Artificial gravity: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Lyla1205
 
en>Matt Whyndham
→‎Rotation: Added a new image to demonstrate the result of the functions of (g, R, rpm) for a useful range of values
Line 1: Line 1:
== this is the breakdown of box ==
[[Image:argument principle1.svg|frame|right|The simple contour ''C'' (black), the zeros of ''f'' (blue) and the poles of ''f'' (red). Here we have <math>\oint_{C} {f'(z) \over f(z)}\, dz=2\pi i (4-5)</math>.]]


Power is still great. Which had edged [http://www.nrcil.net/fancybox/lib/rakuten_LV_24.html ルイヴィトン 帽子] penetrate through this box.<br><br>'Lee, this, this device if there is a radar guided devices, may not be a problem.'<br><br>'Open it.' Yao-roaring read one of these professionals.<br><br>These professionals also know ......<br><br>in front of the boss's temper, I am afraid that once the laser cannon damage can not be assembled, then [http://www.nrcil.net/fancybox/lib/rakuten_LV_84.html ルイヴィトン メンズ 財布] they [http://www.nrcil.net/fancybox/lib/rakuten_LV_31.html ルイヴィトン バックパック] do not use these personnel may be only one result - it was kill the boss! Immediately dismantling these professionals even open the box.<br><br>'Crash!' box opens.<br><br>Klein [http://www.nrcil.net/fancybox/lib/rakuten_LV_56.html ルイヴィトン 長財布 中古] a stare: [http://www.nrcil.net/fancybox/lib/rakuten_LV_1.html ルイヴィトン限定財布] 'energy?'<br><br>'energy?' next [http://www.nrcil.net/fancybox/lib/rakuten_LV_8.html ルイヴィトンモノグラムバック] to all [http://www.nrcil.net/fancybox/lib/rakuten_LV_119.html ルイヴィトン 肩掛けバッグ] professionals is also a stare.<br><br>'? how the' next Yao-staring Klein, Klein carefully looked at the box, even excited to Li Yao said: 'Lee, our luck [http://www.nrcil.net/fancybox/lib/rakuten_LV_49.html ルイヴィトン ケース] is wonderful, this is the breakdown of box, where
In [[complex analysis]], the '''argument principle''' (or '''Cauchy's argument principle''') relates the difference between the number of [[Zero (complex analysis)|zeros]] and [[Pole (complex analysis)|poles]] of a [[meromorphic function]] to a [[contour integral]] of the function's [[logarithmic derivative]].
相关的主题文章:
<ul>
 
  <li>[http://www.zhztq.com/plus/feedback.php?aid=4199 http://www.zhztq.com/plus/feedback.php?aid=4199]</li>
 
  <li>[http://wiki.the-planetoid-series.com/index.php?title=Main_Page http://wiki.the-planetoid-series.com/index.php?title=Main_Page]</li>
 
  <li>[http://www.orikasa.org/light/light.cgi http://www.orikasa.org/light/light.cgi]</li>
 
</ul>


== he just has a small universe ==
Specifically, if ''f''(''z'') is a meromorphic function inside and on some closed contour ''C'', and ''f'' has no [[Zero (complex analysis)|zeros]] or [[Pole (complex analysis)|poles]] on ''C'', then
: <math>\oint_{C} {f'(z) \over f(z)}\, dz=2\pi i (N-P)</math>
where ''N'' and ''P'' denote respectively the number of zeros and poles of ''f''(''z'') inside the contour ''C'', with each zero and pole counted as many times as its [[Multiplicity (mathematics)|multiplicity]] and [[Pole (complex analysis)|order]], respectively, indicate. This statement of the theorem assumes that the contour ''C'' is simple, that is, without self-intersections, and that it is oriented counter-clockwise.


