Protective index

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Mining Engineer (Excluding Oil ) Truman from Alma, loves to spend time knotting, largest property developers in singapore developers in singapore and stamp collecting. Recently had a family visit to Urnes Stave Church.

The following are proofs of several characteristics related to the chi-squared distribution.

Derivations of the pdf

Derivation of the pdf for one degree of freedom

Let random variable Y be defined as Y = X2 where X has normal distribution with mean 0 and variance 1 (that is X ~ N(0,1)).

Then,

Where and are the cdf and pdf of the corresponding random variables.

Then

Derivation of the pdf for two degrees of freedom

To derive the chi-squared distribution with 2 degrees of freedom, there could be several methods. Here presented is one of them which is based on the distribution with 1 degree of freedom.

Suppose that and are two independent variables satisfying and , so that the probability density functions of and are respectively:

and

Simply, we can derive the joint distribution of and :

where is replaced by . Further, let and , we can get that:

and

or, inversely

and

Since the two variable change policies are symmetric, we take the upper one and multiply the result by 2. The Jacobian determinant can be calculated as:

Now we can change to :

where the leading constant 2 is to take both the two variable change policies into account. Finally, we integrate out to get the distribution of , i.e. :

Let , the equation can be changed to:

So the result is:

Derivation of the pdf for k degrees of freedom

Consider the k samples to represent a single point in a k-dimensional space. The chi square distribution for k degrees of freedom will then be given by:

where is the standard normal distribution and is that elemental shell volume at Q(x), which is proportional to the (k − 1)-dimensional surface in k-space for which

It can be seen that this surface is the surface of a k-dimensional ball or, alternatively, an n-sphere where n = k - 1 with radius , and that the term in the exponent is simply expressed in terms of Q. Since it is a constant, it may be removed from inside the integral.

The integral is now simply the surface area A of the (k − 1)-sphere times the infinitesimal thickness of the sphere which is

The area of a (k − 1)-sphere is:

Substituting, realizing that , and cancelling terms yields: