Voorhoeve index: Difference between revisions

From formulasearchengine
Jump to navigation Jump to search
en>Ansukam
restored the derivative lost by the previous editor
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
While in the confusion of divorce, most parents never consider the problem of child custody beforehand. Usually communication involving the spouses has broken down and their assumptions are presumed by both parents about custody to be recognized by another parent. Often that is false. Because of this, many divorcing parents find themselves astonished and confused by the chance of child custody issues in divorce. <br><br>The greatest misconception is that the primary caretaker may be the presumed de-facto custodial parent. Therefore, most parents who take the lead role in providing for the child in marriage simply assume that the law can recognize this role giving her or him primary custody after divorce. Famous treatment, however, doesn&quot;t automatically guarantee child custody. If you have submitted for a and your ex moved ahead and received a legal order to get custody of your child the child could be legally taken away from you despite any caretaking part you might have had in your childs life. Consequently, unprepared divorcing parents usually are in a position in which they dont have the legal right-to make any important decisions regarding their daughter or son on issues including medical treatment, faith and training. <br><br>Surfaces Choose Custody <br><br>In accordance with Canadian law, until courts decide otherwise, both parents have equal rights of custody to any and all kids. Cutting through the legalese, what meaning is: obtain the courts to grant you custody only then you&quot;re safe against any table movements by your partner. In order to steer the courts, but, you need to educate yourself about Canadian custody battles to ensure that you, and perhaps not your ex, manage to persuade the courts to give custody of one&quot;s child to you. [http://www.aijinbao.com/estate-planning-and-insurance-concerns-when-you-divorce-3/ Attorney For Divorce Appleton] includes additional resources about the meaning behind it. <br><br>A Childs Most useful Interest <br><br>In Canada, as in several other places, courts concentrate on just one issue in child custody cases: they decide what in their view would be in-the childs best interests and grant custody accordingly. To learn more, you are encouraged to view at: [http://www.sell2013.com/should-you-have-an-for-a/ child custody agreement fond du lac]. That is a somewhat obscure standard as you may possibly imagine, and as a consequence it&quot;ll serve you well to understand the underlying factors which will influence a judge in reaching a decision concerning the best interest of a son or daughter. <br><br>-each parent&quot;s capability to offer the child&quot;s needs both financially and psychologically, <br><br>-the relationship each parent has with the child, <br><br>-your child&quot;s wishes, if she or he is of an age of maturity to convey to the court their wishes, <br><br>-if you&quot;ve multiple son or daughter, the court normally prefers to keep them together, <br><br>-the court will try to minimize the disturbance of the child&quot;s life (the status quo), <br><br>-who the main caregiver of the little one was through the marriage, <br><br>-time available to spend with the children (working hours, out-of town trips), <br><br>-one parent&quot;s interference with one other parent&quot;s relationship with the children, <br><br>-any special requirements of the daughter or son. <br><br>Common Presumptions of the Courts <br><br>The picture painted above shows there are a great many facets, which a court use to look for the most readily useful interest of a child. That said, however, you can find three cardinal principles that generally prevail for some courts: <br><br>1) Stay at home mother: A stay at home mom, almost always gains custody of-the son or daughter over a functional man. This presumption relies upon the fact that, especially for young children, the court wants to place children in an atmosphere where the parent is definite to be around often. <br><br>2) Established status quo: If either party has, for all useful purposes, already taken control of the daughter or son after separation but before any official declaration from the courts, the judge will typically read the existing living arrangement whilst the standard arrangement and all things being equal will uphold it. Be taught new information on [http://www.fjrenke.com/should-you-have-an-for-a-2/ Should you have an for a | Kitchen Accessories] by browsing our dazzling essay. <br><br>3) Primary caregiver: If you can establish that you&quot;ve been the primary care provider for a child then your law will typically think that you&quot;re best situated to care for the child in the future and as a result offer you custody..Derr & Villarreal, LLC<br>200 Front St. <br>Ste. 2E<br>Beaver Dam WI 53916<br>(920) 233-1994<br><br>If you treasured this article and you also would like to get more info regarding [http://www.purevolume.com/listeners/ossifieddonor5075 Childrens health] please visit our own page.
{{Orphan|date=July 2013}}
 
'''Multipole radiation''' is a theoretical framework for the description of [[electromagnetic radiation|electromagnetic]] or [[gravitational radiation|gravitational]] radiation from time-dependent distributions of distant sources. These tools are applied to physical phenomena which occur at a variety of length scales - from gravitational waves due to [[galaxy collisions]] to [[gamma radiation]] resulting from [[nuclear decay]].<ref name="hartle"/><ref name="rose"/><ref name="blatt"/> Multipole radiation is analyzed using similar [[multipole expansion]] techniques that describe fields from static sources, however there are important differences in the details of the analysis because multipole radiation fields behave quite differently from static fields. This article is primarily concerned with electromagnetic multipole radiation, although the treatment of gravitational waves is similar.
 
Electromagnetic radiation depends on structural details of the source system of [[electric charge]] and [[electric current]]. Direct analysis can be intractable if the structure is unknown or complicated. Multipole analysis offers a way to separate the radiation into moments of increasing complexity. Since the electromagnetic field depends more heavily on lower-order moments than on higher-order moments, the electromagnetic field can be approximated without knowing the structure in detail.
 
==Properties of multipole radiation==
 
===Linearity of moments===
Since [[Maxwell's equations]] are linear, the [[electric field]] and [[magnetic field]] depend linearly on source distributions. Linearity allows the fields from various multipole moments to be calculated independently and added together to give the total field of the system. This is the well-known [[superposition principle|principle of superposition]].
 
===Origin dependence of multipole moments===
Multipole moments are calculated with respect to a fixed expansion point which is taken to be the origin of a given coordinate system. Translating the origin changes the multipole moments of the system with the exception of the first non-vanishing moment.<ref name="raab"/><ref name="jackson"/> For example, the monopole moment of charge is simply the total charge in the system. Changing the origin will never change this moment. If the monopole moment is zero then the dipole moment of the system will be translation invariant. If both the monopole and dipole moments are zero then the quadrupole moment is translation invariant, and so forth. Because higher-order moments depend on the position of the origin, they cannot be regarded as invariant properties of the system.
 
===Field dependence on distance===
The field from a multipole moment depends on both the distance from the origin and the angular orientation of the evaluation point with respect to the coordinate system.<ref name="raab"/> In particular, the radial dependence of the electromagnetic field from a ''stationary'' <math>2^\ell</math>-pole scales as <math>1/r^{\ell+2}</math>.<ref name="rose"/> That is, the electric field from the [[electric charge|electric monopole]] moment scales as inverse distance squared. Likewise, the [[electric dipole]] moment creates a field that scales as inverse distance cubed, and so on. As distance increases, the contribution of high-order moments becomes much smaller than the contribution from low-order moments, so high-order moments can be ignored to simplify calculations.
 
The radial dependence of radiation waves is different from static fields because these waves carry energy away from the system. Since energy must be conserved, simple geometric analysis shows that the energy density of spherical radiation, radius <math>r</math>, must scale as <math>1/r^2</math>. As a spherical wave expands, the fixed energy of the wave must spread out over an expanding sphere of surface area <math>4 \pi r^2</math>. Accordingly, every time-dependent multipole moment must contribute radiant energy density that scales as <math>1/r^2</math>, regardless of the order of the moment. Hence, high-order moments cannot be discarded as easily as in static case. Even so, the multipole coefficients of a system generally diminish with increasing order, usually as <math>1/(2\ell+1)!!</math>, so radiation fields can still be approximated by truncating high-order moments.<ref name="jackson"/>
 
==Time-dependent electromagnetic fields==
 
===Sources===
Time-dependent source distributions can be expressed using [[Fourier analysis]]. This allows separate frequencies to be analyzed independently. Charge density is given by
:<math>\rho(\mathbf{x},t) = \int_{-\infty}^\infty \hat{\rho}(\mathbf{x},\omega) e^{-i \omega t}</math>
and current density by
:<math>\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x},t) = \int_{-\infty}^\infty \hat{\mathbf{J}}(\mathbf{x},\omega) e^{-i \omega t}</math>.<ref name="hafner"/>
For convenience, only a single angular frequency ω is considered from this point forward; thus
:<math>\rho(\mathbf{x},t) = \rho(\mathbf{x}) e^{-i \omega t}</math>
:<math>\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x},t) = \mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x}) e^{-i \omega t}</math>
The [[superposition principle]] may be applied to generalize results for multiple frequencies.<ref name="jackson"/> Vector quantities appear in bold. The standard convention of taking the real part of complex quantities to represent physical quantities is used.
 
It should be noted that the intrinsic angular momentum of elementary particles (see [[Spin (physics)]]) may also affect electromagnetic radiation from some source materials. To account for these effects, the intrinsic magnetization of the system <math>\mathbf{M}(\mathbf{x},t)</math> would have to be taken into account. For simplicity however, these effects will be deferred to the discussion of generalized multipole radiation.
 
===Potentials===
The source distributions can be integrated to yield the time-dependent [[electric potential]] and [[magnetic potential]] φ and '''A''' respectively. Formulas are expressed in the [[Lorenz Gauge]] in [[SI units]].<ref name="jackson"/><ref name="hafner"/>
 
:<math>\phi(\mathbf{x},t)=\frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0}\int d^3\mathbf{x'}\int dt'\frac{\rho(\mathbf{x'},t')}{\|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x'}\|_2}\delta\left(t'-(t-\frac{\|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x'}\|_2}{c})\right)</math>
:<math>\mathbf{A}(\mathbf{x},t)=\frac{\mu_0}{4 \pi}\int d^3\mathbf{x'}\int dt'\frac{\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x'},t')}{\|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x'}\|_2}\delta\left(t'-(t-\frac{\|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x'}\|_2}{c})\right)</math>
 
In these formulas ''c'' is the speed of light in vacuum, <math>\delta</math> is the [[Dirac delta function]], and <math>\|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x'}\|_2</math> is the [[Euclidean distance]] from the source point '''x&prime;''' to the evaluation point '''x'''. Integrating the time-dependent source distributions above yields
 
:<math>\phi(\mathbf{x},t) =  \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} e^{-i \omega t} \int d^3\mathbf{x'}\rho(\mathbf{x'})\frac{e^{i k \|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x'}\|_2}}{\|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x'}\|_2}</math>
:<math>\mathbf{A}(\mathbf{x},t) =  \frac{\mu_0}{4 \pi} e^{-i \omega t} \int d^3\mathbf{x'}\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x'})\frac{e^{i k \|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x'}\|_2}}{\|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x'}\|_2}</math>
 
where ''k''=ω/''c''. These formulas provide the basis for analyzing multipole radiation.
 
===Multipole expansion in near field===
The near field is the region around a source where the electromagnetic field can be evaluated quasi-statically. If target distance from the multipole origin <math>r=\|\mathbf{x}\|_2</math> is much smaller than the radiation wavelength <math>\lambda=2\pi/k</math>, then <math>k r\ll 1</math>. As a result, the exponential can be approximated in this region as:
 
:<math>e^{i k \|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x'}\|_2} = 1 + O(k r)</math>
 
See [[Taylor expansion]]. By using this approximation, the remaining '''x'''&prime; dependence is the same as it is for a static system, the same analysis applies.<ref name="raab"/><ref name="jackson"/> Essentially, the potentials can be evaluated in the near field at a given instant by simply taking a snapshot of the system and treating it as though it were static - hence it is called quasi-static.<ref name="jackson"/> See [[near and far field]] and [[multipole expansion]]. In particular, the inverse distance <math>1/\|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x'}\|_2</math> is expanded using [[spherical harmonics]] which are integrated separately to obtain spherical multipole coefficients.
 
===Multipole expansion in far field: Multipole radiation===
At large distances from a high frequency source, <math>\lambda\ll r</math>, the following approximations hold:
 
:<math>\frac{1}{\|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x'}\|_2} = \frac{1}{r} + O(1/r^2)</math>
:<math>e^{i k \|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x'}\|_2}=e^{i k (r - \mathbf{n}\cdot\mathbf{x'} + O(1/r))}=e^{i k r - i k \mathbf{n}\cdot\mathbf{x'}}(1 + O(1/r))</math>
 
Since only the first-order term in <math>1/r</math> is significant at large distances, the expansions combine to give
:<math>\frac{e^{i k \|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x'}\|_2}}{\|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x'}\|_2}=\frac{e^{i k r}}{r}(1 - i k(\mathbf{n}\cdot\mathbf{x'}) + \frac{(-i k)^2}{2}(\mathbf{n}\cdot\mathbf{x'})^2 + ...) + O(1/r^2)</math>
 
Each power of <math>\mathbf{n}\cdot\mathbf{x'}</math> corresponds to a different multipole moment. The first few moments are evaluated directly below.
 
==Electric monopole radiation, nonexistence==
The zeroth order term, <math>\frac{e^{i k \|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x'}\|_2}}{\|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x'}\|_2} \rightarrow \frac{e^{i k r}}{r}</math>, applied to the scalar potential gives
:<math>\phi_{\text{Electric monopole}}(\mathbf{x},t) =  \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{e^{i k r - i \omega t}}{r} \int d^3\mathbf{x'}\rho(\mathbf{x'})=\frac{e^{i k r - i \omega t}}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 r} q</math>
where the total charge <math>q=\int d^3\mathbf{x'}\rho(\mathbf{x'})</math> is the electric monopole moment oscillating at frequency ω. [[Conservation of charge]] requires ''q''=0 since
 
:<math>q(t)=\int d^3\mathbf{x'}\rho(\mathbf{x'},t)=\int d^3\mathbf{x'}\rho(\mathbf{x'})e^{-i \omega t}=q e^{-i \omega t}</math>.
 