Skeletal [http://www.nrcil.net/fancybox/lib/rakuten_LV_45.html ルイヴィトン 財布 メンズ エピ] eyes of the Lord has a slightly bitter taste, but still grateful to be [http://www.nrcil.net/fancybox/lib/rakuten_LV_9.html ルイヴィトン バッグ 通販] ordered mouth<br><br>'do not have the slightest resistance.' community indifference beast looked at him mouth<br><br>'am.' [http://www.nrcil.net/fancybox/lib/rakuten_LV_49.html ルイヴィトン ケース] bones of the body should be crossing the main respectful<br>This is the first sector<br>suddenly the two one-eyed beast bleeding color pattern began to emerge in the figure, two color pattern rotating ...... skeletal figure [http://www.nrcil.net/fancybox/lib/rakuten_LV_59.html ベルト ルイヴィトン] in the eyes of the beast subjective watched two grain boundary map, feel faint been confused [http://www.nrcil.net/fancybox/lib/rakuten_LV_32.html ルイヴィトン デザイナー] soul moving.<br><br>'no.'<br><br>'ah.'<br><br>'father.'<br><br>saw one plane a small space within the universe began to collapse, Fengyun origin of the universe has been almost a small devour light, natural whole small universe annihilation of all space began to collapse, and soon finished with the disappearance of origin, all Planes Space [http://www.nrcil.net/fancybox/lib/rakuten_LV_10.html ルイヴィトン カバン メンズ] foes seem like shattered glass, all creatures annihilate foes.<br><br>'circles beast, [http://www.nrcil.net/fancybox/lib/rakuten_LV_26.html 財布 メンズ ルイヴィトン] beast circles, circles beast!!!' hid a black wings with three men in the distant [http://www.nrcil.net/fancybox/lib/rakuten_LV_97.html ルイヴィトン 小物] howl of pain cries of a void, he just has a small universe
More generally, suppose that ''f''(''z'') is a meromorphic function on an [[open set]] Ω in the [[complex plane]] and that ''C'' is a closed curve in Ω which avoids all zeros and poles of ''f'' and is [[contractible space|contractible]] to a point inside Ω. For each point ''z'' ∈ Ω, let ''n''(''C'',''z'') be the [[winding number]] of ''C'' around ''z''. Then
相关的主题文章:
:<math>\oint_{C} \frac{f'(z)}{f(z)}\, dz = 2\pi i \left(\sum_a n(C,a) - \sum_b n(C,b)\right)</math>
<ul>
where the first summation is over all zeros ''a'' of ''f'' counted with their multiplicities, and the second summation is over the poles ''b'' of ''f'' counted with their orders.
 
 
  <li>[http://cgi.www5a.biglobe.ne.jp/~rebizo/uranai/keijiban/aska.cgi http://cgi.www5a.biglobe.ne.jp/~rebizo/uranai/keijiban/aska.cgi]</li>
==Interpretation of the contour integral==
 
The contour integral <math>\oint_{C} \frac{f'(z)}{f(z)}\, dz</math> can be interpreted in two ways:
  <li>[http://www.huanwang123.com/plus/feedback.php?aid=9904 http://www.huanwang123.com/plus/feedback.php?aid=9904]</li>
* as the total change in the [[argument (complex analysis)|argument]] of ''f''(''z'') as ''z'' travels around ''C'', explaining the name of the theorem; this follows from
 
:<math>\frac{d}{dz}\log(f(z))=\frac{f'(z)}{f(z)}</math>
  <li>[http://www.fcgtt.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=234074 http://www.fcgtt.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=234074]</li>
and the relation between arguments and logarithms.
 
* as 2&pi;''i'' times the winding number of the path ''f''(''C'') around the origin, using the substitution ''w'' = ''f''(''z''):
</ul>
:<math>\oint_{C} \frac{f'(z)}{f(z)}\, dz = \oint_{f(C)} \frac{1}{w}\, dw</math>
 
==Proof of the argument principle==
Let ''z''<sub>''N''</sub> be a zero of ''f''. We can write ''f''(''z'') = (''z''&nbsp;&minus;&nbsp;''z''<sub>''N''</sub>)<sup>''k''</sup>''g''(''z'') where ''k'' is the multiplicity of the zero, and thus ''g''(''z''<sub>''N''</sub>) ≠&nbsp;0. We get
 
: <math>f'(z)=k(z-z_N)^{k-1}g(z)+(z-z_N)^kg'(z)\,\!</math>
 
and
 
: <math>{f'(z)\over f(z)}={k \over z-z_N}+{g'(z)\over g(z)}.</math>
 
Since  ''g''(''z''<sub>''N''</sub>) ≠ 0, it follows that ''g' ''(''z'')/''g''(''z'') has no singularities at ''z''<sub>''N''</sub>, and thus is analytic at ''z''<sub>N</sub>, which implies that the [[Residue (complex analysis)|residue]] of ''f''&prime;(''z'')/''f''(''z'') at ''z''<sub>''N''</sub> is&nbsp;''k''.
 
Let ''z''<sub>P</sub> be a pole of ''f''. We can write ''f''(''z'') = (''z''&nbsp;&minus;&nbsp;''z''<sub>P</sub>)<sup>&minus;''m''</sup>''h''(''z'') where ''m'' is the order of the pole, and thus
''h''(''z''<sub>P</sub>) ≠ 0. Then,
 
: <math>f'(z)=-m(z-z_P)^{-m-1}h(z)+(z-z_P)^{-m}h'(z)\,\!.</math>
 
and
 
: <math>{f'(z)\over f(z)}={-m \over z-z_P}+{h'(z)\over h(z)}</math>
 
similarly as above. It follows that ''h''&prime;(''z'')/''h''(''z'') has no singularities at ''z''<sub>P</sub> since ''h''(''z''<sub>P</sub>) ≠ 0 and thus it is analytic at ''z''<sub>P</sub>. We find that the residue of
''f''&prime;(''z'')/''f''(''z'') at ''z''<sub>P</sub> is &minus;''m''.
 
Putting these together, each zero ''z''<sub>''N''</sub> of multiplicity ''k'' of ''f'' creates a simple pole for
''f''&prime;(''z'')/''f''(''z'') with the residue being ''k'', and each  pole ''z''<sub>P</sub> of order ''m'' of
''f'' creates a simple pole for ''f''&prime;(''z'')/''f''(''z'') with the residue being &minus;''m''. (Here, by a simple pole we
mean a pole of order one.) In addition, it can be shown that ''f''&prime;(''z'')/''f''(''z'') has no other poles,
and so no other residues.
 
By the [[residue theorem]] we have that the integral about ''C'' is the product of 2''πi'' and the sum of the residues.  Together, the sum of the ''k'' 's for each zero ''z''<sub>''N''</sub> is the number of zeros counting multiplicities of the zeros, and likewise for the poles, and so we have our result.
 
==Applications and consequences==
The argument principle can be used to efficiently locate zeros or poles of meromorphic functions on a computer. Even with rounding errors, the expression <math>{1\over 2\pi i}\oint_{C} {f'(z) \over f(z)}\, dz</math> will yield results close to an integer; by determining these integers for different contours ''C'' one can obtain information about the location of the zeros and poles. Numerical tests of the [[Riemann hypothesis]] use this technique to get an upper bound for the number of zeros of [[Riemann Xi function|Riemann's <math>\xi(s)</math> function]] inside a rectangle intersecting the critical line.
 
The proof of [[Rouché's theorem]] uses the argument principle.
 
Modern books on feedback control theory quite frequently use the argument principle to serve as the theoretical basis of the [[Nyquist stability criterion]].  
 
A consequence of the more general formulation of the argument principle is that, under the same hypothesis, if ''g'' is an analytic function in Ω, then
 
:<math> \frac{1}{2\pi i} \oint_C g(z)\frac{f'(z)}{f(z)}\, dz = \sum_a n(C,a)g(a) - \sum_b n(C,b)g(b).</math>
 
For example, if ''f'' is a [[polynomial]] having zeros ''z''<sub>1</sub>, ..., ''z''<sub>p</sub> inside a simple contour ''C'', and ''g''(''z'') = ''z''<sup>k</sup>, then
:<math> \frac{1}{2\pi i} \oint_C z^k\frac{f'(z)}{f(z)}\, dz = z_1^k+z_2^k+\dots+z_p^k,</math>
is [[power sum symmetric polynomial]] of the roots of ''f''.
 
Another consequence is if we compute the complex integral:
 
: <math>\oint_C f(z){g'(z) \over g(z)}\, dz</math>
 
for an appropriate choice of ''g'' and ''f'' we have the [[Abel–Plana formula]]:
 
: <math> \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}f(n)-\int_{0}^{\infty}f(x)\,dx= f(0)/2+i\int_{0}^{\infty}\frac{f(it)-f(-it)}{e^{2\pi t}-1}\, dt </math>
 
which expresses the relationship between a discrete sum and its integral.
 
==Generalized argument principle==
There is an immediate generalization of the argument principle. The integral
: <math>\oint_{C} {f'(z) \over f(z)} g(z) \, dz</math>
is equal to g evaluated at the zeroes, minues g evaluated at the poles.
 
==History==
According to the book by [[Frank Smithies]] (''Cauchy and the Creation of Complex Function Theory'', Cambridge University Press, 1997, p.177), [[Augustin-Louis Cauchy]] presented a theorem similar to the above on 27 November 1831, during his self-imposed exile in Turin (then capital of the Kingdom of Piedmont-Sardinia) away from France. However, according to this book, only zeroes were mentioned, not poles. This theorem by Cauchy was only published many years later in 1974 in a hand-written form and so is quite difficult to read. Cauchy published a paper with a discussion on both zeroes and poles in 1855, two years before his death.
 
== See also ==
 
* [[Logarithmic derivative]]
 
==References==
* {{cite book | last=Rudin | first=Walter | title = Real and Complex Analysis (International Series in Pure and Applied Mathematics) | publisher=McGraw-Hill | year=1986 |isbn=978-0-07-054234-1}}
* {{cite book | last=Ahlfors | first=Lars | title = Complex analysis: an introduction to the theory of analytic functions of one complex variable | publisher=McGraw-Hill | year=1979 |isbn=978-0-07-000657-7}}
* {{cite book | last1=Churchill | first1=Ruel Vance | last2=Brown | first2=James Ward | title = Complex Variables and Applications | publisher=McGraw-Hill | year=1989 |isbn=978-0-07-010905-6}}
* Backlund, R.-J. (1914) Sur les zéros de la fonction zeta(s) de Riemann, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 158, 1979-1982.
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Argument Principle}}
[[Category:Complex analysis]]
[[Category:Theorems in complex analysis]]

Revision as of 21:33, 22 January 2014

The simple contour C (black), the zeros of f (blue) and the poles of f (red). Here we have .

