Orthogonal convex hull: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Wizardman
 
en>Incnis Mrsi
normalization of terminology (ℝⁿ does not have “Cartesian coordinates” inside itself, it is Euclidean space which has), cleansing non-standard typography like <math>R^n</math> (Italic) or bare-wiki “K” (Roman)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Claude is her name and she totally digs that title. What she enjoys doing is bottle tops gathering and she is trying to make it a occupation. Bookkeeping is what she does. Arizona has always been my living location but my wife desires us to move.<br><br>My web page: extended car warranty ([http://Www.Itcomplianceexperts.com/UserProfile/tabid/165/userId/36272/Default.aspx Recommended Web-site])
In [[mathematics]], '''Weyl's lemma''', named after [[Hermann Weyl]], states that every weak solution of [[Laplace's equation]] is a [[smooth function|smooth]] solution. This contrasts with the [[wave equation]], for example, which has weak solutions that are not smooth solutions. Weyl's lemma is a special case of [[elliptic PDE|elliptic]] or [[hypoelliptic| hypoelliptic regularity]].
 
==Statement of the lemma==
Let <math>\Omega</math> be an [[open set|open subset]] of <math>n</math>-dimensional Euclidean space <math>\mathbb{R}^{n}</math>, and let <math>\Delta</math> denote the usual [[Laplace operator]]. Weyl's lemma<ref>[[Hermann Weyl]], The method of orthogonal projections in potential theory, ''Duke Math. J.'', 7, 411-444 (1940). See Lemma 2, p. 415</ref> states that if a [[locally integrable]] function <math>u \in L_{\mathrm{loc}}^{1}(\Omega)</math> is a weak solution of Laplace's equation, in the sense that
 
:<math>\int_{\Omega} u(x) \Delta \phi (x) \, dx = 0</math>
 
for every [[smooth function | smooth]] test function <math>\phi \in C_c^\infty(\Omega)</math> with [[compact support]], then (up to redefinition on a set of [[measure zero]]) <math>u \in C^{\infty}(\Omega)</math> is smooth and satisfies <math>\Delta u = 0</math> pointwise in <math>\Omega</math>.
 
This result implies the interior regularity of harmonic functions in <math>\Omega</math>, but it does not say anything about their regularity on the boundary <math>\partial\Omega</math>.  
 
== Idea of the proof ==
To prove Weyl's lemma, one [[Convolution|convolves]] the function <math>u</math> with an appropriate [[mollifier]] <math>\phi_\epsilon</math> and shows that the mollification <math>u_\epsilon = \phi_\epsilon\ast u</math> satisfies Laplace's equation, which implies that <math>u_\epsilon</math> has the mean value property. Taking the limit as <math>\epsilon\to 0</math> and using the properties of mollifiers, one finds that <math>u</math> also has the mean value property, which implies that it is a smooth solution of Laplace's equation.<ref>Bernard Daconorogna, ''Introduction to the Calculus of Variations,'' 2nd ed., Imperial College Press (2009), p. 148.</ref>
 
== Generalization to distributions ==
More generally, the same result holds for every [[Distribution (mathematics) | distributional solution]] of Laplace's equation: If <math>T\in D'(\Omega)</math> satisfies <math>\langle T, \Delta \phi\rangle = 0</math> for every <math>\phi\in C_c^\infty(\Omega)</math>, then <math>T= T_u</math> is a regular distribution associated with a smooth solution <math>u\in C^\infty(\Omega)</math> of Laplace's equation.<ref>[[Lars Gårding]], ''Some Points of Analysis and their History'', AMS (1997), p. 66.</ref>
 
== Connection with hypoellipticity ==
Weyl's lemma follows from more general results concerning the regularity properties of elliptic or hypoelliptic operators.<ref>[[Lars Hörmander]], ''The Analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators I'', 2nd ed., Springer-Verlag (1990), p.110</ref> A linear partial differential operator <math>P</math> with smooth coefficients is hypoelliptic if the [[support (mathematics) | singular support]] of <math>P u</math> is equal to the singular support of <math>u</math> for every distribution <math>u</math>. The Laplace operator is hyperelliptic, so if <math>\Delta u = 0</math>, then the singular support of <math>u</math> is empty since the singular support of <math>0</math> is empty, meaning that <math>u\in C^\infty(\Omega)</math>. In fact, since the Laplacian is elliptic, a stronger result is true, and solutions of  <math>\Delta u = 0</math> are [[analytic function | real-analytic]].
 
==Notes==
{{reflist}}
 
==References==
*{{cite book |title= Elliptic Partial Differential Equations of Second Order |last=Gilbarg |first=David |coauthors=[[Neil Trudinger|Neil S. Trudinger]] | year=1988| publisher=Springer |isbn=3-540-41160-7}}
*{{cite book | first=Elias | last=Stein | authorlink=Elias Stein| year=2005 | title=Real Analysis: Measure Theory, Integration, and Hilbert Spaces | publisher=Princeton University Press | isbn=0-691-11386-6}}
 
[[Category:Lemmas]]
[[Category:Partial differential equations]]
[[Category:Harmonic functions]]

Latest revision as of 21:03, 20 May 2013

In mathematics, Weyl's lemma, named after Hermann Weyl, states that every weak solution of Laplace's equation is a smooth solution. This contrasts with the wave equation, for example, which has weak solutions that are not smooth solutions. Weyl's lemma is a special case of elliptic or hypoelliptic regularity.

Statement of the lemma

Let Ω be an open subset of n-dimensional Euclidean space n, and let Δ denote the usual Laplace operator. Weyl's lemma[1] states that if a locally integrable function uLloc1(Ω) is a weak solution of Laplace's equation, in the sense that

Ωu(x)Δϕ(x)dx=0

for every smooth test function ϕCc(Ω) with compact support, then (up to redefinition on a set of measure zero) uC(Ω) is smooth and satisfies Δu=0 pointwise in Ω.

This result implies the interior regularity of harmonic functions in Ω, but it does not say anything about their regularity on the boundary Ω.

Idea of the proof

To prove Weyl's lemma, one convolves the function u with an appropriate mollifier ϕϵ and shows that the mollification uϵ=ϕϵu satisfies Laplace's equation, which implies that uϵ has the mean value property. Taking the limit as ϵ0 and using the properties of mollifiers, one finds that u also has the mean value property, which implies that it is a smooth solution of Laplace's equation.[2]

Generalization to distributions

More generally, the same result holds for every distributional solution of Laplace's equation: If TD(Ω) satisfies T,Δϕ=0 for every ϕCc(Ω), then T=Tu is a regular distribution associated with a smooth solution uC(Ω) of Laplace's equation.[3]

Connection with hypoellipticity

Weyl's lemma follows from more general results concerning the regularity properties of elliptic or hypoelliptic operators.[4] A linear partial differential operator P with smooth coefficients is hypoelliptic if the singular support of Pu is equal to the singular support of u for every distribution u. The Laplace operator is hyperelliptic, so if Δu=0, then the singular support of u is empty since the singular support of 0 is empty, meaning that uC(Ω). In fact, since the Laplacian is elliptic, a stronger result is true, and solutions of Δu=0 are real-analytic.

Notes

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

References

  • 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  • 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  1. Hermann Weyl, The method of orthogonal projections in potential theory, Duke Math. J., 7, 411-444 (1940). See Lemma 2, p. 415
  2. Bernard Daconorogna, Introduction to the Calculus of Variations, 2nd ed., Imperial College Press (2009), p. 148.
  3. Lars Gårding, Some Points of Analysis and their History, AMS (1997), p. 66.
  4. Lars Hörmander, The Analysis of Linear Partial Differential Operators I, 2nd ed., Springer-Verlag (1990), p.110