Concentration polarization

Template:More footnotes In mathematics, a linear map (also called a linear mapping, linear transformation or, in some contexts, linear function) is a mapping Buying, selling and renting HDB and personal residential properties in Singapore are simple and transparent transactions. Although you are not required to engage a real property salesperson (generally often known as a "public listed property developers In singapore agent") to complete these property transactions, chances are you'll think about partaking one if you are not accustomed to the processes concerned.

Professional agents are readily available once you need to discover an condominium for hire in singapore In some cases, landlords will take into account you more favourably in case your agent comes to them than for those who tried to method them by yourself. You need to be careful, nevertheless, as you resolve in your agent. Ensure that the agent you are contemplating working with is registered with the IEA – Institute of Estate Brokers. Whereas it might sound a hassle to you, will probably be worth it in the end. The IEA works by an ordinary algorithm and regulations, so you'll protect yourself in opposition to probably going with a rogue agent who prices you more than they should for his or her service in finding you an residence for lease in singapore.

There isn't any deal too small. Property agents who are keen to find time for any deal even if the commission is small are the ones you want on your aspect. Additionally they present humbleness and might relate with the typical Singaporean higher. Relentlessly pursuing any deal, calling prospects even without being prompted. Even if they get rejected a hundred times, they still come again for more. These are the property brokers who will find consumers what they need eventually, and who would be the most successful in what they do. 4. Honesty and Integrity

This feature is suitable for you who need to get the tax deductions out of your PIC scheme to your property agency firm. It's endorsed that you visit the correct site for filling this tax return software. This utility must be submitted at the very least yearly to report your whole tax and tax return that you're going to receive in the current accounting 12 months. There may be an official website for this tax filling procedure. Filling this tax return software shouldn't be a tough thing to do for all business homeowners in Singapore.

A wholly owned subsidiary of SLP Worldwide, SLP Realty houses 900 associates to service SLP's fast rising portfolio of residential tasks. Real estate is a human-centric trade. Apart from offering comprehensive coaching applications for our associates, SLP Realty puts equal emphasis on creating human capabilities and creating sturdy teamwork throughout all ranges of our organisational hierarchy. Worldwide Presence At SLP International, our staff of execs is pushed to make sure our shoppers meet their enterprise and investment targets. Under is an inventory of some notable shoppers from completely different industries and markets, who've entrusted their real estate must the expertise of SLP Worldwide.

If you're looking for a real estate or Singapore property agent online, you merely need to belief your instinct. It is because you don't know which agent is sweet and which agent will not be. Carry out research on a number of brokers by looking out the internet. As soon as if you find yourself certain that a selected agent is dependable and trustworthy, you'll be able to choose to utilize his partnerise find you a house in Singapore. More often than not, a property agent is considered to be good if she or he places the contact data on his web site. This is able to imply that the agent does not thoughts you calling them and asking them any questions regarding properties in Singapore. After chatting with them you too can see them of their office after taking an appointment.

Another method by way of which you could find out whether the agent is sweet is by checking the feedback, of the shoppers, on the website. There are various individuals would publish their comments on the web site of the Singapore property agent. You can take a look at these feedback and the see whether it will be clever to hire that specific Singapore property agent. You may even get in contact with the developer immediately. Many Singapore property brokers know the developers and you may confirm the goodwill of the agent by asking the developer. between two modules (including vector spaces) that preserves the operations of addition and scalar multiplication.

By studying the linear maps between two modules one can gain insight into their structures. If the modules have additional structure, like topologies or bornologies, then one can study the subspace of linear maps that preserve this structure.

Topologies of uniform convergence

Suppose that T be any set and that $\mathcal{𝒢}$ be collection of subsets of T. Suppose in addition that Y is a topological vector space (not necessarily Hausdorff or locally convex) and that $\mathcal{𝒩}$ is a basis of neighborhoods of 0 in Y. Then the set of all functions from T into Y, $Y^T$, can be given a unique translation-invariant topology by defining a basis of neighborhoods of 0 in $Y^T$, to be

$\mathcal{𝒰}(G,N)=\{f\in Y^T:f(G)\subseteq N\}$

as G and N range over all $G\in \mathcal{𝒢}$ and $N\in \mathcal{𝒩}$. This topology does not depend on the basis $\mathcal{𝒩}$ that was chosen and it is known as the topology of uniform convergence on the sets in $\mathcal{𝒢}$ or as the $\mathcal{𝒢}$-topology. In practice, $\mathcal{𝒢}$ usually consists of a collection of sets with certain properties and this name is changed appropriately to reflect this set so that if, for instance, $\mathcal{𝒢}$ is the collection of compact subsets of T (and T is a topological space), then this topology is called the topology of uniform convergence on the compact subsets of T. A set ${\mathcal{𝒢}}_1$ of $\mathcal{𝒢}$ is said to be fundamental with respect to $\mathcal{𝒢}$ if each $G\in \mathcal{𝒢}$ is a subset of some element in ${\mathcal{𝒢}}_1$. In this case, the collection $\mathcal{𝒢}$ can be replaced by ${\mathcal{𝒢}}_1$ without changing the topology on $Y^T$.

