k} }\cdot {\mathbf {r} }\right),$ where ω is the frequency of the wave and k is wave vector. The time-dependent and position magnitude of the Poynting vector is then

$S(t)={\frac {1}{\mu _{0}}}E_{0}\,B_{0}\,\cos ^{2}\left(\omega t-{\mathbf {k} }\cdot {\mathbf {r} }\right)={\frac {1}{\mu _{0}c}}E_{0}^{2}\cos ^{2}\left(\omega t-{\mathbf {k} }\cdot {\mathbf {r} }\right)=\varepsilon _{0}cE_{0}^{2}\cos ^{2}\left(\omega t-{\mathbf {k} }\cdot {\mathbf {r} }\right).$ In the last step, we used the equality ε0μ0 = c−2. Since the time- or space-average of cos2tkr) is 1/2, it follows that

$\left\langle S\right\rangle ={\frac {\varepsilon _{0}c}{2}}E_{0}^{2}.$ It will be appreciated that quantitatively the Poynting vector is evaluated only from a prior knowledge of the distribution of electric and magnetic fields, which are calculated by applying boundary conditions to a particular set of physical circumstances, for example a dipole antenna. Therefore the E and H field distributions form the primary object of any analysis, while the Poynting vector remains an interesting by-product.

$P_{rad}={\frac {\langle S\rangle }{c}},$  