String operations
In computer science, in the area of formal language theory, frequent use is made of a variety of string functions; however, the notation used is different from that used on computer programming, and some commonly used functions in the theoretical realm are rarely used when programming. This article defines some of these basic terms.
Strings and languages
A string is a finite sequence of characters. The empty string is denoted by . The concatenation of two string and is denoted by , or shorter by . Concatenating with the empty string makes no difference: . Concatenation of strings is associative: .
A language is a finite or infinite set of strings. Besides the usual set operations like union, intersection etc., concatenation can be applied to languages: if both and are languages, their concatenation is defined as the set of concatenations of any string from and any string from , formally . Again, the concatenation dot is often omitted for shortness.
The language consisting of just the empty string is to be distinguished from the empty language . Concatenating any language with the former doesn't make any change: , while concatenating with the latter always yields the empty language: . Concatenation of languages is associative: .
For example, abbreviating , the set of all three-digit decimal numbers is obtained as . The set of all decimal numbers of arbitrary length is an example for an infinite language.
Alphabet of a string
The alphabet of a string is the set of all of the characters that occur in a particular string. If s is a string, its alphabet is denoted by
The alphabet of a language is the set of all characters that occur in any string of , formally: .
For example, the set is the alphabet of the string , and the above is the alphabet of the above language as well as of the language of all decimal numbers.
String substitution
Let L be a language, and let Σ be its alphabet. A string substitution or simply a substitution is a mapping f that maps letters in Σ to languages (possibly in a different alphabet). Thus, for example, given a letter a ∈ Σ, one has f(a)=L_{a} where L_{a} ⊆ Δ^{*} is some language whose alphabet is Δ. This mapping may be extended to strings as
- f(ε)=ε
for the empty string ε, and
- f(sa)=f(s)f(a)
for string s ∈ L. String substitutions may be extended to entire languages as ^{[1]}
Regular languages are closed under string substitution. That is, if each letter of a regular language is substituted by another regular language, the result is still a regular language.^{[2]} Similarly, context-free languages are closed under string substitution.^{[3]}^{[note 1]}
A simple example is the conversion f_{uc}(.) to upper case, which may be defined e.g. as follows:
letter | mapped to language | remark |
---|---|---|
x | f_{uc}(x) | |
‹a› | { ‹A› } | map lower-case char to corresponding upper-case char |
‹A› | { ‹A› } | map upper-case char to itself |
‹ß› | { ‹SS› } | no upper-case char available, map to two-char string |
‹0› | { ε } | map digit to empty string |
‹!› | { } | forbid punctuation, map to empty language |
... | similar for other chars |
For the extension of f_{uc} to strings, we have e.g.
- f_{uc}(‹Straße›) = {‹S›} ⋅ {‹T›} ⋅ {‹R›} ⋅ {‹A›} ⋅ {‹SS›} ⋅ {‹E›} = {‹STRASSE›},
- f_{uc}(‹u2›) = {‹U} ⋅ {ε} = {‹U›}, and
- f_{uc}(‹Go!›) = {‹G›} ⋅ {‹O›} ⋅ {} = {}.
For the extension of f_{uc} to languages, we have e.g.
- f_{uc}({ ‹Straße›, ‹u2›, ‹Go!› }) = { ‹STRASSE› } ∪ { ‹U› } ∪ { } = { ‹STRASSE›, ‹U› }.
Another example is the conversion of an EBCDIC-encoded string to ASCII.
String homomorphism
A string homomorphism (often referred to simply as a homomorphism in formal language theory) is a string substitution such that each letter is replaced by a single string. That is, f(a)=s, where s is a string, for each letter a.^{[note 2]}^{[4]}
String homomorphisms are monoid morphisms on the free monoid, preserving the binary operation of string concatenation. Given a language L, the set f(L) is called the homomorphic image of L. The inverse homomorphic image of a string s is defined as
- f^{-1}(s) = { w | f(w)=s }
while the inverse homomorphic image of a language L is defined as
- f^{-1}(L) = { s | f(s) ∈ L }
In general, f(f^{-1}(L)) ≠ L, while one does have
- f(f^{-1}(L)) ⊆ L
and
- L ⊆ f^{-1}(f(L))
for any language L.