However, the $\mathcal{𝒢}$-topology on $Y^T$ is not necessarily compatible with the vector space structure of $Y^T$ or of any of its vector subspaces (that is, it is not necessarily a topological vector space topology on $Y^T$). Suppose that F is a vector subspace $Y^T$ so that it inherits the subspace topology from $Y^T$. Then the $\mathcal{𝒢}$-topology on F is compatible with the vector space structure of F if and only if for every $G\in \mathcal{𝒢}$ and every f ∈ F, f(G) is bounded in Y.

If Y is locally convex then so is the $\mathcal{𝒢}$-topology on $Y^T$ and if $(p_{\alpha })$ is a family of continuous seminorms generating this topology on Y then the $\mathcal{𝒢}$-topology is induced by the following family of seminorms: $p_{G,\alpha }(f)={\sup }_{x\in G}{p}_{\alpha }(f(x))$, as G varies over $\mathcal{𝒢}$ and $\alpha$ varies over all indices. If Y is Hausdorff and T is a topological space such that $\bigcup _{G\in \mathcal{𝒢}}G$ is dense in T then the $\mathcal{𝒢}$-topology on subspace of $Y^T$ consisting of all continuous maps is Hausdorff. If the topological space T is also a topological vector space, then the condition that $\bigcup _{G\in \mathcal{𝒢}}G$ be dense in T can be replaced by the weaker condition that the linear span of this set be dense in T, in which case we say that this set is total in T.

Let H be a subset of $Y^T$. Then H is bounded in the $\mathcal{𝒢}$-topology if and only if for every $G\in \mathcal{𝒢}$, ${\cup }_{u\in H}u(G)$ is bounded in Y.

Spaces of continuous linear maps

Throughout this section we will assume that X and Y are topological vector spaces and we will let L(X, Y), denote the vector space of all continuous linear maps from X and Y. If L(X, Y) if given the $\mathcal{𝒢}$-topology inherited from $Y^X$ then this space with this topology is denoted by $L_{\mathcal{𝒢}}(X,Y)$. The $\mathcal{𝒢}$-topology on L(X, Y) is compatible with the vector space structure of L(X, Y) if and only if for all $G\in \mathcal{𝒢}$ and all f ∈ L(X, Y) the set f(G) is bounded in Y, which we will assume to be the case for the rest of the article. Note in particular that this is the case if $\mathcal{𝒢}$ consists of (von-Neumann) bounded subsets of X.

Often, $\mathcal{𝒢}$ is required to satisfy the following two axioms:

${\mathcal{𝒢}}_1$:	If ${G_1}^{\prime },{G_2}^{\prime }\in {\mathcal{𝒢}}^{\prime }$ then there exists a $G^{\prime }\in {\mathcal{𝒢}}^{\prime }$ such that ${G_1}^{\prime }\cup {G_2}^{\prime }\subseteq G^{\prime }$.
${\mathcal{𝒢}}_2$:	If ${G_1}^{\prime }\in {\mathcal{𝒢}}^{\prime }$ and $\lambda$ is a scalar then there exists a $G^{\prime }\in {\mathcal{𝒢}}^{\prime }$ such that $\lambda {G_1}^{\prime }\subseteq G^{\prime }$.

If $\mathcal{𝒢}$ is a bornology on X. which is often the case, then these two axioms are satisfied.

Properties

Completeness

For the following theorems, suppose that X is a topological vector space and Y is a locally convex Hausdorff spaces and $\mathcal{𝒢}$ is a collection of bounded subsets of X that satisfies axioms ${\mathcal{𝒢}}_1$ and ${\mathcal{𝒢}}_2$ and forms a covering of X.

• $L_{\mathcal{𝒢}}(X,Y)$ is complete if

• If X is a Mackey space then $L_{\mathcal{𝒢}}(X,Y)$ is complete if and only if both $X_{\mathcal{𝒢}}^{*}$ and Y are complete.
• If X is barrelled then $L_{\mathcal{𝒢}}(X,Y)$ is Hausdorff and quasi-complete, which means that every closed and bounded set is complete.