If the system is closed then the total charge cannot fluctuate which means the oscillation amplitude ''q'' must be zero. Hence, <math>\phi_{\text{Electric monopole}}(\mathbf{x},t) = 0</math>. The corresponding fields and radiant power must also be zero.<ref name="jackson"/>
 
==Electric dipole radiation==
 
===Electric dipole potential===
Electric dipole radiation can be derived by applying the zeroth-order term to the vector potential.<ref name="jackson"/>
 
:<math>\mathbf{A}_{\text{Electric dipole}}(\mathbf{x},t) =  \frac{\mu_0}{4 \pi} \frac{e^{i k r - i \omega t}}{r} \int d^3\mathbf{x'}\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x'})</math>
 
[[Integration by parts]] yields
 
:<math>\int d^3\mathbf{x'}\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x'})=-\int d^3\mathbf{x'} \mathbf{x'}(\mathbf{\nabla}\cdot\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x'}))</math>.
 
and the charge [[continuity equation]] shows
 
:<math>\frac{\partial\rho(\mathbf{x},t)}{\partial t} + \mathbf{\nabla}\cdot\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x},t)=\left(-i\omega\rho(\mathbf{x}) + \mathbf{\nabla}\cdot\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x})\right)e^{-i \omega t}=0</math>.
 
It follows that
 
:<math>\mathbf{A}_{\text{Electric dipole}}(\mathbf{x},t) = \frac{-i \omega \mu_0}{4 \pi} \frac{e^{i k r - i \omega t}}{r} \int d^3\mathbf{x'}\mathbf{x'}\rho(\mathbf{x'})</math>
 
Similar results can be obtained by applying the first-order term, <math>\frac{e^{i k \|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x'}\|_2}}{\|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x'}\|_2} \rightarrow \frac{e^{i k r}}{r}(-i k)(\mathbf{n}\cdot\mathbf{x'})</math> to the scalar potential. The amplitude of the electric dipole moment of the system is <math>\mathbf{p}=\int d^3\mathbf{x'}\mathbf{x'}\rho(\mathbf{x'})</math>, which allows the potentials to be expressed as
 
:<math>\rho_{\text{Electric dipole}}(\mathbf{x},t) = \frac{-i k}{4 \pi \epsilon_0}\frac{e^{i k r - i \omega t}}{r}\mathbf{n}\cdot\mathbf{p}</math>
:<math>\mathbf{A}_{\text{Electric dipole}}(\mathbf{x},t) =\frac{-i\omega\mu_0}{4 \pi} \frac{e^{i k r - i \omega t}}{r} \mathbf{p}</math>
 
===Electric dipole fields===
Once the time-dependent potentials are understood, the time-dependent [[electric field]] and [[magnetic field]] can be calculated in the usual way. Namely,
 
:<math>\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{x},t)=-\mathbf{\nabla}\phi(\mathbf{x},t)-\frac{\partial\mathbf{A}(\mathbf{x},t)}{\partial t}</math>
:<math>\mathbf{B}(\mathbf{x},t)=\mathbf{\nabla}\times\mathbf{A}(\mathbf{x},t)</math>,
 
or, in a source-free region of space, the relationship between the magnetic field and the electric field can be used to obtain
 
:<math>\mathbf{H}(\mathbf{x},t)=\frac{1}{\mu_0}\mathbf{\nabla}\times\mathbf{A}(\mathbf{x},t)</math>
:<math>\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{x},t)=\frac{i Z_0}{k}\mathbf{\nabla}\times\mathbf{H}(\mathbf{x},t)</math>
 
where <math>Z_0=\sqrt{\mu_0/\epsilon_0}</math> is the [[impedance of free space]]. The electric and magnetic fields that correspond to the potentials above are
 
:<math>\mathbf{H}_{\text{Electric dipole}}(\mathbf{x},t)=\frac{c k^2}{4 \pi}(\mathbf{n}\times\mathbf{p})\frac{e^{i k r - i \omega t}}{r}</math>
:<math>\mathbf{E}_{\text{Electric dipole}}(\mathbf{x},t)=Z_0(\mathbf{H}_{\text{Electric dipole}}\times\mathbf{n})</math>
 
which is consistent with spherical radiation waves.<ref name="jackson"/>
 
===Pure electric dipole power===
The power density, energy per unit area per unit time, is expressed by the [[Poynting vector]] <math>\mathbf{S}=\mathbf{E}\times\mathbf{H}</math>. It follows that the time averaged power density per unit [[solid angle]] is given by
 
:<math>\frac{dP(\mathbf{x})}{d\Omega}=\frac{r^2}{2}\Re(\mathbf{n}\cdot\mathbf{E}\times\mathbf{H})</math>.
 
The dot product with <math>\mathbf{n}</math> extracts the emission magnitude and the factor of 1/2 comes from averaging over time. As explained above, the <math>r^2</math> cancels the radial dependence of radiation energy density. Application to a pure electric dipole gives
 
:<math>\frac{dP_{\text{Electric dipole}}(\mathbf{x})}{d\Omega}=\frac{c^2 Z_0}{32 \pi^2}k^4\|\mathbf{p}\|_2^2\sin^2\theta</math>
 
where θ is measured with respect to <math>\mathbf{p}</math>.<ref name="jackson"/> Integration over a sphere yields the total power radiated:
 
:<math>P_{\text{Electric dipole}}=\frac{c^2 Z_0}{12 \pi}k^4\|\mathbf{p}\|_2^2</math>
 
==Magnetic dipole radiation==
 
===Magnetic dipole potential===
The first-order term, <math>\frac{e^{i k \|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x'}\|_2}}{\|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{x'}\|_2} \rightarrow \frac{e^{i k r}}{r}(-i k)(\mathbf{n}\cdot\mathbf{x'})</math>, applied to the vector potential gives magnetic dipole radiation and electric quadrupole radiation.<ref name="jackson"/>
 
:<math>\mathbf{A}_{\text{Magnetic dipole / Electric quadrupole}}(\mathbf{x},t) =  \frac{\mu_0}{4 \pi} \frac{e^{i k r - i \omega t}}{r}(-i k)\int d^3\mathbf{x'}(\mathbf{n}\cdot\mathbf{x'})\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x'})</math>
 
The integrand can be separated into symmetric and anti-symmetric parts in '''n''' and '''x'''&prime;
 
:<math>(\mathbf{n}\cdot\mathbf{x'})\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x'})=\frac{1}{2}\left((\mathbf{n}\cdot\mathbf{x'})\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x'})+(\mathbf{n}\cdot\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x'}))\mathbf{x'}\right)+\frac{1}{2}(\mathbf{x'}\times\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x'}))\times\mathbf{n}</math>
 
The second term contains the effective magnetization due to the current <math>\mathbf{M}_{\text{effective}}(\mathbf{x'})=1/2(\mathbf{x'}\times\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x'}))</math> and integration gives the magnetic dipole moment.
 
