Solvency cone

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Template:Too technical The solvency cone is a concept used in financial mathematics which models the possible trades in the financial market. This is of particular interest to markets with transaction costs. Specifically, it is the convex cone of portfolios that can be exchanged to portfolios of non-negative components (including paying of any transaction costs).


If given a bid-ask matrix for assets such that and is the number of assets which with any non-negative quantity of them can be "discarded" (traditionally ). Then the solvency cone is the convex cone spanned by the unit vectors and the vectors .[1]


A solvency cone is any closed convex cone such that and .[2]


A process of (random) solvency cones is a model of a financial market. This is sometimes called a market process.

The negative of a solvency cone is the set of portfolios that can be obtained starting from the zero portfolio. This is intimately related to self-financing portfolios.{{ safesubst:#invoke:Unsubst||date=__DATE__ |$B= {{#invoke:Category handler|main}}{{#invoke:Category handler|main}}[citation needed] }}

The dual cone of the solvency cone () are the set of prices which would define a friction-less pricing system for the assets that is consistent with the market. This is also called a consistent pricing system.[1]


Solvency cone with no transaction costs
Sample solvency cone with no transaction costs
Solvency cone with transaction costs
Sample solvency cone with transaction costs

Assume there are 2 assets, A and M with 1 to 1 exchange possible.

Frictionless Market

In a frictionless market, we can obviously make (1A,-1M) and (-1A,1M) into non-negative portfolios, therefore . Note that (1,1) is the "price vector."

With Transaction Costs

Assume further that there is 50% transaction costs for each deal. This means that (1A,-1M) and (-1A,1M) cannot be exchanged into non-negative portfolios. But, (2A,-1M) and (-1A,2M) can be traded into non-negative portfolios. It can be seen that .

The dual cone of prices is thus easiest to see in terms of prices of A in terms of M (and similarly done for price of M in terms of A):


If a solvency cone :


  1. 1.0 1.1 {{#invoke:Citation/CS1|citation |CitationClass=journal }}
  2. Template:Cite doi