Boundedness

Let X and Y be topological vector space and H be a subset of L(X, Y). Then the following are equivalent:

• H is bounded in $L_{\mathcal{𝒢}}(X,Y)$,
• For every $G\in \mathcal{𝒢}$, ${\cup }_{u\in H}u(G)$ is bounded in Y,
• For every neighborhood of 0, V, in Y the set ${\cap }_{u\in H}{u}^{-1}(V)$ absorbs every $G\in \mathcal{𝒢}$.

Furthermore,

• If X and Y are locally convex Hausdorff space and if H is bounded in $L_{\sigma }(X,Y)$ (i.e. pointwise bounded or simply bounded) then it is bounded in the topology of uniform convergence on the convex, balanced, bounded, complete subsets of X.
• If X and Y are locally convex Hausdorff spaces and if X is quasi-complete (i.e. closed and bounded subsets are complete), then the bounded subsets of L(X, Y) are identical for all $\mathcal{𝒢}$-topologies where $\mathcal{𝒢}$ is any family of bounded subsets of X covering X.
• If $\mathcal{𝒢}$ is any collection of bounded subsets of X whose union is total in X then every equicontinuous subset of L(X, Y) is bounded in the $\mathcal{𝒢}$-topology.

Examples

The topology of pointwise convergence L_{σ(X, Y)}

By letting $\mathcal{𝒢}$ be the set of all finite subsets of X, L(X, Y) will have the weak topology on L(X, Y) or the topology of pointwise convergence and L(X, Y) with this topology is denoted by $L_{\sigma }(X,Y)$

The weak-topology on L(X, Y) has the following properties:

• The weak-closure of an equicontinuous subset of L(X, Y) is equicontinuous.
• If Y is locally convex, then the convex balanced hull of an equicontinuous subset of $L_{(}X,Y)$ is equicontinuous.
• If A ⊆ X is a contable dense subset of a topological vector space X and if Y is a metrizable topological vector space then $L_{\sigma }(X,Y)$ is metrizable.
  • So in particular, on every equicontinuous subset of L(X, Y), the topology of pointwise convergence is metrizable.
• Let $Y^X$ denote the space of all functions from X into Y. If $F(X,Y)$ is given the topology of pointwise convergence then space of all linear maps (continuous or not) X into Y is closed in $Y^X$.
  • In addition, L(X, Y) is dense in the space of all linear maps (continuous or not) X into Y.

Compact-convex convergence L_γ(X, Y)

By letting $\mathcal{𝒢}$ be the set of all compact convex subsets of X, L(X, Y) will have the the topology of compact convex convergence or the topology of uniform convergence on compact convex sets L(X, Y) with this topology is denoted by $L_{\gamma }(X,Y)$.

Compact convergence L_c(X, Y)

By letting $\mathcal{𝒢}$ be the set of all compact subsets of X, L(X, Y) will have the the topology of compact convergence or the topology of uniform convergence on compact sets and L(X, Y) with this topology is denoted by $L_c(X,Y)$.

The topology of bounded convergence on L(X, Y) has the following properties:

• If X is a Frechet space or a LF-space and if Y is a complete locally convex Hausdorff space then $L_c(X,Y)$ is complete.
• On equicontinuous subsets of L(X, Y), the following topologies coincide:
  • The topology of pointwise convergence on a dense subset of X,
  • The topology of pointwise convergence on X,
  • The topology of compact convergence.
• If X is a Montel space and Y is a topological vector space, then $L_c(X,Y)$ and $L_b(X,Y)$ have identical topologies.

Strong dual topology L_b(X, Y)

By letting $\mathcal{𝒢}$ be the set of all bounded subsets of X, L(X, Y) will have the the topology of bounded convergence on X or the topology of uniform convergence on bounded sets and L(X, Y) with this topology is denoted by $L_b(X,Y)$.

The topology of bounded convergence on L(X, Y) has the following properties:

• If X is a bornological space and if Y is a complete locally convex Hausdorff space then $L_b(X,Y)$ is complete.
• If X and Y are both normed spaces then $L_b(X,Y)$ is a normed space with the usual operator norm.
• Every equicontinuous subset of L(X, Y) is bounded in $L_b(X,Y)$.

G-topologies on the continuous dual induced by X

The continuous dual space of a topological vector space X over the field $\mathcal{ℱ}$ (which we will assume to be real or complex numbers) is the vector space $L(X,\mathcal{ℱ})$ and is denoted by $X^{*}$ and sometimes by $X^{\prime }$. Given $\mathcal{𝒢}$, a set of subsets of X, we can apply all of the preceding to this space by using $Y=\mathcal{ℱ}$ and in this case $X^{*}$ with this $\mathcal{𝒢}$-topology is denoted by $X_{\mathcal{𝒢}}^{*}$, so that in particular we have the following basic properties:

• A basis of neighborhoods of 0 for $X_{\mathcal{𝒢}}^{*}$ is formed, as $G$ varies over $\mathcal{𝒢}$, by the polar sets $G^{\circ }:=\{x^{\prime }\in X^{*}:{\sup }_{x\in G}|⟨x^{\prime },x⟩|\le 1\}$.
  • A filter $F^{\prime }$ on $X^{*}$ converges to an element $x^{\prime }\in X^{*}$ in the $\mathcal{𝒢}$-topology on $X^{*}$ if $F^{\prime }$ uniformly to $x^{\prime }$ on each $G\in \mathcal{𝒢}$.
  • If G ⊆ X is bounded then $G^{\circ }$ is absorbing, so $\mathcal{𝒢}$ usually consists of bounded subsets of X.
• $X_{\mathcal{𝒢}}^{*}$ is locally convex,
• If $\bigcup _{G\in \mathcal{𝒢}}G$ is dense in X then $X_{\mathcal{𝒢}}^{*}$ is Hausdorff.
• If $\bigcup _{G\in \mathcal{𝒢}}G$ covers X then the canonical map from X into $(X_{\mathcal{𝒢}}^{*}{)}^{*}$ is well-defined. That is, for all $x\in X$ the evaluation functional on $X^{*}$ (i.e. $x^{\prime }\in X^{*}\mapsto ⟨x^{\prime },x⟩$) is continuous on $X_{\mathcal{𝒢}}^{*}$.
  • If in addition $X^{*}$ separates points on X then the canonical map of X into $(X_{\mathcal{𝒢}}^{*}{)}^{*}$ is an injection.
• Suppose that X and Y are two topological vector spaces and $u:E\to F$ is a continuous linear map. Suppose that $\mathcal{𝒢}$ and $\mathcal{\mathscr{H}}$ are collections of bounded subsets of X and Y, respectively, that both satisfy axioms ${\mathcal{𝒢}}_1$ and ${\mathcal{𝒢}}_2$. Then $u$'s transpose, ${}^{t}u:Y_{\mathcal{\mathscr{H}}}^{*}\to X_{\mathcal{𝒢}}^{*}$ is continuous if for every $G\in \mathcal{𝒢}$ there is a $H\in \mathcal{\mathscr{H}}$ such that u(G) ⊆ H.
  • In particular, the transpose of $u$ is continuous if $X^{*}$ caries the $\sigma (X^{*},X)$ (respectively, $\gamma (X^{*},X)$, $c(X^{*},X)$, $b(X^{*},X)$) topology and $Y^{*}$ carry any topology stronger than the $\sigma (Y^{*},Y)$ topology (respectively, $\gamma (Y^{*},Y)$, $c(Y^{*},Y)$, $b(Y^{*},Y)$).
• If X is a locally convex Hausdorff topological vector space over the field $\mathcal{ℱ}$ and $\mathcal{𝒢}$ is a collection of bounded subsets of X that satisfies axioms ${\mathcal{𝒢}}_1$ and ${\mathcal{𝒢}}_2$ then the bilinear map $X\times X_{\mathcal{𝒢}}^{*}\to \mathcal{ℱ}$ defined by $(x,x^{\prime })\mapsto ⟨x^{\prime },x⟩=x^{\prime }(x)$ is continuous if and only if X is normable and the $\mathcal{𝒢}$-topology on $X^{*}$ is the strong dual topology $b(X^{*},X)$.
• Suppose that X is a Frechet space and $\mathcal{𝒢}$ is a collection of bounded subsets of X that satisfies axioms ${\mathcal{𝒢}}_1$ and ${\mathcal{𝒢}}_2$. If $\mathcal{𝒢}$ contains all compact subsets of X then $X_{\mathcal{𝒢}}^{*}$ is complete.

Examples

The weak topology σ(X^*, A) or the weak* topology

By letting $\mathcal{𝒢}$ be the set of all finite subsets of X, $X^{*}$ will have the weak topology on $X^{*}$ more comonly known as the weak* topology or the topology of pointwise convergence, which is denoted by $\sigma (X^{*},X)$ and $X^{*}$ with this topology is denoted by $X_{\sigma }^{*}$ or by $X_{\sigma (X^{*},X)}^{*}$ if there may be ambiguity.

The $\sigma (X^{*},X)$ topology has the following properties:

• Theorem (S. Banach): Suppose that X and Y are Frechet spaces or that they are duals of reflexive Frechet spaces and that $u:X\to Y$ is a continuous linear map. Then $u$ is surjective if and only if the transpose of $u$, ${}^{t}u:Y^{*}\to X^{*}$, is one-to-one and the range of ${}^{t}u$ is weakly closed in $X_{\sigma (X^{*},X)}^{*}$.
• Suppose that X and Y are Frechet spaces, $Z$ is a Hausdorff locally convex space and that $u:X_{\sigma }^{*}\times Y_{\sigma }^{*}\to Z_{\sigma }^{*}$ is a separately-continuous bilinear map. Then $u:X_b^{*}\times Y_b^{*}\to Z_b^{*}$ is continuous.
  • In particular, any separately continuous bilinear maps from the product of two duals of reflexive Frechet spaces into a third one is continuous.
• $X_{\sigma (X^{*},X)}^{*}$ is normable if and only if X is finite dimensional.
• When X is infinite dimensional the $\sigma (X^{*},X)$ topology on $X^{*}$ is strictly less fine than the strong dual topology $b(X^{*},X)$.
• The $\sigma (X^{*},X)$-closure of the convex balanced hull of an equicontinuous subset of $X^{*}$ is equicontinuous and $\sigma (X^{*},X)$-compact.
• Suppose that X is a locally convex Hausdorff space and that $\hat{X}$ is its completion. If $X\ne \hat{X}$ then $\sigma (X^{*},\hat{X})$ is strictly finer than $\sigma (X^{*},X)$.
• Any equicontinuous subset in the dual of a separable Hausdorff locally convex vector space is metrizable in the $\sigma (X^{*},X)$ topology.

Compact-convex convergence γ(X^*, X)

By letting $\mathcal{𝒢}$ be the set of all compact convex subsets of X, $X^{*}$ will have the the topology of compact convex convergence or the topology of uniform convergence on compact convex sets, which is denoted by $\gamma (X^{*},X)$ and $X^{*}$ with this topology is denoted by $X_{\gamma }^{*}$ or by $X_{\gamma (X^{*},X)}^{*}$.

• If X is a Frechet space then the topologies $\gamma (X^{*},X)=c(X^{*},X)$.

Compact convergence c(X^*, X)

By letting $\mathcal{𝒢}$ be the set of all compact subsets of X, $X^{*}$ will have the the topology of compact convergence or the topology of uniform convergence on compact sets, which is denoted by $c(X^{*},X)$ and $X^{*}$ with this topology is denoted by $X_c^{*}$ or by $X_{c(X^{*},X)}^{*}$.

• If X is a Frechet space or a LF-space then $c(X^{*},X)$ is complete.
• Suppose that X is a metrizable topological vector space and that $W^{\prime }\subseteq X^{*}$. If the intersection of $W^{\prime }$ with every equicontinuous subset of $X^{*}$ is weakly-open, then $W^{\prime }$ is open in $c(X^{*},X)$.

Precompact convergence

By letting $\mathcal{𝒢}$ be the set of all precompact subsets of X, $X^{*}$ will have the the topology of precompact convergence or the topology of uniform convergence on precompact sets.

• Alaoglu–Bourbaki Theorem: An equicontinuous subset K of $X^{*}$ has compact closure in the topology the topology of uniform convergence on precompact sets. Furthermore, this topology on K coincides with the $\sigma (X^{*},X)$ topology.

Mackey topology τ(X^*, X)

By letting $\mathcal{𝒢}$ be the set of all convex balanced weakly compact subsets of X, $X^{*}$ will have the Mackey topology on $X^{*}$ or the topology of uniform convergence on convex balanced weakly compact sets, which is denoted by $\tau (X^{*},X)$ and $X^{*}$ with this topology is denoted by $X_{\tau (X^{*},X)}^{*}$.

Strong dual topology b(X^*, X)

By letting $\mathcal{𝒢}$ be the set of all bounded subsets of X, $X^{*}$ will have the the topology of bounded convergence on X or the topology of uniform convergence on bounded sets or the strong dual topology on $X^{*}$, which is denoted by $b(X^{*},X)$ and $X^{*}$ with this topology is denoted by $X_b^{*}$ or by $X_{b(X^{*},X)}^{*}$. Due to its importance, the continuous dual space of $X_b^{*}$, which is commonly denoted by $X^{**}$ so that $(X_b^{*}{)}^{*}=X^{**}$.