:<math>\int d^3\mathbf{x'}\mathbf{M}_{\text{effective}}(\mathbf{x'}) = \mathbf{m}</math>
:<math>\mathbf{A}_{\text{Magnetic dipole}}(\mathbf{x},t) = \frac{-i k \mu_0}{4 \pi} \frac{e^{i k r - i \omega t}}{r}\mathbf{m}\times\mathbf{n}</math>
 
Notice that <math>\mathbf{A}_{\text{Magnetic dipole}}</math> has a similar form to <math>\mathbf{H}_{\text{Electric dipole}}</math>. That means the magnetic field from a magnetic dipole behaves similarly to the electric field from an electric dipole. Likewise, the electric field from a magnetic dipole behaves like the magnetic field from an electric dipole. Taking the transformations
 
:<math>\mathbf{E}_{\text{Electric dipole}} \rightarrow Z_0\mathbf{H}_{\text{Magnetic dipole}}</math>
:<math>\mathbf{H}_{\text{Electric dipole}} \rightarrow \frac{-1}{Z_0}\mathbf{E}_{\text{Magnetic dipole}}</math>
:<math>\mathbf{p} \rightarrow \mathbf{m}/c</math>
 
on previous results yields magnetic dipole results.<ref name="jackson"/>
 
===Magnetic dipole fields===
:<math>\mathbf{E}_{\text{Magnetic dipole}}(\mathbf{x},t)=\frac{-k^2 Z_0}{4 \pi}(\mathbf{n}\times\mathbf{m})\frac{e^{i k r - i \omega t}}{r}</math>
:<math>\mathbf{H}_{\text{Magnetic dipole}}(\mathbf{x},t)=\frac{-1}{Z_0}(\mathbf{E}_{\text{Magnetic dipole}}\times\mathbf{n})</math><ref name="jackson"/>
 
===Pure magnetic dipole power===
The average power radiated per unit solid angle by a magnetic dipole is
 
:<math>\frac{dP_{\text{Magnetic dipole}}(\mathbf{x})}{d\Omega}=\frac{Z_0}{32 \pi^2}k^4\|\mathbf{m}\|_2^2\sin^2\theta</math>
 
where θ is measured with respect to the magnetic dipole <math>\mathbf{m}</math>. The total power radiated is:
 
:<math>P_{\text{Magnetic dipole}}=\frac{Z_0}{12 \pi}k^4\|\mathbf{m}\|_2^2</math><ref name="jackson"/>
 
==Electric quadrupole radiation==
 
===Electric quadrupole potential===
The symmetric portion of the integrand from the previous section can be resolved by applying [[integration by parts]] and the charge [[continuity equation]] as was done for electric dipole radiation.
 
:<math>\frac{1}{2} \int d^3\mathbf{x}\left((\mathbf{n}\cdot\mathbf{x'})\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x'})+(\mathbf{n}\cdot\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x'}))\mathbf{x'}\right)=\frac{-i \omega}{2} \int d^3\mathbf{x'} \mathbf{x'} (\mathbf{n}\cdot\mathbf{x'})\rho(\mathbf{x'})</math>
 
:<math>\mathbf{A}_{\text{Electric quadrupole}}(\mathbf{x},t) = \frac{-k \omega \mu_0}{8 \pi} \frac{e^{i k r - i \omega t}}{r}\int d^3\mathbf{x'} \mathbf{x'} (\mathbf{n}\cdot\mathbf{x'})\rho(\mathbf{x'})</math>
 
This corresponds to the traceless electric [[quadrupole]] moment tensor <math>Q_{\alpha \beta}=\int d^3\mathbf{x'}(3 x'_\alpha x'_\beta - \|\mathbf{x'}\|_2^2 \delta_{\alpha \beta})</math>. Contracting the second index with the normal vector <math>[Q(\mathbf{n})]_\alpha = \sum_\beta Q_{\alpha \beta} n_\beta</math> allows the vector potential to be expressed as
 
:<math>\mathbf{A}_{\text{Electric quadrupole}}(\mathbf{x},t) =  \frac{-k \omega \mu_0}{8 \pi} \frac{e^{i k r - i \omega t}}{r}\frac{1}{3}\mathbf{Q(n)}</math><ref name="jackson"/>
 
===Electric quadrupole fields===
The resulting magnetic and electric fields are:
 
:<math>\mathbf{H}_{\text{Electric quadrupole}}(\mathbf{x},t) =  \frac{-i c k^3}{24 \pi} \frac{e^{i k r - i \omega t}}{r}\mathbf{n}\times\mathbf{Q(n)}</math>
:<math>\mathbf{E}_{\text{Electric quadrupole}}(\mathbf{x},t)=Z_0(\mathbf{H}_{\text{Electric quadrupole}}\times\mathbf{n})</math><ref name="jackson"/>
 
===Pure electric quadrupole power===
The average power radiated per unit solid angle by an electric quadrupole is
 
:<math>\frac{dP_{\text{Electric quadrupole}}(\mathbf{x})}{d\Omega}=\frac{c^2 Z_0}{1152 \pi^2}k^6\|(\mathbf{n}\times\mathbf{Q(n)})\times\mathbf{n}\|_2^2</math>
 
where θ is measured with respect to the magnetic dipole <math>\mathbf{m}</math>. The total power radiated is:
 
:<math>P_{\text{Electric quadrupole}}=\frac{c^2 Z_0}{1440 \pi}k^6\sum_{\alpha, \beta} Q_{\alpha \beta}^2</math><ref name="jackson"/>
 
==Generalized multipole radiation==
As the multipole moment of a source distribution increases, the direct calculations employed so far become too cumbersome to continue. Analysis of higher moments requires more general theoretical machinery. Just as before, a single source frequency <math>\omega</math> is considered. Hence the charge, current, and intrinsic magnetization densities are given by
 
:<math>\rho(\mathbf{x},t)=\rho(\mathbf{x})e^{-i \omega t}</math>
:<math>\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x},t)=\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x})e^{-i \omega t}</math>
:<math>\mathbf{M}(\mathbf{x},t)=\mathbf{M}(\mathbf{x})e^{-i \omega t}</math>
 
respectively. The resulting electric and magnetic fields share the same time-dependence as the sources.
 
:<math>\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{x},t)=\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{x})e^{-i \omega t}</math>
:<math>\mathbf{H}(\mathbf{x},t)=\mathbf{H}(\mathbf{x})e^{-i \omega t}</math>
 
Using these definitions and the continuity equation allows Maxwell's equations to be written as
 
:<math>\mathbf{\nabla}\cdot\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{x})=-\frac{i Z_0}{k}\mathbf{\nabla}\cdot\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x})</math>
:<math>\mathbf{\nabla}\cdot\mathbf{H}(\mathbf{x})=-\mathbf{\nabla}\cdot\mathbf{M}(\mathbf{x})</math>
:<math>\mathbf{\nabla}\times\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{x})=ikZ_0\left(\mathbf{H}(\mathbf{x})+\mathbf{M}(\mathbf{x})\right)</math>
:<math>\mathbf{\nabla}\times\mathbf{H}(\mathbf{x})=-\frac{ik}{Z_0}\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{x})+\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x})</math>
 
These equations can be combined by taking the curl of the last equations and applying the identity <math>\mathbf{\nabla}\times(\mathbf{\nabla}\times\mathbf{V})=\mathbf{\nabla}(\mathbf{\nabla}\cdot\mathbf{V})-\mathbf{\nabla}^2\mathbf{V}</math>. This gives the vector forms of the non-homogeneous Helmholz equation.
 