The class of regular languages is closed under homomorphisms and inverse homomorphisms.^{[5]} Similarly, the context-free languages are closed under homomorphisms^{[note 3]} and inverse homomorphisms.^{[6]}
A string homomorphism is said to be ε-free (or e-free) if f(a) ≠ ε for all a in the alphabet Σ. Simple single-letter substitution ciphers are examples of (ε-free) string homomorphisms.
An example string homomorphism g_{uc} can also be obtained by defining similar to the above substitution: g_{uc}(‹a›) = ‹A›, ..., g_{uc}(‹0›) = ε, but letting g_{uc} undefined on punctuation chars. Examples for inverse homomorphic images are
- g_{uc}^{-1}({ ‹SSS› }) = { ‹sss›, ‹sß›, ‹ßs› }, since g_{uc}(‹sss›) = g_{uc}(‹sß›) = g_{uc}(‹ßs›) = ‹SSS›, and
- g_{uc}^{-1}({ ‹A›, ‹bb› }) = { ‹a› }, since g_{uc}(‹a›) = ‹A›, while ‹bb› cannot be reached by g_{uc}.
For the latter language, g_{uc}(g_{uc}^{-1}({ ‹A›, ‹bb› })) = g_{uc}({ ‹a› }) = { ‹A› } ≠ { ‹A›, ‹bb› }. The homomorphism g_{uc} is not ε-free, since it maps e.g. ‹0› to ε.
String projection
If s is a string, and is an alphabet, the string projection of s is the string that results by removing all letters which are not in . It is written as . It is formally defined by removal of letters from the right hand side:
Here denotes the empty string. The projection of a string is essentially the same as a projection in relational algebra.
String projection may be promoted to the projection of a language. Given a formal language L, its projection is given by
Right quotient
The right quotient of a letter a from a string s is the truncation of the letter a in the string s, from the right hand side. It is denoted as . If the string does not have a on the right hand side, the result is the empty string. Thus:
The quotient of the empty string may be taken:
Similarly, given a subset of a monoid , one may define the quotient subset as
Left quotients may be defined similarly, with operations taking place on the left of a string.
Syntactic relation
The right quotient of a subset of a monoid defines an equivalence relation, called the right syntactic relation of S. It is given by
The relation is clearly of finite index (has a finite number of equivalence classes) if and only if the family right quotients is finite; that is, if
is finite. In this case, S is a recognizable language, that is, a language that can be recognized by a finite state automaton. This is discussed in greater detail in the article on syntactic monoids.
Right cancellation
The right cancellation of a letter a from a string s is the removal of the first occurrence of the letter a in the string s, starting from the right hand side. It is denoted as and is recursively defined as
The empty string is always cancellable:
Clearly, right cancellation and projection commute:
Prefixes
The prefixes of a string is the set of all prefixes to a string, with respect to a given language:
The prefix closure of a language is
A language is called prefix closed if .
The prefix closure operator is idempotent:
The prefix relation is a binary relation such that if and only if . This relation is a particular example of a prefix order.
See also
- Comparison of programming languages (string functions)
- Levi's lemma
- String (computer science) — definition and implementation of more basic operations on strings
Notes
- ↑ Although every regular language is also context-free, the previous theorem is not implied by the current one, since the former yields a shaper result for regular languages.
- ↑ Strictly formally, a homomorphism yields a language consisting of just one string, i.e. f(a) = {s}.
- ↑ This follows from the above-mentioned closure under arbitrary substitutions.
References
- {{#invoke:citation/CS1|citation
|CitationClass=book }} (See chapter 3.)
- ↑ Hopcroft, Ullman (1979), Sect.3.2, p.60
- ↑ Hopcroft, Ullman (1979), Sect.3.2, Theorem 3.4, p.60
- ↑ Hopcroft, Ullman (1979), Sect.6.2, Theorem 6.2, p.131
- ↑ Hopcroft, Ullman (1979), Sect.3.2, p.60-61
- ↑ Hopcroft, Ullman (1979), Sect.3.2, Theorem 3.5, p.61
- ↑ Hopcroft, Ullman (1979), Sect.6.2, Theorem 6.3, p.132