The $b(X^{*},X)$ topology has the following properties:

• If X is locally convex, then this topology is finer than all other $\mathcal{𝒢}$-topologies on $X^{*}$ when considering only $\mathcal{𝒢}$'s whose sets are subsets of X.
• If X is a bornological space (ex: metrizable or LF-space) then $X_{b(X^{*},X)}^{*}$is complete.
• If X is a normed space then the strong dual topology on $X^{*}$ may be defined by the norm $\Vert x^{\prime }\Vert ={\sup }_{x\in X,,\Vert x\Vert =1}|⟨x^{\prime },x⟩|$, where $x^{\prime }\in X^{*}$.
• Given a Hausdorff locally convex topological vector space X, the following properties are equivalent:

• If X is a LF-space that is the inductive limit of the sequence of space $X_k$ (for $k=0,1\dots$) then $X_{b(X^{*},X)}^{*}$ is a Frechet space if and only if all $X_k$ are normable.
• If X is a Montel space then
  • $X_{b(X^{*},X)}^{*}$ has the Heine–Broel property (i.e. every closed and bounded subset of $X_{b(X^{*},X)}^{*}$ is compact in $X_{b(X^{*},X)}^{*}$)
  • On bounded subsets of $X_{b(X^{*},X)}^{*}$, the strong and weak topologies coincide (and hence so do all other topologies finer than $\sigma (X^{*},X)$ and coarser than $b(X^{*},X)$).
  • Every weakly convergent sequence in $X^{*}$ is strongly convergent.

Mackey topology τ(X^*, X^**)

By letting ${\mathcal{𝒢}}^{″}$ be the set of all convex balanced weakly compact subsets of $X^{**}=(X_b^{*}{)}^{*}$, $X^{*}$ will have the Mackey topology on $X^{*}$ induced by $X^{**}$' or the topology of uniform convergence on convex balanced weakly compact subsets of $X^{**}$, which is denoted by $\tau (X^{*},X^{**})$ and $X^{*}$ with this topology is denoted by $X_{\tau (X^{*},X^{**})}^{*}$.

• This topology is finer than $b(X^{*},X)$ and hence finer than $\tau (X^{*},X)$.

Other examples

Other $\mathcal{𝒢}$-topologies on $X^{*}$ include

• The topology of uniform convergence on convex balanced complete bounded subsets of X.
• The topology of uniform convergence on convex balanced infracomplete bounded subsets of X.

G-topologies on X induced by the continuous dual

There is a canonical map from X into $(X_{\sigma }^{*}{)}^{*}$ which maps an element $x\in X$ to the following map: $x^{\prime }\in X^{*}\mapsto ⟨x^{\prime },x⟩$. By using this canonical map we can identify X as being contained in the continuous dual of $X_{\sigma }^{*}$ (that is, continued in $(X_{\sigma }^{*}{)}^{*}$). In fact, this canonical map is onto, which means that $X=(X_{\sigma }^{*}{)}^{*}$ so that we can through this canonical isomorphism think of X as the continuous dual space of $X_{\sigma }^{*}$. Note that it is a common convention that if an equal sign appears between two sets which are clearly not equal, then the equality really means that the sets are isomorphic through some canonical map.

Since we are now regarding X as the continuous dual space of $X_{\sigma }^{*}$, we can look at sets of subsets of $X_{\sigma }^{*}$, say ${\mathcal{𝒢}}^{\prime }$ and construct a dual space topology on the dual of $X_{\sigma }^{*}$, which is X. * A basis of neighborhoods of 0 for $X_{{\mathcal{𝒢}}^{\prime }}$ is formed by the Polar sets $G{\text{'}}^{\circ }:=\{x\in X:{\sup }_{x^{\prime }\in G^{\prime }}|⟨x^{\prime },x⟩|\le 1\}$ as $G^{\prime }$ varies over ${\mathcal{𝒢}}^{\prime }$.

Examples

The weak topology σ(X, X^*)

By letting ${\mathcal{𝒢}}^{\prime }$ be the set of all finite subsets of $X^{\prime }$, X will have the weak topology or the topology of pointwise convergence on $X^{*}$, which is denoted by $\sigma (X,X^{*})$ and X with this topology is denoted by $X_{\sigma }$ or by $X_{\sigma (X,X^{*})}$ if there may be ambiguity.