:<math>(\nabla^2+k^2)\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{x})=-\left[ikZ_0\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x})+ikZ_0\mathbf{\nabla}\times\mathbf{M}(\mathbf{x}))+\frac{iZ_0}{k}\mathbf{\nabla}(\mathbf{\nabla}\cdot\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x}))\right]</math>
:<math>(\nabla^2+k^2)\mathbf{H}(\mathbf{x})=-\left[k^2\mathbf{M}(\mathbf{x})+\mathbf{\nabla}\times\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x})+\mathbf{\nabla}(\mathbf{\nabla}\cdot\mathbf{M}(\mathbf{x}))\right]</math>
 
===Solutions of the wave equation===
The homogeneous wave equations that describes electromagnetic radiation with frequency <math>\omega</math> in a source-free region have the form.
 
:<math>(\mathbf{\nabla}^2+k^2)\mathbf{\Psi}(\mathbf{x})=0</math>
 
The wave function <math>\mathbf{\Psi}(\mathbf{x})</math> can be expressed as a sum of [[vector spherical harmonics]]
 
:<math>\mathbf{\Psi}(\mathbf{x})=\sum_{\ell=0}^\infty \sum_{m=-\ell}^\ell f_{\ell m}(k r)\mathbf{X}_{\ell m}(\theta, \phi)</math>
:<math>f_{\ell m}(k r)=A_{\ell m}^{(1)} h_\ell^{(1)}(k r) + A_{\ell m}^{(2)} h_\ell^{(2)}(k r)</math>
 
Where <math>\mathbf{X}_{\ell m}(\theta,\phi)=\mathbf{L}Y_{\ell m}(\theta,\phi)/\sqrt{\ell(\ell+1)}</math> are the normalized vector spherical harmonics and <math>h_\ell^{(1)}</math> and <math>h_\ell^{(2)}</math> are spherical Hankel functions. See [[spherical Bessel functions]]. The differential operator <math>\mathbf{L}=-i\mathbf{x}\times\mathbf{\nabla}</math> is the angular momentum operator with the property <math>L^2 Y_{\ell m}=\ell(\ell+1) Y_{\ell m}</math>. The coefficients <math>A_{\ell m}^{(1)}</math> and <math>A_{\ell m}^{(2)}</math> correspond to expanding and contracting waves respectively. So <math>A_{\ell m}^{(2)}=0</math> for radiation. To determine the other coefficients, the [[Green's function]] for the wave equation is applied. If the source equation is
 
:<math>(\mathbf{\nabla}^2+k^2)\mathbf{\Psi}(\mathbf{x})=-\mathbf{V}(\mathbf{x})</math>
 
then the solution is:
 
:<math>\Psi_\alpha(\mathbf{x})=\sum_\beta \int d^3\mathbf{x'} G_{\alpha \beta}(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x'}) V_\beta(\mathbf{x'})</math>
 
The Green function can be expressed in vector spherical harmonics.
 
:<math>G_{\alpha \beta}(\mathbf{x},\mathbf{x'})=\sum_{\ell=0}^\infty \sum_{m=-\ell}^\ell i k h_\ell^{(1)}(kr) j_\ell(kr') X_{\ell m \alpha}(\theta,\phi) X_{\ell m \beta}^*(\theta',\phi')</math>
 
Note that <math>\mathbf{X}_{\ell m}^*=Y_{\ell m}^*\mathbf{L}/\sqrt{\ell(\ell+1)}</math> is a differential operator that acts on the source function <math>\mathbf{V}</math>. Thus, the solution to the wave equation is:
 
:<math>\mathbf{\Psi}(\mathbf{x})= \sum_{\ell=0}^\infty \sum_{m=-\ell}^\ell \frac{i k}{\sqrt{\ell(\ell+1)}} h_\ell^{(1)}(kr) \mathbf{X}_{\ell m}(\theta,\phi) \int d^3\mathbf{x'} j_\ell(kr') Y_{\ell m}^*(\theta', \phi') \mathbf{L'}\cdot\mathbf{V}(\mathbf{x'})</math>
 
===Electric multipole fields===
Applying the above solution to the electric multipole wave equation
 
:<math>(\nabla^2+k^2)\mathbf{H}(\mathbf{x})=-\left[k^2\mathbf{M}(\mathbf{x})+\mathbf{\nabla}\times\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x})+\mathbf{\nabla}(\mathbf{\nabla}\cdot\mathbf{M}(\mathbf{x}))\right]</math>
 
gives the solution for the magnetic field:<ref name="jackson"/>
 
:<math>\mathbf{H}^{(E)}(\mathbf{x})=\sum_{\ell=0}^\infty \sum_{m=-\ell}^\ell a_{\ell m}^{(E)} h_\ell^{(1)}(kr) \mathbf{X}_{\ell m}(\theta, \phi)</math>
:<math>a_{\ell m}^{(E)}=\frac{i k}{\sqrt{\ell(\ell+1)}} \int d^3\mathbf{x'} j_\ell(kr') Y_{\ell m}^*(\theta', \phi') \mathbf{L'}\cdot\left[k^2\mathbf{M}(\mathbf{x'})+\mathbf{\nabla'}\times\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x'})+\mathbf{\nabla'}(\mathbf{\nabla'}\cdot\mathbf{M}(\mathbf{x'}))\right]</math>
 
The electric field is:
 
:<math>\mathbf{E}^{(E)}(\mathbf{x})=\frac{iZ_0}{k}\mathbf{\nabla}\times\mathbf{H}^{(E)}(\mathbf{x})</math>
 
The forumula can be simplified by applying the identities
 
:<math>\mathbf{L}\cdot\mathbf{V}(\mathbf{x})=i\mathbf{\nabla}\cdot(\mathbf{x}\times\mathbf{V}(\mathbf{x}))</math>
:<math>\mathbf{L}\cdot(\mathbf{\nabla}\times\mathbf{V}(\mathbf{x}))=i\nabla^2(\mathbf{x}\cdot\mathbf{V}(\mathbf{x}))-\frac{i\partial}{r\partial r}(r^2\mathbf{\nabla}\cdot\mathbf{V}(\mathbf{x}))</math>
:<math>\mathbf{L}\cdot\mathbf{\nabla}s(\mathbf{x})=0</math>
 
to the integrand, which results in<ref name="jackson"/>
 
:<math>a_{\ell m}^{(E)}=\frac{-ik^2}{\sqrt{\ell(\ell+1)}} \int d^3\mathbf{x'} j_\ell(kr') Y_{\ell m}^*(\theta', \phi') \left[-ik\mathbf{\nabla}\cdot(\mathbf{x'}\times\mathbf{M}(\mathbf{x'}))-\frac{i}{k}\nabla^2(\mathbf{x'}\cdot\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x'}))-\frac{c\partial}{r'\partial r'}(r'^2\rho(\mathbf{x'}))\right]</math>
 