In complex analysis, the argument principle (or Cauchy's argument principle) relates the difference between the number of zeros and poles of a meromorphic function to a contour integral of the function's logarithmic derivative.

Specifically, if f(z) is a meromorphic function inside and on some closed contour C, and f has no zeros or poles on C, then

where N and P denote respectively the number of zeros and poles of f(z) inside the contour C, with each zero and pole counted as many times as its multiplicity and order, respectively, indicate. This statement of the theorem assumes that the contour C is simple, that is, without self-intersections, and that it is oriented counter-clockwise.

More generally, suppose that f(z) is a meromorphic function on an open set Ω in the complex plane and that C is a closed curve in Ω which avoids all zeros and poles of f and is contractible to a point inside Ω. For each point z ∈ Ω, let n(C,z) be the winding number of C around z. Then

where the first summation is over all zeros a of f counted with their multiplicities, and the second summation is over the poles b of f counted with their orders.

Interpretation of the contour integral

The contour integral can be interpreted in two ways:

  • as the total change in the argument of f(z) as z travels around C, explaining the name of the theorem; this follows from

and the relation between arguments and logarithms.

  • as 2πi times the winding number of the path f(C) around the origin, using the substitution w = f(z):

Proof of the argument principle

Let zN be a zero of f. We can write f(z) = (z − zN)kg(z) where k is the multiplicity of the zero, and thus g(zN) ≠ 0. We get

and

Since g(zN) ≠ 0, it follows that g' (z)/g(z) has no singularities at zN, and thus is analytic at zN, which implies that the residue of f′(z)/f(z) at zN is k.

Let zP be a pole of f. We can write f(z) = (z − zP)mh(z) where m is the order of the pole, and thus h(zP) ≠ 0. Then,

and

similarly as above. It follows that h′(z)/h(z) has no singularities at zP since h(zP) ≠ 0 and thus it is analytic at zP. We find that the residue of f′(z)/f(z) at zP is −m.

Putting these together, each zero zN of multiplicity k of f creates a simple pole for f′(z)/f(z) with the residue being k, and each pole zP of order m of f creates a simple pole for f′(z)/f(z) with the residue being −m. (Here, by a simple pole we mean a pole of order one.) In addition, it can be shown that f′(z)/f(z) has no other poles, and so no other residues.

By the residue theorem we have that the integral about C is the product of 2πi and the sum of the residues. Together, the sum of the k 's for each zero zN is the number of zeros counting multiplicities of the zeros, and likewise for the poles, and so we have our result.

Applications and consequences

The argument principle can be used to efficiently locate zeros or poles of meromorphic functions on a computer. Even with rounding errors, the expression will yield results close to an integer; by determining these integers for different contours C one can obtain information about the location of the zeros and poles. Numerical tests of the Riemann hypothesis use this technique to get an upper bound for the number of zeros of Riemann's function inside a rectangle intersecting the critical line.

The proof of Rouché's theorem uses the argument principle.

Modern books on feedback control theory quite frequently use the argument principle to serve as the theoretical basis of the Nyquist stability criterion.

A consequence of the more general formulation of the argument principle is that, under the same hypothesis, if g is an analytic function in Ω, then

For example, if f is a polynomial having zeros z1, ..., zp inside a simple contour C, and g(z) = zk, then

is power sum symmetric polynomial of the roots of f.

Another consequence is if we compute the complex integral:

for an appropriate choice of g and f we have the Abel–Plana formula:

which expresses the relationship between a discrete sum and its integral.

Generalized argument principle

There is an immediate generalization of the argument principle. The integral

is equal to g evaluated at the zeroes, minues g evaluated at the poles.

History

According to the book by Frank Smithies (Cauchy and the Creation of Complex Function Theory, Cambridge University Press, 1997, p.177), Augustin-Louis Cauchy presented a theorem similar to the above on 27 November 1831, during his self-imposed exile in Turin (then capital of the Kingdom of Piedmont-Sardinia) away from France. However, according to this book, only zeroes were mentioned, not poles. This theorem by Cauchy was only published many years later in 1974 in a hand-written form and so is quite difficult to read. Cauchy published a paper with a discussion on both zeroes and poles in 1855, two years before his death.

See also

References

  • 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  • 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  • 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  • Backlund, R.-J. (1914) Sur les zéros de la fonction zeta(s) de Riemann, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 158, 1979-1982.