• Suppose that X and Y are Hausdorff locally convex spaces with X metrizable and that $u:X\to Y$ is a linear map. Then $u:X\to Y$ is continuous if and only if $u:\sigma (X,X^{*})\to \sigma (Y,Y^{*})$ is continuous. That is, $u:X\to Y$ is continuous when X and Y carry their given topologies if and only if $u$ is continuous when X and Y carry their weak topologies.

Convergence on equicontinuous sets ε(X, X^*)

By letting ${\mathcal{𝒢}}^{\prime }$ be the set of all equicontinuous subsets $X^{*}$, X will have the the topology of uniform convergence on equicontinuous subsets of $X^{*}$, which is denoted by $ϵ(X,X^{*})$ and X with this topology is denoted by $X_{ϵ}$ or by $X_{ϵ(X,X^{*})}$.

• If ${\mathcal{𝒢}}^{\prime }$ was the set of all convex balanced weakly compact equicontinuous subsets of $X^{*}$, then the same topology would have been induced.
• If X is locally convex and Hausdorff then X's given topology (i.e. the topology that X started with) is exactly $ϵ(X,X^{*})$.

Mackey topology τ(X, X^*)

By letting ${\mathcal{𝒢}}^{\prime }$ be the set of all convex balanced weakly compact subsets of $X^{*}$, X will have the Mackey topology on X or the topology of uniform convergence on convex balanced weakly compact subsets of $X^{*}$, which is denoted by $\tau (X,X^{*})$ and X with this topology is denoted by $X_{\tau }$ or by $X_{\tau (X,X^{*})}$.

• Suppose that X is a locally convex Hausdorff space. If X is metrizable or barrelled then the initial topology of X is identical to the Mackey topology $\tau (X,X^{*})$.

Bounded convergence b(X, X^*)

By letting $\mathcal{𝒢}$ be the set of all bounded subsets of X, $X^{*}$ will have the the topology of bounded convergence or the topology of uniform convergence on bounded sets, which is denoted by $b(X,X^{*})$ and $X^{*}$ with this topology is denoted by $X_b^{*}$ or by $X_{b(X,X^{*})}^{*}$.

The Mackey–Arens theorem

Let X be a vector space and let Y be a vector subspace of the algebraic dual of X that separates points on X. Any locally convex Hausdorff topological vector space (TVS) topology on X with the property that when X is equipped with this topology has Y as its the continuous dual space is said to be compatible with duality between X and Y. If we give X the weak topology $\sigma (X,Y)$ then $X_{\sigma (X,Y)}$ is a Hausdorff locally convex topological vector space (TVS) and $\sigma (X,Y)$ is compatible with duality between X and Y (i.e. $X_{\sigma (X,Y)}^{*}=(X_{\sigma (X,Y)}{)}^{*}=Y$). We can now ask the question: what are all of the locally convex Hausdorff TVS topologies that we can place on X that are compatible with duality between X and Y? The answer to this question is called the Mackey–Arens theorem:

Theorem. Let X be a vector space and let $\mathcal{𝒯}$ be a locally convex Hausdorff topological vector space topology on X. Let $X^{*}$ denote the continuous dual space of X and let $X_{\mathcal{𝒯}}$ denote X with the topology $\mathcal{𝒯}$. Then the following are equivalent: Template:Ordered list And furthermore, Template:Ordered list

G-H-topologies on spaces of bilinear maps

We will let $\mathcal{ℬ}(X,Y;Z)$ denote the space of separately continuous bilinear maps and $B(X,Y;Z)$ denote its subspace the space of continuous bilinear maps, where $X,Y$ and $Z$ are topological vector space over the same field (either the real or complex numbers). In an analogous way to how we placed a topology on L(X, Y) we can place a topology on $\mathcal{ℬ}(X,Y;Z)$ and $B(X,Y;Z)$.

Let $\mathcal{𝒢}$ be a set of subsets of X, $\mathcal{\mathscr{H}}$ be a set of subsets of Y. Let Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle \mathcal{G} × \mathcal{H}} denote the collection of all sets G × H where $G\in \mathcal{𝒢}$, $H\in \mathcal{\mathscr{H}}$. We can place on Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle Z^{X × Y}} the Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle \mathcal{G} × \mathcal{H}} -topology, and consequently on any of its subsets, in particular on $B(X,Y;Z)$ and on $\mathcal{ℬ}(X,Y;Z)$. This topology is known as the $\mathcal{𝒢}-\mathcal{\mathscr{H}}$-topology or as the topology of uniform convergence on the products $G\times H$ of $\mathcal{𝒢}\times \mathcal{\mathscr{H}}$.