[[Green's theorem]] and [[integration by parts]] manipulates the formula into
 
:<math>a_{\ell m}^{(E)}=\frac{-ik^2}{\sqrt{\ell(\ell+1)}} \int d^3\mathbf{x'} j_\ell(kr') Y_{\ell m}^*(\theta', \phi') \left[-ik\mathbf{\nabla}\cdot(\mathbf{x'}\times\mathbf{M}(\mathbf{x'}))+ik\mathbf{x'}\cdot\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x'})\right] + c Y_{\ell m}^*(\theta', \phi')\rho(\mathbf{x'})\frac{\partial}{\partial r'}(r' j_\ell(kr'))</math>
 
The [[spherical bessel function]] <math>j_\ell(kr')</math> can also be simplified by assuming that the radiation length scale is much larger than the source length scale, which is true for most antennas.
 
:<math>j_\ell(kr')=\frac{(kr')^\ell}{(2\ell+1)!!}+O((kr')^{\ell+2})</math>
 
Retaining only the lowest order terms results in the simplified form for the electric multipole coefficients:<ref name="jackson"/>
 
:<math>a_{\ell m}^{(E)}=\frac{-ick^{\ell+2}}{(2\ell+1)!!}\left(\frac{\ell+1}{\ell}\right)^{1/2}[Q_{\ell m}+Q_{\ell m}']</math>
:<math>Q_{\ell m}=\int d^3\mathbf{x'} r'^\ell Y_{\ell m}^*(\theta', \phi')\rho(\mathbf{x'})</math>
:<math>Q_{\ell m}'=-\frac{ik}{c(\ell+1)}\int d^3\mathbf{x'} r'^\ell Y_{\ell m}^*(\theta', \phi') \mathbf{\nabla}\cdot(\mathbf{x'}\times\mathbf{M}(\mathbf{x'}))</math>
 
<math>Q_{\ell m}</math> is the same as the electric multipole moment in the static case if it were applied to the static charge distribution <math>\rho(\mathbf{x})</math> whereas <math>Q_{\ell m}'</math> corresponds to an induced electric multipole moment from the intrinsic magnetization of the source material.
 
===Magnetic multipole fields===
Applying the above solution to the magnetic multipole wave equation
 
:<math>(\nabla^2+k^2)\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{x})=-\left[ikZ_0\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x})+ikZ_0\mathbf{\nabla}\times\mathbf{M}(\mathbf{x}))+\frac{iZ_0}{k}\mathbf{\nabla}(\mathbf{\nabla}\cdot\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x}))\right]</math>
 
gives the solution for the electric field:<ref name="jackson"/>
 
:<math>\mathbf{E}^{(M)}(\mathbf{x})=\sum_{\ell=0}^\infty \sum_{m=-\ell}^\ell a_{\ell m}^{(M)} h_\ell^{(1)}(kr) \mathbf{X}_{\ell m}(\theta, \phi)</math>
:<math>a_{\ell m}^{(M)}=\frac{i k}{\sqrt{\ell(\ell+1)}} \int d^3\mathbf{x'} j_\ell(kr') Y_{\ell m}^*(\theta', \phi') \mathbf{L'}\cdot\left[ikZ_0\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x})+ikZ_0\mathbf{\nabla}\times\mathbf{M}(\mathbf{x}))+\frac{iZ_0}{k}\mathbf{\nabla}(\mathbf{\nabla}\cdot\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x}))\right]</math>
 
The magnetic field is:
 
:<math>\mathbf{H}^{(M)}(\mathbf{x})=-\frac{i}{kZ_0}\mathbf{\nabla}\times\mathbf{E}^{(M)}(\mathbf{x})</math>
 
As before, the forumula simplifies to:
 
:<math>a_{\ell m}^{(M)}=\frac{-ik^2}{\sqrt{\ell(\ell+1)}} \int d^3\mathbf{x'} j_\ell(kr') Y_{\ell m}^*(\theta', \phi') \left[\mathbf{\nabla}\cdot(\mathbf{x'}\times\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x'}))-k^2\mathbf{x'}\cdot\mathbf{M}(\mathbf{x'})\right] + Y_{\ell m}^*(\theta', \phi')\mathbf{\nabla}\cdot\mathbf{M}(\mathbf{x'})\frac{\partial}{\partial r'}(r' j_\ell(kr'))</math>
 
Retaining only the lowest order terms results in the simplified form for the magnetic multipole coefficients:<ref name="jackson"/>
 
:<math>a_{\ell m}^{(M)}=\frac{-ik^{\ell+2}}{(2\ell+1)!!}\left(\frac{\ell+1}{\ell}\right)^{1/2}[M_{\ell m}+M_{\ell m}']</math>
:<math>M_{\ell m}=\frac{1}{\ell+1}\int d^3\mathbf{x'} r'^\ell Y_{\ell m}^*(\theta', \phi') \mathbf{\nabla}\cdot(\mathbf{x'}\times\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x'}))</math>
:<math>M_{\ell m}'=\int d^3\mathbf{x'} r'^\ell Y_{\ell m}^*(\theta', \phi')\mathbf{\nabla}\cdot\mathbf{M}(\mathbf{x'})</math>
 
<math>M_{\ell m}</math> is the magnetic multipole moment from the effective magnetization <math>\mathbf{x}\times\mathbf{J}(\mathbf{x})/2</math> while <math>M_{\ell m}'</math> corresponds to the intrinsic magnetization <math>\mathbf{M}(\mathbf{x})</math>.
 
===General solution===
The electric and magnetic multipole fields combine to give the total fields:<ref name=jackson/> 
:<math>\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{x},t)=\Re\left(\sum_{\ell=0}^\infty \sum_{m=-\ell}^\ell \left[a_{\ell m}^{(M)} h_\ell^{(1)}(kr) \mathbf{X}_{\ell m}(\theta, \phi)+\frac{iZ_0}{k}a_{\ell m}^{(E)}\mathbf{\nabla}\times(h_\ell^{(1)}(kr)\mathbf{X}_{\ell m}(\theta, \phi))\right]e^{-i\omega t}\right)</math>
:<math>\mathbf{H}(\mathbf{x},t)=\Re\left(\sum_{\ell=0}^\infty \sum_{m=-\ell}^\ell \left[a_{\ell m}^{(E)} h_\ell^{(1)}(kr) \mathbf{X}_{\ell m}(\theta, \phi)-\frac{i}{kZ_0}a_{\ell m}^{(M)}\mathbf{\nabla}\times(h_\ell^{(1)}(kr)\mathbf{X}_{\ell m}(\theta, \phi))\right]e^{-i\omega t}\right)</math>
 
Note that the radial function <math>h_\ell^{(1)}(kr)</math> can be simplified in the far field limit <math>1/r \ll 1</math>.
 