However, as before, this topology is not necessarily compatible with the vector space structure of $\mathcal{ℬ}(X,Y;Z)$ or of $B(X,Y;Z)$ without the additional requirement that for all bilinear maps, $b$ in this space (that is, in $\mathcal{ℬ}(X,Y;Z)$ or in $B(X,Y;Z)$) and for all $G\in \mathcal{𝒢}$ and $H\in \mathcal{\mathscr{H}}$ the set $b(G,H)$ is bounded in X. If both $\mathcal{𝒢}$ and $\mathcal{\mathscr{H}}$ consist of bounded sets then this requirement is automatically satisfied if we are topologizing $B(X,Y;Z)$ but this may not be the case if we are trying to topologize $\mathcal{ℬ}(X,Y;Z)$. The $\mathcal{𝒢}$-$\mathcal{\mathscr{H}}$-topology on $\mathcal{ℬ}(X,Y;Z)$ will be compatible with the vector space structure of $\mathcal{ℬ}(X,Y;Z)$ if both $\mathcal{𝒢}$ and $\mathcal{\mathscr{H}}$ consists of bounded sets and any of the following conditions hold:

• X and Y are barrelled spaces and $Z$ is locally convex.
• X is a F-space, Y is metrizable, and $Z$ is Hausdorff, in which case $\mathcal{ℬ}(X,Y;Z)=B(X,Y;Z)$,.
• $X,Y$, and $Z$ are the strong duals of reflexive Frechet spaces.
• X is normed and Y and $Z$ the strong duals of reflexive Frechet spaces.

The ε-topology

Suppose that $X,Y$, and $Z$ are locally convex spaces and let $\mathcal{𝒢}$' and $\mathcal{\mathscr{H}}$' be the collections of equicontinuous subsets of $X^{*}$ and $Y^{*}$, respectively. Then the $\mathcal{𝒢}$'-$\mathcal{\mathscr{H}}$'-topology on $\mathcal{ℬ}(X_{b(X^{*},X)}^{*},Y_{b(X^{*},X)}^{*};Z)$ will be a topological vector space topology. This topology is called the ε-topology and $\mathcal{ℬ}(X_{b(X^{*},X)}^{*},Y_{b(X^{*},X)};Z)$ with this topology it is denoted by ${\mathcal{ℬ}}_{ϵ}(X_{b(X^{*},X)}^{*},Y_{b(X^{*},X)}^{*};Z)$ or simply by ${\mathcal{ℬ}}_{ϵ}(X_b^{*},Y_b^{*};Z)$.

Part of the importance of this vector space and this topology is that it contains many subspace, such as $\mathcal{ℬ}(X_{\sigma (X^{*},X)}^{*},Y_{\sigma (X^{*},X)}^{*};Z)$, which we denote by $\mathcal{ℬ}(X_{\sigma }^{*},Y_{\sigma }^{*};Z)$. When this subspace is given the subspace topology of ${\mathcal{ℬ}}_{ϵ}$$(X_b^{*},Y_b^{*};Z)$ it is denoted by ${\mathcal{ℬ}}_{ϵ}(X_{\sigma }^{*},Y_{\sigma }^{*};Z)$.

In the instance where Z is the field of these vector spaces $\mathcal{ℬ}(X_{\sigma }^{*},Y_{\sigma }^{*})$ is a tensor product of X and Y. In fact, if X and Y are locally convex Hausdorff spaces then $\mathcal{ℬ}(X_{\sigma }^{*},Y_{\sigma }^{*})$ is vector space isomorphic to $L(X_{\sigma (X^{*},X)}^{*},Y_{\sigma (Y^{*},Y)})$, which is in tern equal to $L(X_{\tau (X^{*},X)}^{*},Y)$.

These spaces have the following properties:

• If X and Y are locally convex Hausdorff spaces then ${\mathcal{ℬ}}_{ϵ}$$(X_{\sigma }^{*},Y_{\sigma }^{*})$ is complete if and only if both X and Y are complete.
• If X and Y are both normed (or both Banach) then so is ${\mathcal{ℬ}}_{ϵ}$$(X_{\sigma }^{*},Y_{\sigma }^{*})$

See also

• Bornological space
• Bounded linear operator
• Operator norm
• Uniform convergence
• Uniform space
• Polar topology

References

• 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.
  
  My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
• 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.
  
  My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
• Template:Cite isbn
• Template:Cite isbn

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.