:<math>h_\ell^{(1)}(kr)=(-i)^{\ell+1}\frac{e^{i k r}}{k r}+O(1/r^2)</math>
 
Thus the radial dependence of radiation is recovered.
 
==See also==
* [[Multipole expansion]]
* [[Spherical harmonics]]
* [[Vector spherical harmonics]]
* [[Near and far field]]
 
== References ==
<ref name="hartle">
{{cite book
| last = Hartle | first = James B.
| year = 2003
| title = Gravity: An Introduction to Einstein's General Relativity
| url = http://books.google.com/books?id=azZmQgAACAAJ&printsec=frontcover
| publisher = [[Addison-Wesley]]
| isbn = 0-8053-8662-9
}}</ref>
<ref name="rose">
{{cite book
| last = Rose | first = M. E.
| year = 1955
| title = Multipole Fields
| url = http://books.google.com/books?id=lBxRAAAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover
| publisher = [[John Wiley & Sons]]
}}</ref>
<ref name="blatt">
{{cite book
| last1 = Blatt | first1 = John M.
| last2 = Weisskopf | first2 = Victor F.
| year = 1963
| title = Theoretical Nuclear Physics - Seventh Printing
| url = http://books.google.com/books?id=R3BzWYQqNGsC&printsec=frontcover
| publisher = [[John Wiley & Sons]]
| isbn = 0-471-30932-X
}}</ref>
<ref name="raab">
{{cite book
| last1 = Raab | first1 = Roger E.
| last2 = de Lange | first2 = Owen L.
| year = 2004
| title = Multipole Theory in Electromagnetism
| url = http://books.google.com/books?id=V4lO6gBY6SgC&printsec=frontcover
| publisher = [[Oxford University Press]]
| isbn = 978-0-19-856727-1
}}</ref>
<ref name="jackson">
{{cite book
| last = Jackson | first = John David
| year= 1999
| title = Classical Electrodynamics - Third Edition
| url = http://books.google.com/books?id=U3LBQgAACAAJ&printsec=frontcover
| publisher = [[John Wiley & Sons]]
| isbn = 0-471-30932-X
}}</ref>
<ref name="hafner">
{{cite book
| last = Hafner | first = Christian
| year = 1990
| title = The Generalized Multipole Technique for Computational Electromagnetics
| url = http://books.google.com/books?id=Vi0bAQAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover
| publisher = [[Artech House]]
| isbn = 0-89006-429-6
}}</ref>
 
{{Reflist}}
 
<!--- Categories --->
 
[[Category:Electromagnetic radiation]]

Latest revision as of 19:40, 21 December 2013

Template:Orphan

Multipole radiation is a theoretical framework for the description of electromagnetic or gravitational radiation from time-dependent distributions of distant sources. These tools are applied to physical phenomena which occur at a variety of length scales - from gravitational waves due to galaxy collisions to gamma radiation resulting from nuclear decay.[1][2][3] Multipole radiation is analyzed using similar multipole expansion techniques that describe fields from static sources, however there are important differences in the details of the analysis because multipole radiation fields behave quite differently from static fields. This article is primarily concerned with electromagnetic multipole radiation, although the treatment of gravitational waves is similar.

Electromagnetic radiation depends on structural details of the source system of electric charge and electric current. Direct analysis can be intractable if the structure is unknown or complicated. Multipole analysis offers a way to separate the radiation into moments of increasing complexity. Since the electromagnetic field depends more heavily on lower-order moments than on higher-order moments, the electromagnetic field can be approximated without knowing the structure in detail.

Properties of multipole radiation

Linearity of moments

Since Maxwell's equations are linear, the electric field and magnetic field depend linearly on source distributions. Linearity allows the fields from various multipole moments to be calculated independently and added together to give the total field of the system. This is the well-known principle of superposition.

Origin dependence of multipole moments

Multipole moments are calculated with respect to a fixed expansion point which is taken to be the origin of a given coordinate system. Translating the origin changes the multipole moments of the system with the exception of the first non-vanishing moment.[4][5] For example, the monopole moment of charge is simply the total charge in the system. Changing the origin will never change this moment. If the monopole moment is zero then the dipole moment of the system will be translation invariant. If both the monopole and dipole moments are zero then the quadrupole moment is translation invariant, and so forth. Because higher-order moments depend on the position of the origin, they cannot be regarded as invariant properties of the system.

Field dependence on distance

The field from a multipole moment depends on both the distance from the origin and the angular orientation of the evaluation point with respect to the coordinate system.[4] In particular, the radial dependence of the electromagnetic field from a stationary -pole scales as .[2] That is, the electric field from the electric monopole moment scales as inverse distance squared. Likewise, the electric dipole moment creates a field that scales as inverse distance cubed, and so on. As distance increases, the contribution of high-order moments becomes much smaller than the contribution from low-order moments, so high-order moments can be ignored to simplify calculations.

The radial dependence of radiation waves is different from static fields because these waves carry energy away from the system. Since energy must be conserved, simple geometric analysis shows that the energy density of spherical radiation, radius , must scale as . As a spherical wave expands, the fixed energy of the wave must spread out over an expanding sphere of surface area . Accordingly, every time-dependent multipole moment must contribute radiant energy density that scales as , regardless of the order of the moment. Hence, high-order moments cannot be discarded as easily as in static case. Even so, the multipole coefficients of a system generally diminish with increasing order, usually as , so radiation fields can still be approximated by truncating high-order moments.[5]

Time-dependent electromagnetic fields

Sources

Time-dependent source distributions can be expressed using Fourier analysis. This allows separate frequencies to be analyzed independently. Charge density is given by

and current density by

.[6]

For convenience, only a single angular frequency ω is considered from this point forward; thus

The superposition principle may be applied to generalize results for multiple frequencies.[5] Vector quantities appear in bold. The standard convention of taking the real part of complex quantities to represent physical quantities is used.

It should be noted that the intrinsic angular momentum of elementary particles (see Spin (physics)) may also affect electromagnetic radiation from some source materials. To account for these effects, the intrinsic magnetization of the system would have to be taken into account. For simplicity however, these effects will be deferred to the discussion of generalized multipole radiation.

Potentials

The source distributions can be integrated to yield the time-dependent electric potential and magnetic potential φ and A respectively. Formulas are expressed in the Lorenz Gauge in SI units.[5][6]

In these formulas c is the speed of light in vacuum, is the Dirac delta function, and is the Euclidean distance from the source point x′ to the evaluation point x. Integrating the time-dependent source distributions above yields

where k=ω/c. These formulas provide the basis for analyzing multipole radiation.

Multipole expansion in near field

The near field is the region around a source where the electromagnetic field can be evaluated quasi-statically. If target distance from the multipole origin is much smaller than the radiation wavelength , then . As a result, the exponential can be approximated in this region as:

See Taylor expansion. By using this approximation, the remaining x′ dependence is the same as it is for a static system, the same analysis applies.[4][5] Essentially, the potentials can be evaluated in the near field at a given instant by simply taking a snapshot of the system and treating it as though it were static - hence it is called quasi-static.[5] See near and far field and multipole expansion. In particular, the inverse distance is expanded using spherical harmonics which are integrated separately to obtain spherical multipole coefficients.

Multipole expansion in far field: Multipole radiation

At large distances from a high frequency source, , the following approximations hold:

Since only the first-order term in is significant at large distances, the expansions combine to give

Each power of corresponds to a different multipole moment. The first few moments are evaluated directly below.

Electric monopole radiation, nonexistence

The zeroth order term, , applied to the scalar potential gives

where the total charge is the electric monopole moment oscillating at frequency ω. Conservation of charge requires q=0 since

.

If the system is closed then the total charge cannot fluctuate which means the oscillation amplitude q must be zero. Hence, . The corresponding fields and radiant power must also be zero.[5]

Electric dipole radiation

Electric dipole potential

Electric dipole radiation can be derived by applying the zeroth-order term to the vector potential.[5]

Integration by parts yields

.

and the charge continuity equation shows

.

It follows that

Similar results can be obtained by applying the first-order term, to the scalar potential. The amplitude of the electric dipole moment of the system is , which allows the potentials to be expressed as

Electric dipole fields

Once the time-dependent potentials are understood, the time-dependent electric field and magnetic field can be calculated in the usual way. Namely,

,

or, in a source-free region of space, the relationship between the magnetic field and the electric field can be used to obtain

where is the impedance of free space. The electric and magnetic fields that correspond to the potentials above are

which is consistent with spherical radiation waves.[5]

Pure electric dipole power

The power density, energy per unit area per unit time, is expressed by the Poynting vector . It follows that the time averaged power density per unit solid angle is given by

.

The dot product with extracts the emission magnitude and the factor of 1/2 comes from averaging over time. As explained above, the cancels the radial dependence of radiation energy density. Application to a pure electric dipole gives

where θ is measured with respect to .[5] Integration over a sphere yields the total power radiated:

Magnetic dipole radiation

Magnetic dipole potential

The first-order term, , applied to the vector potential gives magnetic dipole radiation and electric quadrupole radiation.[5]

The integrand can be separated into symmetric and anti-symmetric parts in n and x

The second term contains the effective magnetization due to the current and integration gives the magnetic dipole moment.

Notice that has a similar form to . That means the magnetic field from a magnetic dipole behaves similarly to the electric field from an electric dipole. Likewise, the electric field from a magnetic dipole behaves like the magnetic field from an electric dipole. Taking the transformations

on previous results yields magnetic dipole results.[5]

Magnetic dipole fields

[5]

Pure magnetic dipole power

The average power radiated per unit solid angle by a magnetic dipole is

where θ is measured with respect to the magnetic dipole . The total power radiated is:

[5]

Electric quadrupole radiation

Electric quadrupole potential

The symmetric portion of the integrand from the previous section can be resolved by applying integration by parts and the charge continuity equation as was done for electric dipole radiation.

This corresponds to the traceless electric quadrupole moment tensor . Contracting the second index with the normal vector allows the vector potential to be expressed as

[5]

Electric quadrupole fields

The resulting magnetic and electric fields are:

[5]

Pure electric quadrupole power

The average power radiated per unit solid angle by an electric quadrupole is

where θ is measured with respect to the magnetic dipole . The total power radiated is:

[5]

Generalized multipole radiation

As the multipole moment of a source distribution increases, the direct calculations employed so far become too cumbersome to continue. Analysis of higher moments requires more general theoretical machinery. Just as before, a single source frequency is considered. Hence the charge, current, and intrinsic magnetization densities are given by

respectively. The resulting electric and magnetic fields share the same time-dependence as the sources.

Using these definitions and the continuity equation allows Maxwell's equations to be written as

These equations can be combined by taking the curl of the last equations and applying the identity . This gives the vector forms of the non-homogeneous Helmholz equation.

Solutions of the wave equation

The homogeneous wave equations that describes electromagnetic radiation with frequency in a source-free region have the form.

The wave function can be expressed as a sum of vector spherical harmonics

Where are the normalized vector spherical harmonics and and are spherical Hankel functions. See spherical Bessel functions. The differential operator is the angular momentum operator with the property . The coefficients and correspond to expanding and contracting waves respectively. So for radiation. To determine the other coefficients, the Green's function for the wave equation is applied. If the source equation is

then the solution is:

The Green function can be expressed in vector spherical harmonics.

Note that is a differential operator that acts on the source function . Thus, the solution to the wave equation is:

Electric multipole fields

Applying the above solution to the electric multipole wave equation

gives the solution for the magnetic field:[5]

The electric field is:

The forumula can be simplified by applying the identities

to the integrand, which results in[5]

Green's theorem and integration by parts manipulates the formula into

The spherical bessel function can also be simplified by assuming that the radiation length scale is much larger than the source length scale, which is true for most antennas.

Retaining only the lowest order terms results in the simplified form for the electric multipole coefficients:[5]

is the same as the electric multipole moment in the static case if it were applied to the static charge distribution whereas corresponds to an induced electric multipole moment from the intrinsic magnetization of the source material.

Magnetic multipole fields

Applying the above solution to the magnetic multipole wave equation

gives the solution for the electric field:[5]

The magnetic field is:

As before, the forumula simplifies to:

Retaining only the lowest order terms results in the simplified form for the magnetic multipole coefficients:[5]

is the magnetic multipole moment from the effective magnetization while corresponds to the intrinsic magnetization .

General solution

The electric and magnetic multipole fields combine to give the total fields:[5]

Note that the radial function can be simplified in the far field limit .

Thus the radial dependence of radiation is recovered.

See also

References

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]

43 year old Petroleum Engineer Harry from Deep River, usually spends time with hobbies and interests like renting movies, property developers in singapore new condominium and vehicle racing. Constantly enjoys going to destinations like Camino Real de Tierra Adentro.

  1. 1.0 1.1 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  3. 3.0 3.1 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 4.3 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  5. 5.00 5.01 5.02 5.03 5.04 5.05 5.06 5.07 5.08 5.09 5.10 5.11 5.12 5.13 5.14 5.15 5.16 5.17 5.18 5.19 5.20 5.21 5.22 5.23 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 20 year-old Real Estate Agent Rusty from Saint-Paul, has hobbies and interests which includes monopoly, property developers in singapore and poker. Will soon undertake a contiki trip that may include going to the Lower Valley of the Omo.

    My blog: http://www.primaboinca.com/view_profile.php?userid=5889534